Tennessee Prosecutor to Seek Indictment Against Haynesworth
Update 3/11/09 3:00PM - I spoke with the Redskins, and they were aware of the Haynesworth situation prior to signing him. They declined any further comment understandably since Albert's lawyer is now running the show.
According to an injured victim's attorney, prosecutors in Williamson County will be going to the grand jury today, March 9, seeking an indictment against the Redskins' new hundred million dollar defensive lineman. The charges arise out of a car accident that occurred on December 13, 2008 that left the victim disabled. Four days earlier, Haynesworth had received a sentence of thirty days probation and a $1000 fine when he was clocked driving 103mph in a 70mph zone. In a release to the Tennessean, Jon Perry, attorney for the the victim, Corey Edmondson, gave his account of the accident:
"Haynesworth was witnessed traveling at speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour after he entered I-65 and immediately began to move quickly in and out of lanes attempting to pass other vehicles in his way. Haynesworth tried to pass Corey’s vehicle on the right, but another vehicle was in the way. Haynesworth slammed on his brakes and abruptly crossed multiple lanes into the inside lane next to the concrete barrier wall. Accelerating his Ferrari up to speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour, Haynesworth tried to pass Mr. Edmondson and crossed into his lane suddenly and without warning, striking Mr. Edmondson’s driver side. This collision, which left black paint from Haynesworth’s Ferrari on Mr. Edmondson’s driver side, caused Mr. Edmondson to slam into the concrete median wall resulting in severe injuries to Mr. Edmondson and totaling his vehicle."
The exact facts appear to be in dispute, but there was a witness who said that Albert passed her when she was driving 79mph. When I spoke with Albert’s agent, Chad Speck, he was unwillingly to comment since Albert’s lawyers are now handling the case, but he told me that the "careless driving" charge was dropped in the Brentwood City Court. Mr. Perry told Hogs Haven that this lesser charge was voluntarily dismissed by Brentwood Police so more appropriate and serious charges could be investigated and presented today. When the Tennessean reported the incident, Chad Speck originally responded: "Albert was completely unaware of any injuries sustained by anyone involved in the accident at the time. Mr. Edmondson's injuries are unfortunate and Albert certainly wishes him a very speedy recovery. He promptly turned this matter over to his insurance company."
Perry has a different version of the events:
"My office contacted [Haynesworth’s] insurance to pay Mr. Edmondson’s totaled car one week after the accident and they had received no report from Haynesworth or his agents. His insurance company knew nothing about the accident. My office first reported the accident to them, not Haynesworth. Just like his probation officer, his insurance company was not contacted by Haynesworth to report the accident or the new criminal charges."
According to Perry, as of last week, his client's medical bills have exceeded $230,000, so they are anxious to receive a payment to help cover these costs. He said that unless Haynesworth or his insurance company agrees to pay some advancement on his settlement or future jury verdict, they will have to move the case forward by filing suit. The victim still is unable to walk due to the hip replacement surgery and has only left his house three times since December 26th. In the mean time, a local bank has set up an account and website to receive donations for Mr. Edmondson to help pay his rent and utilities since settlements can take months or sometimes years.
We will update this story as more information becomes available.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Someone witnessed him going 100?
Can that hold up in court?
A) I wonder if Vinny or Danny knew anything about this. It is a big assumption, but assuming they did, are they worried he is going to miss any time if he actually does get in trouble for this?
B) It makes for a big headline when a guy making this kind of dough gets into this kind of predicament, but I am willing to wager a lot of professional athletes are involved in thses kinds of things. How did the Outsider miss this one?
by Ken Meringolo on Mar 9, 2009 9:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yea...
A.) I would bet they knew about the accident but assumed it would amount to nothing. ESPN put out a very small article about the accident in mid-February, before the Tennessean article.
B.) You seem surprised about JLC. I’m not.
I would imagine this gets settled quickly and Albert maybe loses his license for a bit. Where are the HogsHaven lawyers on this one?
by KevinE on Mar 9, 2009 9:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The longer it goes without any resolution, the worse it looks for Haynesworth...
…just think about the jury pool in Tennessee!
by artmonk4ever on Mar 9, 2009 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another great headline for this story would have been...
Mo’ Money…Mo’ Problems
—or—
I got 99 problems and a judge is one
by KevinE on Mar 9, 2009 10:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was being sarcastic
about JLC’s prowess…but I was being serious because this would be something I think he would be all over harping on since he hates the Redskins.
by Ken Meringolo on Mar 9, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If I were Haynesworth
I would just give the victim 500,000 then release a seemingly sincere apology and call it done. Haynesworth would be giving him the money to cover his bills and he would look at least somewhat sympathetic by giving him more money than he actually needed, along with the apology. Obviously he just got millions of dollars, on top of the millions he already has, so why not just try to end this as soon as possible? I’m not a lawyer and don’t have a clue as to whether or not this situation is somehow different than most cases, but giving the victim a cure for all injuries (money) would seem most sensible and least bothersome to everyone. At least that’s my opinion and what I would do, but as I said I’m not a lawyer so there may be something that I don’t know about.
by bigrm18 on Mar 9, 2009 5:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Seems there is a little more than this tho since Haynesworth violated his parole by speeding again and was ‘careless.’ He’ll probably shake off that charge since the cops never issued him any tickets on the scene and there is no hard evidence of exactly how fast he was going. I’m working on seeing how the indictment went today and what (if any) charges were brought forward.
by KevinE on Mar 9, 2009 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
If the TN prosecutor’s office is considering criminal charges, Haynesworth paying the guy off could be viewed to imply an admission of wrongdoing. If he is going to settle with the other driver, he’d be better served by waiting to do so until after the threat of possible criminal charges has passed.
by Slug on Mar 10, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks...
That’s good to know Slug. Welcome to HH as well.
by KevinE on Mar 10, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Federal Rule of Evidence 409. Payment of Medical and Similar Expenses
“Evidence of furnishing or offering or promising to pay medical, hospital, or similar expenses occasioned by an injury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.”
Hayensworth’s dealing with the victim is completely separate from any criminal charges that might be filed. The criminal charges will be reckless/negligent driving etc. Whether or not he paid the victim’s medical expenses doesn’t appear to be probative as to how he was driving, especially given the fact that the victim’s attorney has been seeking to publicize his client’s injuries. It could easliy be described as just good PR.
by artmonk4ever on Mar 10, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Geez...
It’s sad to see a situation where Albert can not learn from the mistakes in his past. This incident was from 2006.
by KevinE on Mar 10, 2009 9:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Brief note:
Haynesworth tried to pass Corey’s vehicle on the right, but another vehicle was in the way. Haynesworth slammed on his brakes and abruptly crossed multiple lanes into the inside lane next to the concrete barrier wall. Accelerating his Ferrari up to speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour, Haynesworth tried to pass Mr. Edmondson and crossed into his lane suddenly and without warning, striking Mr. Edmondson’s driver side.
If Haynesworth had to allegedly accelerate to 100MPH+ to pass Edmondson, then how fast was Edmondson himself traveling?
We are truly in the presense of greatness here…-- unnamedDBacksfan
by DbacksSkins on Mar 10, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good question...
Can a 1999 grand marquis even go over 70mph? I have the DA’s name, I’ll see if I can track down some more info since she is the one who is handling the indictment.
by KevinE on Mar 10, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















