The Devil's Advocate view of Mr. Snyder
It seems like almost all the fans here want to bad-mouth the Danny as (take your choice of) the Devil Incarnate, or at best a fool, who has destroyed the RedSkins. What do I know or think I know about the Danny?
Has ANY owner in the league spent more of HIS money to try and improve the team? (The other side of the coin is would you want an owner who was to cheap to ever sign a notable free agent?) Or a HIGHLY regarded Head Coach? (Forget Jim Zorn, who appears to be a very nice person with a decent background but.....
I don't know but certainly strongly suspect that the free agents signees and the Head Coach signees were made with not only the eager collusion of supposed football "experts" but at their instigation. You don't actually think the Danny is so dumb he would commit millions and the team's future without a thorough back-ground check of the potential signee/Coach?
If you do think Danny is that dumb, please tell me how he made all that money. I'm pretty dumb too so perhaps I could get my fingers into some of that largesse.
Is there anyone, I SHOUT ANYONE! who doubts that Danny is a life-long, numero uno Redskin fan?
Here's the big one! Be honest with yourself now! Were you happy when he signed Steve Spurrier? Happy when Joe Gibbs came back? Happy with the signing of Haynesworth? Happy with most of the other free agent signings? If you were, then you went along with the 'experts' from ESPN, FOX, CBS, CNBC , The Sporting News, Sports Illustrated, etc etc etc.
35 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good call.
I view Snyder’s situation much in the same light I view Bush’s presidency. He has all of the greatest intentions but he has surrounded himself with all the wrong people which has been the biggest cause for his perceived failure as an owner.
He’s a passionate fan just like the rest of us. Sure he get’s a little grimey with the business side but I don’t doubt his desire to put a consistent winner on the field. He’ll get it right.
Thanks for posting this.
And Dan can speak English and read!!
W – not so much…. :)
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Great comparison
"It was one of those things where everyone in the building was suddenly excited again," Cerrato said. "And all the women in the building were the most excited. They couldn't believe we were getting the guy from "Dancing With the Stars."
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 29, 2009 8:44 AM EST up reply actions
The Danny
I agree. He made one huge mistake – hiring Jim Zorn – but otherwise has done his best. He has to make some decisions – it is his money and his team – and it is fatuous to think that he wouldn’t be involved at all.
Smart marketer....
does not equal smart football owner. Does Dan Snyder want to win? Of course he does, he just doesn’t know how to go about it and is too arrogant to let someone else who does help him. There seems to be a lot of selective memory regarding Snyder, you really think hiring Zorn was his only big mistake? there are 32 owners in the NFL, there’s a reason the only ones you can name are the extremely successful and the extremely incompetent. If you can’t be the extremely successful at least try to blend in with all the average owners.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
“Were you happy when he signed Steve Spurrier? Happy when Joe Gibbs came back? Happy with the signing of Haynesworth? Happy with most of the other free agent signings?”
I was almost as mad as I am now when the Redskins fired Marty to hire a college coach who was almost as arrogant as Dan Snyder.
I was happy when Joe Gibbs came back because I thought he could bring some class back to the organization.
Wasn’t sure how to feel about Haynesworth, thought he had some character issues and I would’ve liked to see the money go to many other players. However, Albert has shown me something, and I like him as a Redskin. There are precious few other free agent signings I could say the same about, London Fletcher was a great signing.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
Good business does not equal good football
IDan’s #1 objective as an owner is to make money. He is incredibly successful at that. #2 objective is to have a winning team. Clearly he falls a bit short in that category. He should write checks, listen to his GM, shut up, and enjoy making his money off a (hopefully) successful team. f I won a billion dollars in the lottery tomorrow and bought the Redskins, I would realize I am 0% qualified to make personnel decisions. Dan has not had such an epiphany, and doubt he ever will. If he continues to let his ego run the team, we will be a mediocre team for another decade. Until fans stop buying concessions and Redskins-licensed stuff, he’ll continue to run this team into the ground
Snyder
I think he mostly wants a winning team, but tries to make money, too. Dan certainly knows that he is not an expert at the intracasies of football, and does not try to run the team. But he has to be somewhat involved. Think of the American President, or most bureaucracies. Some decisions – the tough ones, and ones that can get him in trouble – must float to the top, and the boss has to decide them, even though he may not know much about the particular subject. E.g., the President couldn’t let the military invade Iran without his concurrence. So he will supervise Bruce, and together they will supervise the coach, and Dan – like me and all the other contributors to Hogs Haven – would overrule his staff on some issues. E.g., Zorn immediately said Jason was his quarterback; Dan (and I and many others) thought that was a mistake, and Dan and Vinny tried to get a better one, overriding Jim. Very reasonable. But Dan probably did not dictate the draft choices, because he did not know enough about it; the group decided – probably not the best way to do it. I think Dan would have to approve trading Portis or Cooley. Basically, I think all this vitriole and hatred thrown at Dan is just garbage – unfair and stupid. Dan is a smart guy and runs the team as well as he can, and I hope he makes good decisions in the future (as he did in getting Joe Gibbs back)
There are two things about Danny as an owner that I find unforgiveable
and they are related to one another. First and foremost is the lack of vision/continuity for the team as performers on the field (I’m sure he has a marketing plan) that has resulted in so much turmoil. He impatiently pushes for immediate results, which rarely happens in the NFL.
The second is just his personality and general arrogance that I’m afraid will continue to push away top football talent from the FO and contributes to the lack of a vision/plan for the team’s development – other than the FA Chinese Checkers approach – which looks good on paper, yet contributes to negative team morale and a host of other problems.
Talk all you want about Danny’s desire to win, but its not true. He only wants to win if he can take credit for it. Being a moderately passive owner like Bob Craft or Jeff Lurie, who let the pros make the crucial decisions – and win because of it – is not part of an acceptable scenario to Dan. Until he learns that he is the problem, we will all be screwed.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
MOST OF YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK, YOU GOT THE DEVIL PART RIGHT
First of all, you’ll need 1.6 billion to buy the team. Dan has done a good job maximizing his investment. And if you can get him to sell it, there are thousands of fans who will help you come up with the remaining cash you need.
Writing big checks does not make you a good owner. A lot of people spend a lot of money of stupid things. It just hurts them a lot less than it does you and me.
Hiring back a legend, as well as the son of a legend, does not make you a good owner. It means you are utilizing your PR skills to woo the fan base and hope things will turn out OK. So far, they haven’t. Oh well…
And just because analysts think something is a good idea doesn’t make it so. They are paid for their opinions, but they are just that: opinions. If they’re wrong, so what?
Dan may have BEEN a big fan, but what he has turned this team into bears no resemblence to the team he once rooted for, nor is the “fan experience” anything close to what it was when we were winning — and even when we weren’t. Dan has spent 10 years gaining control of the media, the licensing outlets, the restaurant chains, etc. so he can milk every possible dollar out of this enterprise. What he forgot to do was maintain and/or improve the product. It is our loyalty to this franchise that has kept us engaged as fans.
He continues to be financially rewarded while we are being spit on. I don’t think that makes him a good owner.
by savetheskins.com on Dec 29, 2009 6:20 PM EST reply actions
Scott and Save
Scott – that stuff on vision is just baloney – Dan and the others and Bruce all want to build a good football team, meaning good players at all the positions. What does vision have to do with it? And the comments about personality and arrogance, and just wanting credit – how can you spout such baloney? Snyder rarely says anything, and when he does it is usually vague or supportive or hopeful, always humble, never negative in any way. For instance, on the draft, he talks about all the top staff having input, discussing, working out a priority list. What more can he do? Scott – think over what you wrote, and you’ll realize that you have no basis at all for your statements. Save – you don’t have a clue about what Dan is thinking, and you put a negative spin on anything he does. He has a business operation which is separate from the team. I suspect that he cares much more about the football team than the business side, which is probably run by an assistant. If Dan stayed totally out of the football side, he’d probably do even more on the business side. Anyway, you guys just vent over things you know nothing about. Give it a rest!
by Donnio1234 on Dec 30, 2009 12:10 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Donn, what are you talking about ? You say that Scott does not know what he is talking about ..
But what makes you “The keeper of the truth” read your posts guy.You actually think JC is a bottom of the league Qb. His numbers behind a sorry line says otherwise..
by LETJASONPASS on Dec 30, 2009 6:46 AM EST up reply actions
Well said Donnio1234
Unless the detractors above actually know Mr. Snyder personally and are privy in REAL TIME to the decision making process’s involved with the team: I would guess they are exercising their ABSOLUTE right to offer their opinion. No more, no less, no controversy.
Hey everybody!!
I have a great idea. Let’s all just make up a bunch of stuff!! Like the Redskins are NOT a totally dysfunctional organization. That Dan Snyder is an inspiring, caring leader whom his employees adore. His charismatic personality transcends the business side of football into creating a perpetual-motion, behemoth of a football powerhouse executing imaginative game plans at heretofore unheard of levels of athletic prowess and personal sacrifice that translates into a winning tradition without parallel in the world of professional sports..
Led by the steady hand of the visionary Mr. Snyder and his faithful companion, Vinny Cerrato, the Washington Redskins have been a model of consistency in pursuit of the highest ideals of athleticism and teamwork. Pursuit of excellence throughout the organization attracts the best coaches, talent evaluators, and administers one can possibly hope for in a limited market for these exceptional individuals.
With grandfatherly benevolence, he brings the Nation’s First Franchise to the people of the world with a kindness and sensitivity worthy of Gandhi himself. Overly sensitive to these hard economic times and desiring the best for the Redskins Nation, he goes out of his way to cut the costs of going to a Redskins game, while ensuring that luxurious amenities, such as parking and easy ingress/egress to the sports venue, are provided at only moderately astronomic costs, a price structure modeled on the widely accepted $8.00 cheap domestic beer pricing structure. All this with little thought to the bottom line and his personal enrichment.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is YOUR Washington Redskins!!!
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Well said
Right – we all have our opinions, based on how we think things work. I just think this vicious criticism of Snyder – by people who don’t know what happened and why – is crazy and unfair. One background thought is that the Redskins are a very competitive team. The NFL is extremely balanced – little difference in talent between the best and the worst (although that difference appears to have widened a little this year). Just remember how close many of our games were: one good play, one good tackle made (Landry or Hall), one mistake not made, one good break or made field goal, Sellers not missing key blocks, and we could have been 8-8 or even 10-6 and in the playoffs, even with devastating injuries. And Snyder didn’t cause any of the failures. None. He and Cerrato gave Zorn a competitive team. But the coach was lazy and incompetent, and we lost. So be it. Now what?
Don, I can agree with Zorn being incompetent but Lazy ??
What proof do you have of this ? Hey, and this is coming from the guy that thinks Zorn is a pansy.
by LETJASONPASS on Dec 30, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Geez, LJP
You are starting to sound somewhat human. :)
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I'm a little disturbed though about your
first-hand knowledge of Zorn’s panzy-ism.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
I can't agree with you on everything ... Get over it ... LOL
I don’t really understand either one of you guys. He is a Dan Snyder apologist and you are the same but for Jim Zorn.
by LETJASONPASS on Dec 30, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions
Make that
was for Jim Zorn.
You may have notice a change of tune after the large men in blue performed a public sheep shearing in front of 70,000 or so people at Fedex Field.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
LOL , Scott now I guess I can call Zorn a pansy /soft sorry coach and player blamer
and you will not say anything about it ? You will not ask me to prove it ? Wow, I guess the proof is " In the pudding " (giants,cowboys games)?
by LETJASONPASS on Dec 30, 2009 6:17 PM EST up reply actions
I was willing to stick with Zorn as long as the team was playing hard
Not sure what happened between the Oakland game and the Giants debacle, but the team finally gave up and so did I, as far as Zorn goes.
Still like the guy, but….
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Scott E
Hahahahaha. I laffed out loud several times during your long “Hey Everbody” post. Very well done!
Zorn
Lazy is relative, he certainly works harder than I do, and less than Joe Gibbs. Jim says flatly that he does not work late (I don’t remember the exact quote, but it was in response to a question, and was generally that he always ate dinner with his family, did not do all nighters or work 20 hour days like Joe Gibbs did). Nothing wrong with that for normal people, but Jim is a new coach obviously in over his head, so extra work is probably a good idea. My guess (based on results) is that he does not spend as much time on the offensive game plan, or watching film, as he should. He doesn’t do enough on details, or supervising his top assistants. Of course, he can only do so much. But Joe Gibbs (and I think most top coaches, like Jimmy Johnson, who lost his marriage from working too hard) half kill themselves trying to win, and don’t just come to work in the morning. Young lawyers in top law firms work 70 hour weeks. In my life I have seen how “comers” usually work harder than anybody else. You have to “pay the price” to get ahead. My impression is that Jim simply is not competent enough to be an NFL coach (very few are), but also doesn’t work hard enough to succeed. NFL coach is a brutal, draining job, which may be why so many (Johnson, Cowher, Gruden, Billick, now Gibbs part time) quit and just love those analyst jobs; they make a lot of money and have great fun, with none of the heartaches.
Big difference between "lazy"
and family man who does not put in outrageous hours to succeed. I think Zorn knew he was in over his head and that an even approach to the game and his overall situation was the best he could hope for, regardless of the hours he could have put in.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Lazy
Right, “lazy” was a little harsh and judgemental, like you and others are on Snyder. Jim may well have decided to just do “so much” and no more, and was not willing to “pay the price”. I made a similar decision long ago, Steve Spurrier probably decided he wouldn’t pay the price – and just wasn’t willing to do what would be needed to win (work harder, fire most of his old friends), so did the right thing and quit.
Hey everybody
Scott – glad to see you are on board, and thinking more positively (naturally, I take your post literally). Dan would be gratified. By the way, I don’t think Snyder is a bureaucrat or hard worker or detail man as I described – he’s more of an idea man, entrepreneur, gambler, impulsive and mercurial, controlling, doesn’t take orders from anybody, sort of like Donald Trump. He made his fortune partly in advertising, and seems to have really stumbled with Six Flags (another time he picked some good talker and then stuck with him too long). A guy like Snyder would not have the patience or discipline or desire to coach in the NFL – it’s too much work. He’s also more likely to mostly stay out of day to day operations except for setting general policy and a few major decisions. Incidentally, it seems to me that keeping Zorn as long as he has is uncharacteristic of Dan. Maybe Shanahan wouldn’t come during the season, and the Rooney rule inhibited a move, so he finally decided to just write off the season, and wait.
What if
I indicated in a previous post that MAYBE the Big Name coaches would not want to come here. Suppose I was right? Suppose the Medium Name coaches would also not want to come here (unlikely but possible)? Then we might get a relatively unknown, someone who was an assistant in a less then top notch organization.? We could coin a phrase and perhaps call it “The Zorn Rule”?
The Zorn Rule only works if you have to
interview at least one prominent coach from a top notch organization prior to making your less than desirable “Zorn Replacement” hire.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
NOT GIVING IT A REST UNTIL SNYDER BACKS OFF
How absurd for one blogging fan to attack another with the contention that “you don’t knw what you’re talking about…”. C’mon, this is all sports babble. We all invest as much time, or as little, as we want to. HOWEVER, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that Dan doesn’t know how to run a football team. All you have to do is look around the league at teams with good owners, strong GMs and competant coaches – we don’t need to know what Dan does in his office. As for what he runs and how he runs it, you need only read the accounts of those who have worked with him to know HOW he does it. Fear, micromanaging and an unwillingness to listen to those on his payroll. If the public humiliation of coaches and others hasn’t already given you something you still seem to be lacking…a clue.
We all want this to work. EXCUUUUUUSE me if I continue to be skeptical. Dan has proven nothing to me in regard to how he intends to fix this. Hiring a GM won’t mean squat if the Dan is still making all the decisions. And, yes, I know he doesn’t have to prove anything to anyone, he owns the team. But it’s not his plaything. It USED to be something quite special and we are now almost a generation away from those good times.
So let’s hope Dan makes a new year’s resolution and REALLY let’s Allen do his job. Let’s hope a REAL coach is brought in. And let’s stop bashing Zorn for doing a job he was never qualified for and didn’t ask for. He’s a decent guy who doesn’t deserve to be public flogged. I hope he takes the money and runs.
I’d like him to sell the team, but I have a better chance at winning the lottery – so I’m buying a ticket and a few scratch-offs.
Happy New Year, ladies and gentlemen!
by savetheskins.com on Dec 31, 2009 9:57 AM EST reply actions
You’re not allowed to refer to him as Dan, its Mr.Snyder.
I think you secretly have a man crush on him.
by Parks Smith on Dec 31, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
cheatin
alotta money is made by price gouging. gas- just last yr & yr before. businesses charging anything they want because theyre a business. your government isnt complaining – theyre on the receiving end & in on the problem. thats how people get rich by others hard work & legally stealing money.

by 
























