Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

The Cards Were Fairly Dealt

But Terry McAulay was too big a part of the game for my tastes. The catch and throw between Big Ben and Santonio was simply perfect. You love to see big games won by the winner as opposed to lost by the loser. This game was won by Pittsburgh for sure. But when it seemed like the refs were calling everything by the letter of the law, there were instances like the Santonio celebration that made you wonder. I mean, you can see that Adrian Wilson did not mean to run into the holder, but he did and they called it. The Lebron-esque celebration was great, but clearly a violation, and not called. The facemask by the rookie ARI corner was marginally flag-worthy, but on the replay, you could at least see why the ref reached for his hanky. But America also could see that it was clearly something that did not HAVE to be called (no head jerk). On a case-by-case basis, the three personal fouls by the Cards on that one drive were ones that get called...for the most part...sometimes. Let's be honest, everyone knows you can call a penalty on every play. What in the hell are these guys thinking adopting that philosophy on Super Bowl Sunday? During one rather important drive? Again, you can't say they made necessarily bad calls, but you could argue that over the course of a season, those calls don't get made with the regularity they were made in this game. And even if you did argue that, you would still be sucking on sour grapes, because the calls were there to make.

The last play was a fumble. I thought it was a fumble after the first replay. The previously reviewed Warner fumble was clearly an incompletion, again, evident after the first slow-motion replay (double slow motion if you paused and slow-mo'ed it on your DVR like I did). It was just a bad way to handle the situation by not reviewing the last play. In a game like that, what is the cost of 60 extra seconds to have the ref announce to the crowd that the booth was reviewing the play? They were reviewing it anyway, so making that announcement might have put the slobberingly drunken masses watching the game at that point rest a little easier. The impression was that nobody in the booth was reviewing it, and with no booth review, the perception is something might get missed. The post-game statement that the play was actually a fumble is meaningless. We knew it was a fumble. We wanted the review of the play resulting in the correct call to occur prior to the final whistle. The fact that two ENORMOUS calls were reversed by Arizona challenges should have meant something in the closing seconds to the replay guys in the booth. If for no other reason than to effect the appearance of due process, the Cards deserved to have that call looked at more closely. (By the way, calling a TD on the opening drive when Ben simply did not seem to cross the goal line in regular speed, even with the illegal help of his offensive lineman was conspicuous.)

All that said--and thank God for the NFL's sake:

The Steelers won. The Cards did not get jobbed. Between the NFL's Defensive Player of the Year making his impact on the game with no time remaining in the first half, and the improvisation and poise of Big Ben down the stretch, this game was won by the Steelers, not lost by the Cards. The plays on the field overshadowed the calls by the refs. In time, I think that will be more and more the case as we look back on this particular Super Bowl.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

reasonable people (like me) can -- and do -- disagree with you, Splenda!

You write: “The last play was a fumble.” However, I don’t think it’s altogether clear that this is the case. Please correct me if I’m wrong, but the rule states (generally) that the passer has to control the football and his arm has to be moving forward for the ruling to be incomplete pass. Clearly Warner’s hand was moving forward. The ball moves when Warner is hit, but the ball comes out of his hand in a spiral. If Warner controlled the ball enough to throw a) a spiral and b) as far as he did with a DL hanging on his arm, had he really lost control?

That’s my two cents, but the bigger problem is the way it was handled. Here’s the problem with that: the officials in the replay booth reviewed the Harrison TD and Holmes TD catch for a VERY long time even though — at least to most of us, I gather — the ruling on those plays was much more clear than the ruling on the Warner play. It is suspicious at best that the final play was afforded a review. Of course the NFL is saying that now! At the very least, Cardinal fans (and fans of fairness everywhere!) should feel cheated out of a review of a length appropriate to the occasion.

by artmonk4ever on Feb 4, 2009 7:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Then you do agree with me

Because I thought and wrote that they did deserve to have that last play reviewed.

However, I think Warner lost possession of the ball prior to his arm moving forward on that last play. I think that is why it was a fumble, and I think just comparing it to the previously reviewed Warner play offers visual evidence of the differences between the two rulings (in my humble opinion). It should have been reviewed, but I think the call was right.

by Ken Meringolo on Feb 4, 2009 10:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think it was an incomplete pass. That's where I disagree with you.

He lost possession of the ball to the extent that he could still throw a spiral? He must have God on his side.

by artmonk4ever on Feb 4, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Watch it again

The ball came out with the back end first – not the end that Warner had pointing down the field when he went to throw it. Also, the spiral lasted about 1 rotation and then the ball ended up end over end like a punt. Clearly a fumble.

by CaliHigh on Feb 4, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the back end first?

I’m not even sure what this means, and as I as I’m aware, what end of the football comes out first (?) or how long it spirals (or if it spirals at all) have nothing to do with whether or not it was a fumble. I mentioned the spiral only as evidence that Warner had enough control when it left his hand to actually “throw” it.

by artmonk4ever on Feb 5, 2009 3:54 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com
Start posting about the Redskins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sidney-harbour-australia_small
Positivity week!!!
Small
Cerrato Owes Campbell an Apology...And I Have Written It

Recent FanPosts

Small
Friday Fandomonium
Sidney-harbour-australia_small
Skins History
Skinsdallas_small
We have a player of the week......
Cooley_small
COWGIRLS hate WEEK!!!!!
Img_1768_small
Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Redskins Name Case
Small
So this is what winning feels like. I remember now!
Lavarr_small
My Dream Overhaul
Bottleboyavatar_small
do you think somebody might be using a voodoo doll?
Small
Joe Bugel is no E. F. Hutton ...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Stampede Blue
Winning Stats Power Rankings: Week 11
Big Cat Country
Shallow Thoughts and Aimless Musings
Battle Red Blog
Steve Slaton To Start On Monday Night

SPONSORS


Managers

Superbowl_small KevinE

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

H2_logo_b_small Sugar

Authors

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol