Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Playoffs?!? You Want To Talk About Playoffs?!? - Part Two: NFC

Well, the AFC picks are in and thankfully not everyone agreed with my selections. That wouldn't be fun now would it? I do think Cincinnati is going to be this year's surprise out of the AFC ( I guess the whole NFL if they do make the playoffs), and I do think Baltimore and Miami will be teams that fail to improve on what they did last season. Then again, what do I know...I thought that Tony Romo and Jessica Simpson were forever. I mean, if a quasi-talented, over-publicized diva who has really never done anything professionally to write home about and Jessica Simpson can't make it last, what hope do the rest of us have?

  Jessicacake_medium

via www.popcrunch.com


 

As you know from yesterday, our formula for picking playoff teams in July is make an argument for a couple favorites, a couple head coaches and a couple surprises. I cheated of course and added in the San Diego Chargers as a default team but I invoked the Norv Turner rule, which says that if you mix a good thing together with Norv Turner, everything shall be ruined and never go according to plan. Thankfully, we live in a Norv-free NFC. Here are the NFC predictions:

Favorites:

New York Giants: Is it just me or are the Dallas Cowgirls and the Philadelphia Eagles getting way too much press this off-season? The Giants are the class of the NFC East and I don't think it is close. They get Osi Umenyiora back this season to bolster an already violent pass rush. Eli, in all of his toothy glory, is good enough to guide that offense to more than enough points to stake that defense to a lead they can protect. They are well-coached, they have an excellent ground game with a punishing feature back in Brandon Jacobs and they picked up a wide receiver that I fear is going to have a pretty good year in Hakeem Nicks (and let's hope Ramses Barden still needs a LOT of polish.) The potential for major slippage from the last couple years is minimal with this squad.

T2

via i.a.cnn.net


 

Minnesota Vikings: I am completely convinced Brett Favre will be wearing purple this season. And I think his presence will make this team a prohibitive favorite on most Sundays. On Ahman Green's best day, he was no Adrian Peterson. Favre will have A.P., Chester Taylor, and one of the top five offensive lines in the league. The Vikings trot out the Williams' brothers on defense. Pat Williams and Kevin Williams comprise one of the top run-stuffing DT duos out there and Jared Allen is one of those "high-motor" guys coming off the edge. Antoine Winfield is a quality corner and Chad Greenway and E.J. Henderson solidify a better than average linebacking group. If Favre can maximize the talents of their receiving corps, this team should coast into the postseason.

Head Coaches:

Arizona Cardinals: The NFC is a little bit different of a beast than the AFC in this category. You can't tap a Jeff Fisher or a Bill Belichick in the NFC after getting out of the favorites section. But Ken Whisenhunt has really shown us something right? I mean, he took the Arizona Cardinals to the big dance. Of course, he was a Washington Redskin player back in 1989-90. And he does have Russ Grimm on his staff as the assistant head coach. So his Redskins ties help him immensely here. He enjoyed the benefit of a weak division last season but when he got to the playoffs, he shocked us all by laying the wood to the Carolina Panthers, in Carolina. The time he spent under Bill Cowher and last year's Super Bowl run give him the cred in this category.

Ken_20whisenhunt_medium

via blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com


 

New Orleans Saints: The temptation is to go with Andy Reid here. And he deserves it. But I am putting Philly in the same category as Baltimore and Miami--a team that will take a step backward next year. Instead, I am going with the 2006 NFL Coach of the Year Sean Payton. Sure, the Saints finished 8-8 last year, but I have them adding anywhere from 2-4 more wins to that record this season. Drew Brees is an absolute stud. It's like watching a flag football game when he's out there and everyone is an eligible receiver. He distributes his balls around the field like Charlie Sheen at a Playboy mansion party. His stable of receivers/tight ends/Reggie Bush is enviable: Marques Colston, Lance Moore, Devery Henderson, Robert Meachem, Jeremy Shockey, Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas. Pierre Thomas is a guy you may want to take a hard look at in fantasy leagues this year. Even if Reggie can stay healthy, I see Thomas getting a lot of carries. Defensively, they have talent, and this year they hope that Gregg Williams can maximize it. Sean Payton is a sharp dude. He has the Saints thinking they are a good team and this year they will prove it by advancing to the playoffs after last year's disappointing finish.

Surprises:

Green Bay Packers: I was thinking either Tampa Bay or Green Bay here. The Pack was 6-10 as opposed to the Bucs 9-7 finish, making Green Bay the bigger surprise to come back and make the playoffs. Not to mention picking both Atlanta and Carolina to get whupped on by Tampa Bay and New Orleans was a stretch even for me. I like Mike McCarthy. I like Aaron Rodgers. Ryan Grant saved my fantasy football season two years ago. This team was one bad throw away from getting to the Super Bowl two years ago. I think what happened last year was more about karma than anything else. Not that they necessarily deserved to go 6-10, but all of the off-season crap as well as a few injuries conspired to suppress their chances on the field. I really like this defense. A.J. Hawk can make plays. Their cornerback combo of Charles Woodson and Al Harris is as good as you could ask for, and putting Aaron Kampman at LB in the 3-4 should make them a pretty dangerous unit. The best part of this pick to me is that it means that not only will the two regular season games between Minnesota and Green Bay be meaningful, but they could actually meet in the playoffs.

Washington Redskins: Oh come on...you didn't think I would leave us out did you? This is exactly the kind of team that surprises the league every year. Nobody is picking them to make much noise at all, yet if you look at their roster and what they did last year, there is plenty to suggest that they could be this year's version of the Atlanta Falcons. You may argue that in the entire NFC, only one team scored less points than the Redskins last season (St. Louis Rams.) Our offense was a little anemic, especially as the season wore on. But on defense, only one team allowed less points than the Redskins (New York Giants.) The lack of attention this defensive unit gets baffles me. I sort of get it...I mean we have been rather irrelevant on the NFL landscape for a while now, but this defense is nasty. The season will hinge on the year-over-year improvement the offense can make. Jim Zorn has to prove he can extract nothing short of the best possible quarterback Jason Campbell is capable of becoming, and the young receivers--Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly, and Fred Davis--need to contribute early and often.

  Jc_medium

There you have it. We left some good teams on the sidelines. Jacksonville, Baltimore, Miami, Dallas and Philadelphia all have legitimate arguments to be included in these kinds of predictions. I think a team that will make a huge leap this year is the San Francisco 49ers, but I am not sold on their passing game, and wonder if they can score the points necessary to get into the playoffs (though they did outscore the Redskins last year by about 10 TD's.) It is only July though, so the whole exercise of picking playoff teams right now is somewhat absurd and even feckless. But I like my formula of two favorites, two head coaches, and two surprises from each conference. Who would you change from these picks and why?

1 recs  |  Comment 31 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nice analysis

Unfortunately, I think you’re probably right about the Midgets. Hakeem Nicks has a lot of upside. And their defensive line is arguably the best in the league. If/when Favre returns, the Vikings passing game improves dramatically, IMO. Percy Harvin may have the most impact in this year’s rookie WR class.

I think Atlanta is an up-and comer. Matt Ryan looks legit to me. Roddy White is great. Michael Turner and Jerious Norwood are a very talented RB tandem. And now they added Tony Gonzalez.

Arizona should not be overlooked either (obviously). They have the best WR corps in the NFL. And I think Beanie Wells will have an instant impact as a starter (more than the other rookie RBs), with Hightower used for goal line carries. The Cards defense came a long way last year also.

I also agree with both of your “surprise” picks.

RAK EM UP!

by VA_Skin on Jul 16, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Minnesota and Brett Farve’s washed up balloon ball doesn’t scare me

by pas493 on Jul 16, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha
Matt Ryan looks legit to me

great observation!! haha

by KevinE on Jul 16, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha. Yeah that sounds obvious to you and me, but for some reason I still hear certain people talk like Matt Ryan is overrated. If I was joining a brand new fantasy keeper league, I would definitely be targeting Matt Ryan as a top 5 QB option. Watching him play, he looks like he has the complete skill set to be good for a long time. The other rookie QB, Flacco, still has a lot to prove, IMO.

RAK EM UP!

by VA_Skin on Jul 16, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NFC South

I agree that only one team from the NFC South will make the playoffs. A lot of people like to argue that the South is actually the toughest division in the NFC— usually those people are fans of a South team or are just bitter with the coverage Beast teams get— but I’m not convinced. They played the AFC West and the (weak) NFC North last season, and I am never terrified when I see any of those teams on the schedule. No doubt they all have a lot of talent and I would put all 4 above the NFC North and West, maybe with the exception of Minnesota and Arizona. But I think they are also below the Giants, Skins, and Eagles.

I like your NO pick; hasn’t the team that finished last in the division won it the following year going back like five years or something? Carolina has a great running game but I don’t have a lot of confidence in Delhomme and the defense doesn’t blow me away. Tampa reminds me a lot of the Skins in that they’ve been competitive lately but haven’t taken it to the next level, plus with a new head coach, new QB and the departure of Monte Kiffin I would put them in a rebuilding stage. Atlanta was a definite surprise last year… I didn’t get to see them play much at all and it seemed like Arizona figured Matt Ryan out in the playoffs. They will definitely compete for the last Wild Card spot, but I don’t think they’ll get it.

by Boo. on Jul 16, 2009 12:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

NO

The Saints do get that sweet last place schedule, drawing Det and Stl (same as the skins). This should give them an advantage within the division. The NFC South plays the East this year, so I imagine the a wild card team will not be coming from the South….not to mention that there are no gimme games in that division and they should beat up on each other pretty well.

by liger99 on Jul 16, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So can we get your NFC Championship contenders, Sugar?

Saints vs Giants is my guess…altho if the Iggles can beat the Giants in NY…why can’t the Skins?

I love how no one is mentioning the Bears…you see this jersey?

http://deadspin.com/5314191/broncos-fans-are-thrilled-about-the-bears-new-quarterback

by KevinE on Jul 16, 2009 1:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jay Cutler may even have a great numbers year

But I think Green Bay and Minnesota will dominate the division. Which means Lovie Smith is probably coaching his last year in Chicago. Shanahan caoching the Bears? You heard it here first.

Giants vs. Skins in the NFC Championship? Why not? If I had to pick that game today, I might as well give the nod to the two NFC East teams.

by Ken Meringolo on Jul 16, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

But I am putting Philly in the same category as Baltimore and Miami—a team that will take a step backward next year.

I’m intrigued – Based on what?

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not Built for the Beast

Where is the Eagles running game? Westbrook is on the decline and he and McCoy are both more suited for screens and the like. I’m also not convinced about Jackson or Maclin, sure they’re fast but it’s way to early to bet on the offense being unstopable. Plus the defense is the only one in the division that failed to improve significantly and actually regressed some.

by Boo. on Jul 16, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wasn't asking you... You didn't write the article.

Now, can I get an explanation that isn’t completely retarded?

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Denial?

How about you respond with a point of your own? Your team is not that great, but I guess you have to get excited about something in that ass-crack of a city.

by Boo. on Jul 16, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

but I guess you have to get excited about something in that ass-crack of a city.

I never understand when people attack other cities. I HATE the Yankees, the Mets, the Giants, etc, and enjoy talking smack about those teams… But you know what? NYC is an awesome city. Same thing for cities like Boston, DC, Baltimore, and so on. In case you’ve never been there, Philly’s an awesome city too. It’s a great country we live in… Try not to be a douche.

Now, as far as responding with a point of my own, again, I wasn’t intrigued why you might think the Eagles will take a step backward, especially since you didn’t really have anything to say. You didn’t write the article. I’m interested in sugar’s take.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're Right

The architecture is fine. Cheesesteaks are tasty.

Your bad attitude is just representative of all the other Philadelphians I’ve met that give your city a bad name.

by Boo. on Jul 16, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

hahaha

its just too true

sugar + water + purple

by Grape Drank on Jul 28, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points.

I agree with a lot of Boo’s points.
- Westbrook may not be in decline, but he is more fragile than before. He’s still their biggest threat, but you really have to cross your fingers for a full season (like Portis and Jacobs too, actually).
- Neither Westbrook or McCoy are running through the tackles very often.
- Jackson and Maclin are fast and agile, but still unproven (ya, Jackson had a good rookie season. I’d credit most of it to McNabb).
- Their defense lost a lot in Johnson and Dawkins. They were the undisputed leaders of the D.

by SSBlitz on Jul 16, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Neither Westbrook or McCoy are running through the tackles very often.

Not true. Westbrook is no Brandon Jacobs, but he’s absolutely a powerful runner that breaks a ton of tackles.

Jackson and Maclin are fast and agile, but still unproven (ya, Jackson had a good rookie season. I’d credit most of it to McNabb).

Sorry, but you just can’t dismiss what Jackson did last year by saying “I’d give most of the credit to McNabb.” That’s just stupid. I’d say he’s certainly proven he’s a player. As for Maclin, I don’t think there are too many Eagles fans that are saying he MUST be a major part of this offense this year. Even without Maclin, I’m pretty happy with our receiving corps.

Their defense lost a lot in Johnson and Dawkins. They were the undisputed leaders of the D.

Jim Johnson – Huge loss – I’m not gonna dispute that… although Johnson’s proteges have been extremely successful (Steve Spagnuolo, Ron Rivera, and John Harbaugh to name a few). I have confidence in Shawn McDermitt. As for Dawkins, sure, he was a great leader, but it’s not like the other players are going to forget how to play football overnight. Dawkins is my favorite player of all time, but his loss is a hell of a lot more minimal than people are making it out to be.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s just stupid. I’d say he’s certainly proven he’s a player.

You call my opinion stupid, but have nothing to support your own. McNabb has been making wideouts in Philly look better than they are for years. The problem is when he goes down, the productivity of your offense goes with him.

he’s absolutely a powerful runner that breaks a ton of tackles.

I won’t argue with this, he breaks tackles. In space. But what do you do in 3rd and short?
but his loss is a hell of a lot more minimal than people are making it out to be.

That’s your opinion. I think the Haynesworth addition will be huge for the Skins, others think smaller. I think the loss of a 7 time pro bowler and inspirational leader to a defense is huge, you might think smaller. Only time will tell, really. But we’re arguing that your team has regressed while ours has improved. I think it’s a legit argument.

by SSBlitz on Jul 16, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair question Bye Dawk

I’ll tell you what…the NFL playoffs are one of the last bastions in pro sports where teams that are actually good enough to win in the playoffs are sitting home and watching. Which is why it makes for one of the best postseasons in pro sports. We can begin by admitting up front that in July, the accuracy of these predictions is questionbable. And to be fair, under the rules I made for myself in picking playoff teams, the Eagles and Redskins would not be fighting for the same spot. Andy Reid could have been a ‘head coach’ pick, and based on their playoff run last season, they could have been a ‘favorite’ over Minnesota. The Redskins can really only be a ‘surprise’ pick.
I didn’t make Philly a favorite because I think New York has proven a little dominance (in the league) over the last couple seasons, and I believe that if Minnesota lands Brett Favre, that team will be able to do some things on offense they have been unable to do the last two seasons. Adrian Peterson is dangerous enough when they have an average QB under center. If the defense has to respect the pass, he might actually kill someone this year.
Leaving Andy Reid out of the ‘head coach’ category is a tougher call for sure. On straight record and playoff accomplishments, he deserves it, just like I said in the article. For Ken Whisenhunt, you could say I am on the come, as he sent Andy home last year. I mean, he took the freaking Cards to the Super Bowl. That gets you a lot of props, right? And I think when you look at what he has done there, he just has to get a ton of credit for the decisions he has made with personnel and team identity.
Sean Payton….you might have a real problem with this one, and I understand completely. Payton was on one of Reid’s staffs right—as the QB coach? I based my decision on New Orleans on the following:
Sean Payton took a 3-13 team a couple seasons ago and took them to the playoffs. Payton has created an extension of himself on the field in Drew Brees and that offense is absolutely scary. Their team (despite a disappointing 8-8 season last year) seems to be building toward contention. Their defense needs to take the next step, and getting Gregg Williams to come down there was a nice move.
As for why I think Philly will take a step backward next year, I think it is because I think the Donovan McNabb ride is finally coming to an end in Philly. He’ll get you guys wins still, but at some point, you will have done everything you can do with him at QB. All those NFC championship games and even a Super Bowl…it is at least likely that you have gotten the best out of him already. So I went with a couple teams/coaches on the rise in the Cards and Saints.
It is certainly possible for the Eagles to make the playoffs, but like when you bet on your NCAA pool, you have to pick a #12 to beat #5, and couple #10’s to beat #7’s. I am simply betting your Philly team is the good team that misses out this year.

by Ken Meringolo on Jul 16, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is certainly possible for the Eagles to make the playoffs, but like when you bet on your NCAA pool, you have to pick a #12 to beat #5, and couple #10’s to beat #7’s. I am simply betting your Philly team is the good team that misses out this year.

Fair enough. Couldn’t possibly disagree more, but as a guy that usually has a 13 and a couple 12’s advancing in the tourney, I can understand that.

As far as the McNabb ride ending, I don’t see it. Is he in decline? Sure, that might be a fair statement. However, he’s still one of the best QB’s in the NFL, and easily top 3 in the NFC. I think the one true concern for Philly is the absence of Jim Johnson – Other than that, when you look at the depth chart, I just don’t see any glaring holes on this team. None.

Side note – As for the Saints, great offense… awful defense. Here’s their projected defensive starters…

DE – Charles Grant
DT – Sedrick Ellis
DT – Kendrick Clancy
DE – Will Smith
WLB – Scott Shanle
MLB – Jonathan Vilma
SLB – Scott Fujita
CB – Randall Gay
FS – Darren Sharper
SS – Roman Harper
CB – Jabari Greer

I don’t see a single player on that entire defense in which I say “That guy would definitely start on the Eagles.” Not one. You could make an argument for Sedrick Ellis, maybe Will Smith, and maybe Jonathan Vilma. But this is one of the worst defenses in the NFL.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I may be betting a little too much on Gregg Williams

But I think a defense with few big names actually favors his style of coaching. He typically does his best job when he can make it clear to his defense that there are no starters, and that there is nobody bigger than the overall unit. Plus I really think Darren Sharper is a huge addition. His impact may only be a one-year deal, but his leadership and experience at FS is going to to come in handy for sure.

by Ken Meringolo on Jul 16, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not going to lie and claim to know how well Darren Sharper did or didn’t play last year, but I know that when Philly played the Vikings in the playoffs, they were picking on him like crazy. For a guy that’s really made his bones in the NFL as a ball hawk (he has a very impressive 54 career picks), he only had ONE last year – and that was on a team with the Williams brothers and Jared Allen rushing the QB.

There’s a reason he only got a 1 year, $1.7 mil contract.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea b/c he is 33

most teams don’t give guys that are 32 or 33 (cough cough McNabb) long term deals

by pas493 on Jul 16, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brian Dawkins turns 36 in October and he just got a 5-year deal.

…and McNabb didn’t get a long term deal – he got extra money for a deal he already had which only has 2 years left.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So whats the plan? move him to o-line in two years when he’s to fat to play QB?

by pas493 on Jul 16, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d kinda like to see him keep playing QB at 300+.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 16, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's got several more years left in him...

…but I don’t think he’ll spend them all as an Iggle. I’d love to see what he could do in Minnesota. Favre will be somewhere else in 2010,so he may get the chance.

"I'd run over my own mother to win a Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby

by FletchIsUnstoppable on Jul 17, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Vilma is a beast.

I’d start him on most teams in the league.

by SSBlitz on Jul 16, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, you need to get over your man crush on Romo.

Every time I come here, something about Romo and the Cowpigs is on this page. COME ONI!! Please, can I come here and see pictures of Portis, and Campbell, and C. Rodgers. you don’t need SOOO many Cowgirl things here!!!!

by brettpedigo on Jul 17, 2009 2:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I love the page, though!

and sorry for the bad grammer.

by brettpedigo on Jul 17, 2009 2:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hahahaha

I will do anything to prevent people from thinking we have a man crush on Romo. We do like that picture though as it is somewhat absurd.

by Ken Meringolo on Jul 17, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com
Start posting about the Redskins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Thefalcoholic_small
Ask The Falcoholic!
Small
2010 Draft - Offensive Line
Small
The 2010 Redskins offense
Small
D-line, Cartwright make Skins worth watching

Recent FanPosts

Lavarr_small
Uniform Change
H2_logo_b_small
Looks Like Hunter the Punter Out For Sunday
Small
Riggo or Blache...
Lavarr_small
3-4 Defense
Small
Need some help guys, going to the game next week.
Skinsdallas_small
Riggins slams Snyder, again, on Inside the NFL:
Small
A Project for you all, I think this will be interesting
The-three-stooges-football_small
Nickname needs to go
Small
Fred Davis, I like the sound of this

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Blogging The Boys
Pickin' & Grinnin' Week Nine
Mile High Report
Scouting Terrence Cody
Battle Red Blog
Ryan Moats Will Start Against The Colts

SPONSORS


Managers

Superbowl_small KevinE

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

H2_logo_b_small Sugar

Authors

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol