Redskins GM Bruce Allen Has a Real Problem on His Hands; Chris Cooley or Fred Davis?
When Cooley went down with an injury, it crossed my mind: "What happens to Cooley if Fred Davis emerges?"...and here we are.
With the movers already loading up Jim Zorn's belongings, the Redskins need decide what to do with their two stud tight ends. Most coaches don't use two TE sets, and even the ones that do use it limitedly. It doesn't make sense to rotate two pro-bowl caliber tight ends into play drives just to please them both. So, in a team that needs to fill so many holes, you have to trade one. Even though Cooley was optimistic that when he returns they could co-exist, it just doesn't seem likely. Both players are play-makers and with this offense that desperately needs an OL make-over, there is not room for both of them. The Redskins already are missing their 3rd (Jeremy Jarmon) and 6th (Jason Taylor) round picks, and I'd think either TE could net the Skins a 2nd round pick at worst. After all, both are better than Jeremy Shockey and the Saints gave up a 2nd round pick for him. I am honestly happy with either. Here lies the problem:
Fred Davis is younger, cheaper, and is still progressing. Cooley is a reliable veteran and fan favorite. What do you do?
If Cooley is shipped out then we know Bruce Allen is running this team. There's no way Dan Snyder would allow the top jersey seller and fan favorite to get shipped. This really is a tough call, so let's look at the stats:
| Year | Team | Rec | Yds | Yds/G | Avg | Lg | TD | 1st | YAC | Trgt |
| 2004 | Washington Redskins | 37 | 314 | 19.6 | 8.5 | 31 | 6 | 23 | 117 | 63 |
| 2005 | Washington Redskins | 71 | 774 | 48.4 | 10.9 | 32 | 7 | 44 | 487 | 103 |
| 2006 | Washington Redskins | 57 | 734 | 45.9 | 12.9 | 66 | 6 | 33 | 419 | 94 |
| 2007 | Washington Redskins | 66 | 786 | 49.1 | 11.9 | 39 | 8 | 46 | 301 | 110 |
| 2008 | Washington Redskins | 83 | 849 | 53.1 | 10.2 | 28 | 1 | 43 | 475 | 111 |
| 2009 | Washington Redskins | 29 | 332 | 55.3 | 11.4 | 25 | 2 | 17 | 185 | 45 |
| Totals: | 343 | 3789 | 44.1 | 11.0 | 66 | 30 | 206 | 1984.0 | 526 | |
Fred Davis (I'm throwing out the 3 games from 2008):
| Year | Team | Rec | Yds | Yds/G | Avg | Lg | TD | 1st | YAC | Trgt |
| 2009 | Washington Redskins | 42 | 463 | 33.1 | 11.0 | 29 | 6 | 28 | 219 | 65 |
Cooley started 7 games this year (before fracturing his ankle), while Fred has played 8 games as the starter. Cooley averages more yards per game and to his defense, that was when Zorn was calling the plays (and putting up single digit scores on the NFL bottom feeders). On the flip side, Davis was going against some of the best defenses in the league and showed promise with solid blocking.
[Images via images1.everyjoe.com, masnsports.com]
0 recs |
96 comments
|
Comments
Again with the hard questions KevinE?
SpotieOtieDopalicious
It helps take focus away on how miserable this season has been
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
Pains me to say it
but it looks like Captain Chaos would be the one to go then (Dammit!).
MY only thing would be to keep them both for one year, just to make sure Sleepy wasn’t a flash in the pan (I don’t think so but like we all say, it wouldn’t hurt.)
Don’t the Ravens need receiver help? Why not see what we could get from them for ARE?
SpotieOtieDopalicious
ARE's contract makes him untradeable...
Averages $5 mil a year til 2014.
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
It does make him eminently cutable, though
In an uncapped season.
ARE
And that is a double slap in the face with him. Not only does he suck on the field, his contract sucks even harder.
his CONTRACT
Makes him untradeable? That’s putting it a little mildly.
by CJHutch on Dec 30, 2009 2:17 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Because
They need wr help. Not improving on how to run left right left fumble.
I'm worried about the beer supply. After this case, and the other case, there's only one case left- Barney Gumble
by CptChaosSidekick on Dec 29, 2009 10:25 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
how about Moss then?
can’t exactly outrun linebackers like he used to (ugh), but I’m sure we could get at least a 2nd for him with the way their corps is lookin
SpotieOtieDopalicious
Let the new system decide
Nobody knows who the new coach will be, but assuming that it’s an Irish lad, we know he doesn’t run a West Coast system. Unfortunately, Cooley is probably more of a West Coast fit and Davis looks like the fella that Shanny could use better in his offense. Any thoughts on sending Portis back to Denver for Champ?? Maybe I’m just dreaming……
nah
you’re on a mushroom trip.
. Any thoughts on sending Portis back to Denver for Champ?? Maybe I’m just dreaming……/blockquote>
Why do you think Cooley’s more of a West Coast fit?
SpotieOtieDopalicious
Just my opinion
After seeing how much Campbell relied on him in short yardage (usually to keep from getting killed) it just seems to me that he has a knack for finding little seems underneath coverage and certainly does well with screens……Admittedly, I have never been a fan of West Coast, but to the best of my knowledge, the intentions are to move the ball consistently with short gains in the passing game. Davis looks more like a Whitten or Vernon Davis type of TE. Also, the type of offense that Pete Carroll ran at USC was more like a Shanny offense, giving another nod to Davis.
Davis Looks More Like a Witten Type to Me
Jason Witten is a receiver TE with great hands and (after years of improvement) no better than decent blocking skills. Vernon Davis is a physical beast who is one of the best blocking TEs in the league. Davis’s hands are only so-so, and he has concentration lapses from time to time. Both TEs do have speed that makes them dangerous in the passing game. Davis seems more like the Witten “receiver playing TE” type than the traditional TE bruiser. Not that I would mind if he grew into that role – it would be nice to have a TE that made OTHER team’s safeties look bad from time to time.
Both?
Cooley is coming off an injury that could hurt his trade value, and there’s the chance that Davis was just a one year wonder (if you even want to call it that) like Rekka said. So keep them both and see what we can do. That gives whoever is our quarterback next year two reliable options.
Well, Shockey came off the same injury
And the Giants got a 2nd rounder.
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions
I voted keep them both...
afterall, we do need depth at least at 1 position. One idea, shop Cooley and see if someone comes back willing to go with Davis for the same or more. Also, we don’t know at this point if Cooley’s injury is performance threatening.
Also – keep Yoder!! He can block and play FB on short yardage situations as well as score.
Finally, if no one is using a “double Whitten” attack, it’s probably something we should look into, as no one has built a team around trying to defend two guys with their size and speed. Makes us and our other receivers more dangerous.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I worry about those bolts in his ankle
They weren’t necessary to heal. He had them put in so he could make it back for this season.
Who knows how it could affect his recovery/future play.
by DCtoAustralia on Dec 31, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions
I love both players, but
if they were good blocking TEs I’d say ok keep both. They aren’t. In fact, they are both subpar blockers.
Can Davis be converted to a possession WR a la Brandon Marshall? Is he fast enough?
If the answer is no, the redundancy just isn’t worth it. You keep the young, cheap guy with the high ceiling and you trade the vet, just like in baseball.
If the answer is yes, randal el and malcolm kelly are the guys who need to be packing.
by sofutomygaha on Dec 29, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
Keep Both
I doubt the premise of the question basically because I don’t think you get a second round pick for either TE. Yes, the Saints gave up a 2nd for Shockey, but Shockey (as we know) is wildly overhyped and the Saints bought it. I’ll bet if you asked them again they’d keep the pick. Cooley has a large contract and is coming off an injury, and Sleepy has had a half of a productive receiving season crammed into two years (and his blocking, while better than last year, still ain’t great). On top of that is the sheer number of good young TEs that have come into the league the past couple of years. Higher supply cuts demand, period.
From a team standpoint, I’d keep both and put one of the players into an H-Back kind of role. Let Cooley work his way back and Davis establish himself, and then see what your options are.
+1
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Dec 29, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
I tend to agree
I’m simply not sold on Fred Davis yet and Cooley still has a few good years in him (and is a much better blocker). Davis has stepped up quite a bit the second half of this season but remember he was nowhere to be found before that. Some might say that’s because Cooley kept him from getting a shot at starting but I have a hard time believing that if he was really outplaying Cooley at practice and camp we wouldn’t know about it.
If the move has to be made so be it but I think Cooley shouldn’t be let go for less than he’s worth and I really think it’s premature to go all on Davis at this point.
by SkinsOsTerps on Dec 29, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
Why is it a bad position to be in?
It couldn’t be any better than having 2 excellent tight ends. When are we going to start worrying about winning instead of the players feelings. Dangle them both out their, whoever brings the biggest return goes. It’s that simple. Cooley has at least 2-3 very good years in him, so it doesn’t matter who stays although I’d prefer Davis stays because he’s younger, much, much cheaper and his best years are ahead of him. Also, if he’s going to be after a huge contract in his FA year, than that means he has value and with a new GM he has possible trade value also, bringing in more picks possibly. WOW what a novel idea. Don’t forget Yoder is here to backup either one.
Cooley built a home, so what! It’s not like he has money problems or ever will. If Bruce Allen is worried about hurting the players feelings, then not much is going to change. This situation reminds me of the Portis/Bailey trade. I can see Vinny swapping Davis for someone of a lesser value, throwing a pick in, and then paying Cooley till he’s 38 at 7 or 8 mil a year. Not exactly the same situation, but you get the idea.
Lets’s hope those days are gone.
I agree with keeping Fred
And it’s this exact situation that validates Vinny Cerrato’s philosophy “draft the best player available” is a terrible one.
We now have two stud TEs and still ZERO pass blockers. We’re going to end up trading one of them for the same 2nd round pick we used to draft the TE in the first place. If we had drafted an OL instead, he’d be used to keep Jason off his back. Ugh..I’m all pissed off again.
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
just to be an ass
we got Cooley with a 3rd.
Although, the production we’ve gotten out of him has been more than that.
SpotieOtieDopalicious
I was talking about Fred...
Redskins had a pro-bowl TE (Cooley) and used a 2nd round pick for another TE…makes no sense. Imagine if Cerrato used that pick for an OL. Yoder is a serviceable backup and arguably serviceable starter…so use a top pick for a 3rd TE….I don’t see how anyone can defend this argument.
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
Davis is far from proven yet
That being the case, you don’t trade one of your only veterans, a team leader, a fan favorite, and an all-around reliable guy like Cooley.
Spending a year or two using 2 good TEs isn’t the end of the world
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I would agree with this if Skins were an 8-8 team
That 2nd round pick is much more important to the future than another year with 3 TEs.
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
yeah. it's a very tough (hypothetical) situation for sure
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Agreed
Although his Contract isn’t exactly chump change. It’s going to be difficult to pass it along and get a 2nd I would think. This will present a challenge.
With a competent play caller...
and a better line, the SKY IS THE LIMIT ON THE GOAL LINE!!!! think about this. marco on the edge…. two tight set with Cooley and Fred on opposite sides….. A decent line that could plow it in. I mean, who do you key on?
That exposes another thing the Redskins need
Running Back
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
And that is where.......
Putting together a good draft or 2 comes in. I think with Cerrato gone, there is hope. With some of Allen’s draft history in Tampa, it is a little unsettling. However, I think there is hope and the draft is the only way to start putting pieces together with this offense.
Wait...
This whole conjecture rests on the idea that Fred Davis is a “Pro-Bowl level tight end.” Since when is that the case? Chris Cooley was literally our best player before he went down this season. Fred Davis is a nice addition, but he doesn’t control the game like Cooley did. Part of Davis’ strength was that no one knew who he was, so he got away with not being covered or game-planned against like Cooley did.
I am definitely not ready to give up on Cooley or anoint Davis as a great tight end. He had some drops and is not NEARLY as capable of a blocker as Cooley is. I say keep both. Lots of offenses use two tight-end sets, and at worst, we can put Cooley in as h-back/fullback and run him out of the backfield sometimes.
I am certainly not ready to give up on Cooley, because a 2nd round pick does not by any means guarantee a good return on the investment, and Davis is not an equal player to Cooley… not even close.
By the way, on a team with a weak o-line and no receivers, how can it be bad to have two guys who can block and catch passes and create mismatches? Just sayin’.
Good evaluation
Cooley as an H-back like Gibbs used him could be great and keep Fred at TE, unfortunately 1.) Not many coaches use H-back, and 2.) Sellers just got an extension. Not that I like Sellers, but mgmt might feel different. He certainly should be on the chopping block when that time comes.
The secret has been out on Fred for several weeks now and he’s still scoring TDs.
As for Cooley’s blocking, he is not a good one and has admitted so. They usually have to chip on his side whereas Fred can hold down 1-1.
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
Good points
I still believe we need to get rid of one of them for picks if that’s possible. IMO Davis is a very capable TE and WAY cheaper thus only helping the team to get to a higher level as fast as possible.
This team could have 10 TE’s next year but it won’t mean crap if they don’t find a way to piece together a decent O-line, and this same exact conversation will be taking place right about this time next year.
I think Allen realizes this and hopefully he shakes things up.
How much fun would it be......
to keep both? I mean, just imagine a 2 tight end set like that? Sure, the offensive line needs to be patched (errrrr…… demolished and then reconstructed), but let’s say the OL is halfway decent toward the end of next year, or into 2011. Cooley and Davis as receiving threats on both sides of the line would be amazing. I think it would create a lot of chaos for opposing D’s throughout the league. It would also play to a receiving strength – the WR’s certainly aren’t the best receivers on the team. Over the past few seasons, Cooley has been the best pass catcher, and over the last few weeks of the season, Davis has emerged as so. It would get guys that don’t deserve to be on the field, and who don’t contribute, off of the field.
Now to address the concerns of blocking, I still would like to see Davis improve. Sure, he has shown that he can be better than Cooley, but I think there is still work to be done.
I know it is kind of off the charts and kind of a dream to think of them both being on the field for this team, considering all of the needs there are. However, I think it would actually be a good move.
Send Fred
There’s a lot to be said for the fan favorite. Cooley was a no-name discovered by Gibbs who came up with the Skins to be our most productive and pro-bowl receiver over the past few years. He is a proven talent. Everybody loves him, and he loves the Skins. He is good for the locker room, and is a well liked teammate. I don’t think trading him sends a good message to the team. And frankly, aside from the feel good stuff, he is still a better proven talent than Fred Davis at this point.
Davis appears as though he will be a very good player, but his sample size is still too small to know for sure. But he would still certainly fetch a favorable return…possibly even better than Cooley could because of his age and contract. And since Cooley still likely to be very productie, get what you can for Fred.
Time to think like the Patriots -- NOW.
As much as I love Cool, and want him to retire a Redskin and enjoy that big fine house, the fact is this is the NFL, guys get traded or cut, and this team needs to rebuild logically instead of emotionally. Cools had a MAJOR injury, he’s been in the league a few years, and he’s valuable to someone else, and WE NEED TO BUILD A TEAM.
Use him right, and he could prove more valuable to us than Hershel Walker was for Jimmie Johnson in building 1990s Dallas—and don’t forget, Walker came back to the Cowgirls in the end anyway.
I agree.......... I think
What are you saying?… we need him or we don’t? I really like what you’re saying about thinking logically instead of emotionally. It’s almost as if many fans are saying to keep him because he’s a cool guy with his website and blah blah blah. Fact is, we can most likely get something for him in trade value back and not have that much of a drop off if any at all in Davis.
Look, I like Cooley a bunch and he’s a great player but saving money, getting very good production out of the same position and getting back picks……..is this not how you run a team?
Or wait lets keep him because he’s cool, he bought a big house, he has a great website and we see his family walking around stadium all the time, maybe he can start twittering on the sidelines during the game to keep everyone happy to……… we don’t need the draft picks! While were at it lets just make it a perfect strike and bring back Vinny Ceratto. I mean nothings really going to change anyway so what’s the difference.
For my money
I’d keep em both and run alot of 2 TE sets and let Sellers go. It could help our Tackles who will probably be mediocre or rookies in pass pro and would put all our best playmakers on the field at the same time. Especially if we can get a back with some speed who can get to the corners when the TE seals a DE.
Expanded Two-Tights Focus
Carver, brett, and BayArea all have the best ideas I’ve heard on this subject. It is certainly way too early to pass judgment on the long-term effects of Cooley’s injury, or the recent competence displayed by Davis. And the team’s holes and weaknesses…well, that dead horse has been beaten enough and bears no further secrets. So now that a positional strength has been identified, maximize it by being creatively tactful with the overall look and focus of the offense. Confuse defenses with multiple targets and weapons on the field, while sticking to fundamental execution. Eliminate field fillers by replacing them with competent, strong players that highlight the offense’s strengths, through creative (yet, fundamental) formations. This could not only compensate for the offense’s deficiencies, but it would clearly exploit the holes that desperately need filling, in order to give Allen and the coaching staff a clear picture of where to focus future efforts in free agency and the draft.
Sure, it’s easy to say this idealistic philosophy here, and to implement it at a high volume would definitely be an out-of-the-box risk; it may even sound laughable to some. But it can be done, with the right vision and personnel. Now, will this or any other potentially-successful field philosophy be implemented, or even considered? Therein lies the million-dollar question…
by Dixie's Football Pride on Dec 29, 2009 4:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Developing a system to fit our personnel strengths?
And not imposing a new system designed for a roster with different strengths?
Well that just takes all the fun out of jamming the square peg in the round hole, now doesn’t it?
Yeah...
Sensible use of available resources doesn’t quite fit the M.O. of Snyderball. What was I thinking?
by Dixie's Football Pride on Dec 29, 2009 6:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I mean they don't even have to use a 2-TE as the base for us to get alot of use out of Davis
though I do think that would be our most potent formation especially when you consider we can always flex one of the TE’s out into the Slot or into the backfield. I mean what if Davis got alot more work out of 2-TE sets in the red zone. I can see us doing well where Cooley gets more yards, catches, and snaps and Fred gets more TD’s(he’s a bigger redzone target). It seems like there is always a FB or backup TE who gets like 2-4 TD’s a year just in goal line packages and I can easily see Cooley getting like 60 Balls and 4 TD’s and Davis getting like 30-40 and 8 TD’s. Besides it’s comforting to know we will get good TE play from one of them next year as we could have suspect journeymen or rookies at O-line and possibly a rookie QB.
by BayAreaBullet on Dec 29, 2009 7:07 PM EST up reply actions
Good point about utilizing Davis in the red zone...
But it’s the actual getting to the red zone that I’m worried about. It’s going to take some major changes in the current status quo to not telegraph the team’s offensive intentions, move the ball, and avoid such ineptitude as the debacle against Dallas on Sunday night. That’s why I think it could be wise to develop an expanded use of a 2-tights set, to best use the resources that we all know they have. And, of course, splitting Davis or Cooley out should be incorporated into the gameplan. Even further, imagine having a 2-TE set with Yoder in the backfield, as a platooning FB and/or potential target. Confuse the heck out of the opposing D as many times as possible…
by Dixie's Football Pride on Dec 30, 2009 11:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Cooley or Davis?
Not so fast on trading one of our great TEs. We finally have depth at a key position, and already we want to trade one of them? Let’s hang onto both until we see how the offseason progresses. If it does come to a trade, the value of a good TE will only increase as teams get desperate if their starter goes down in camp (Think Jason Taylor here – how many picks did he cost us?) If we don’t run many dual-TE formations – then start! Obviously the one-TE formations did nothing for us this season. And let’s not forget what brought about this conversation – Cooley going on IR. What if we trade one of these guys and the same thing happens to the remaining TE in 2010? Then what?
The only trades we should be considering now are vets who could offer other teams some depth in exchange for mid-late round picks. Portis (and Campbell?) come to mind for this type of transaction. We also need to give Bruce Allen a chance to bring in some football people to put our front office and scouting staff in order.
Not sure who would be a good choice for HC. Shanahan didn’t do much post-Elway, but I don’t know who else is out there right now. I think the key to attracting a good HC is to demonstrate that Allen is really running the show, not just a front for Snyder. Good coaches are attracted to good organizations, and right now we just don’t have that in Washington. Hopefully that turns around quickly.
cooley
cooley is a proven vet,yet still young no way u trade him,i like fred davis,but come on 8 games started and people are ready to get rid of proven pro bowl TE! keep both for now,i dont know if its possible but could fred be a wr,might be to slow on routes,but just a thought if not,keep the depth and run 2 TE sets! i just cant see trading cooley for a player who has had 4-5 good games!
by the fantasy king on Dec 29, 2009 4:17 PM EST reply actions
Cooley Davis Yoder Sellers and Williams
Unfortunately I think one of them will be going unless we move Yoder over to replace Sellers’s backup. Point is between Cooley Davis Yoder Sellers and Williams one if not two will probably be going.
I say have Yoder be the backup FB
he’s a good third TE and special teamer and has done well at FB this year.
by BayAreaBullet on Dec 30, 2009 4:53 AM EST up reply actions
I think it'll be hard for the new management
of a rebuilding franchise to justify keeping around an ancient back-up, even if he is as reliable as Yoder has been. I like Yoder as a player (because he can block) but I think he will be following Todd Collins out the door so we can make our roster younger.
You think they will want another young guy
when Davis and Cooley are young? If they cut Yoder I doubt it is for his age.
by BayAreaBullet on Dec 30, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions
it couldn't be for any other reason though
SpotieOtieDopalicious
haha
do we really wanna go down that road? We wouldn’t have a team if we cut people based on them missing blocks.
How often do you see him make mistakes like that though?
SpotieOtieDopalicious
It's not like the team has had a lot of on-field experience with PAs
so I’m giving him a bye on that one.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
We do have the only
Fake Field Goal specialist ever to go to the Pro Bowl, so I’m confident of your assessment.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I think
A 2nd rounder is way too low an asking price for Cooley. I’m not saying you could get more, but do we really want to trade an in-his-prime, pro bowl player for an unknown commodity? Sure, Fred Davis was a 2nd rounder, and he has shown flashes. But would you trade Cooley for a Malcolm Kelly caliber player? And I’m not talking about WR, I’m talking about a guy who has yet to PROVE he belongs. No, I’d rather keep Cooley. Now, if we can get a young, STARTING o-linemen or), I’d take it. As for the Shockey comparison, they traded him because he was a pain in the ass. And, really, what good did it do them? Kevin Boss is not in the same league as Shockey. Maybe Davis is as good as Cooley (BIG maybe), but, in that case, why not keep them both? So what if 2 tight end sets aren’t “traditional”. Use the advantage we already have, instead of HOPING for another one. Cooley, Davis, and Thomas could prove to be “the Posse” on steroids – a triple threat of receivers who are hard to cover and even harder to bring down.
by CJHutch on Dec 30, 2009 2:35 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I would argue
that two TE sets are far more traditional than half the crap you see in the league these days, between spread formations and 4 or 5 receiver sets. To me, 2 TE sets harkens back to the days of smash-mouth football. There will be 5 OL on the field no matter what the personnel package is, so who is coming off the field to bring in that 2nd TE? Its usually a WR. More people with their hands in the dirt = better football, in my opinion. I like your
"the Posse" on steroidsgets me fired up just thinking about it.
Ding, ding...
Exactly…old-school, fundamental football, with a focus on maximizing strengths and the goal of identifying glaring holes, in order to expand on the offensive scheme when those holes are eventually filled. It’s not stylistically flashy, but building for the future, while still moving the ball and scoring with what resources are currently available, is what puts W’s in the left column and butts in the seats; get it done however possible.
by Dixie's Football Pride on Dec 30, 2009 12:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
As a Bengals fan
I know we could use a good pass-catching TE who is also a capable blocker. Davis or Cooley could be a good fit, assuming Davis isn’t a flash in the pan like some people mentioned above. Make it happen!
fred davis
did get an excessive celebration penalty on one of his tds, so he should fit in with the Bengals.
All they would need to do is
get him to beat up his girlfriend from time to time and he would be a real fit.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Cooley is a REAL REDSKIN!
Cooley loves the Skins and D.C(+MD+VA) loves Cooley.
Davis is younger and has more value. I believe we can trade him for a first round pick(late first.) Although, I see Shanahan trading Cooley because he is older. I hope Snyder intervenes…i cant believe i said that.
Orakpo!!! Russel Okung next year!
Oh so beware of what you wish for...
Even if it’s for the right thing, it will open Pandora’s box and he will never get his sticky fingers out of it again.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Lets look at the big picture
First off, hello everyone I’m new to this relatively but I’ve been reading you all posts for awhile now. Okay back to the topic…yea everyone loves Cooley as we all should but Davis is not a fluke. He’s alot more explosive and more importantly…younger; huge upside. If we could get a second round pick for Cooley, that carries more value than Cooley alone. Even if Cooley is better than Davis, its a small dropoff at a not that demanding position for possibly the best or second best interior lineman in the draft or perhaps a stud linebacker; now thats more valuable. And not to mention, after cooley’s injury whose to say he’ll ever be the same, his value is at its highest right now, why not capitalize, sorry Cooley.
by mr.snyderhireme on Dec 31, 2009 12:40 AM EST reply actions
Welcome!
Now go back under the rock you crawled out from!! Nahhh…just kiddin.
It’s a painful thing to contemplate, but it could be to the betterment of the team. I just don’t trust these guys to a) get what Cooley’s worth, and b) actually make a selection with the draft pick that will contribute and be a net positive on the deal. Maybe there is a trade in there somewhere that would work.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Thank You...I Think?
A second round pick is huge…there’s still first round talent their and we’ll have two picks in that one round. I think we could use a linebacker or an end with 1 or 2 o-lineman.
by mr.snyderhireme on Dec 31, 2009 11:46 AM EST reply actions
We need multiple positions - OT, OG, OLB, RB, FS, QB, etc.
And we are in a unique position with 2 very good TEs (Yoder isn’t too shabby either). If we can get a mid-2nd or higher for either Cooley or Davis, we’ve got to make it happen.
I agree
But i think linebacker or lineman has waaaaaay more value. Good scouting can land us a rb in the later rounds and even an developmental project at Qb can pan out in the later rounds, that way we dont have to give him top dollar. And if I’m not mistaken the under the radar qb’s at smaller schools tend to be very successful and if not… hey can’t call him a bust because he was a late round pick
by mr.snyderhireme on Dec 31, 2009 1:09 PM EST reply actions
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????????????
CHRIS COOLEY IS THE DEFINITION OF WHAT A REDSKIN IS AND SHOULD BE!!! HE SHOULD NEVER WEAR ANOTHER UNIFORM OTHER THAN THE SKINS FOR THE REST OF HIS CAREER!!! That said, Davis has been great filling in, BUT, he def isnt worth keeping in place of Cooley. Chris is proven and a excellent player on the field and locker room. Davis has a couples yrs left on his contract. Lets see if he can duplicatehis production. Instead of using 2 TE sets to get them both in the game put one in the slot or even in the backfield at FB to change some things up. Dont get me wrong though, I love Sellers as well. Hard working and a good leader. Maybe instead of just talent on the field we also need to look at quality people as well so we dont end up with the probs that other teams have had with players that cause probs. Again, COOLEY STAYS!!!!!!
Yes Yes Yes We All love Cooley
For all the Davis doubters have no fear. He is the the truth. And will be a BEAST! Especially in a Shanahan offense. But yes their is stiil a small risk but I see a bigger reward. Keep Davis (more dynamic than Cooley). Get an interior lineman or best (maybe second best) linebacker in the draft makes waaayyy more sense to me. Lets face it guys TE position is not nearly as important as others. Why keep both, it doesn’t make sense at all. Who in the hell wants an double TE offense!! PLEASE!!! That’ll be too easy to cover and not to mention Davis is a weapon not really hardnose kinda TE that likes to put his hands in the dirt every play. We need to get him in the open field not make the defense put 8 in the box like they always do aginst us
by mr.snyderhireme on Dec 31, 2009 1:47 PM EST reply actions
A GOOD SITUATION TO BE IN
Both Davis and Cooley can Co-exist and help improve the Redskins passing game. First of all, Chris is a very crafty and intelligent football player. His pass catching and route running makes him a hard cover for Linebackers and Defensive Ends. And too, he is too strong for the average size Cornerback. Cooley is far a better run blocker. I would suggest moving Cooley to Fullback, allowing him to be more involve in all aspects of the offensive game. At the moment, Sellers is holding down that position, yet he is not the player Cooley is. Cooley’s pass catching ability and blocking skills far exceed Sellers’. In the West Coast Offense, you need a FB that can heavily produce in both offensive schemes. Cooley will easily solve this problem. Also, he is about 6 years younger than Sellers, who is on the down side of a solid career. In Davis, you are getting a player destint for greatness. He has displayed great hands, great speed and quickness at the position, field awareness and decent route running in his second season. Davis has relished the opportunity giving to him by Cooley’s injury and is looking for a greater role in the offense in 2010. Washington did not spend a second round pick on a player to remain a backup. Eventually, he was to spill Cooley at the position, however, that time has come sooner than expected. Rid the team of Sellers and look forward to the mismatches both Cooley and Davis will provide in the passing game, assuming both remain teammates and offensive starters in a DYSFUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION. I can visualize both Cooley and Davis catching 60 balls apiece next season as Wide Receivers Kelly and Thomas continue progress into legitimate NFL WRs. Both have showed promise, yet neither has made the impact Davis has when given the opportunity. The future looks bright at the skill positions. Now just sign Campbell to a 3-year deal so the development can continue. The 2010 Draft needs are OLs, LBs and RBs. Washington is a few good picks from being a team builded for playoff contention.
nice...but i disagree
i’d mucha rather have an additional 2nd rounder to add another lineman or linebacker. Lets remember our strength here. DEFENSE! We have to continue to build around our young talent ORAKPO and also haynesworth. To me thats more value then having two legit tight ends. We can get a starter at linebacker in the 2nd round easy. Keeping our defense strong is more important than anything or we’ll have waisted talent, let get astable and keep it. There is also a slight posssibility that Cooley won’t return in the same form after that injury.
"build around our young talent"
Exactly.
Build around the young guys who have shown some skill and will be around for a while. Orakpo, Thomas, and Davis have shown some good stuff.
Continue improving the defense and spend a few years rebuilding the o-line so that whatever QB we have back there will have an easier time using our young receiving weapons.
Let’s see what Bruce Allen can do.
by DCtoAustralia on Jan 1, 2010 7:21 PM EST up reply actions
We Have Bigger Needs To Address
We have bigger problems we are in dire need of a coach and respective coaches for the offense and defense next step would be to acquire some youger talent for our linebacker corps and last but least is Collins our QB or not make a decision then implement a system and let him develop rather than learning a different system every year.Cooley and Davis will work it self out think about it either player could be succeptible to sustain injury next season leaving us a very capable backup anyway the chips fall keep them both.
Pro Bowl caliber = Fred Davis....?
Dude did you say Fred davis and Pro Bowl in the same sentence? Woah easy now.
Davis is a nice backup who can’t block a lick..repeat…a TE that can’t block…OK
and
>> After all, both are better than Jeremy Shockey
child please… I’m a life long Skins fan…but neither of these guys is better than Shockey…and Davis isn’t even a starter….

by 








![Beat the Caption (Peter King edition): "Chris, if your wife let you have one night with another man, would you pick Brett Favre like me?"
[Picture from Matt Terl]](http://cdn2.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/63592/20393096-896e4388fa4b8e430579dea6bae806a4.4a71f88e-scaled_small.jpg)
















