Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

Final Season Projections for JC



These are the projected numbers for JC to finish out the season:

Atts     Comp         Yds         TD         INT        Comp %
310     460           3700         22         15           66%

 

Aside from the record, Jason has shown toughness behind a beat up OL. He had taken some vicious hits, yet shows his resiliancy time and time again. He has progressed throughout the season. He is better making his progressions, and going to his check downs. It seems he is using audibles more often at the line of scrimmage.  He will likely put up the best stats of his career.  So I ask, is this enough to keep him in Washington?

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

LOL

Probably not… unless he throws for 5500 40TDs… Snyder is not impressed. The Snyder turns his nose at progress… foolish mortal.

JJ Fe

by Rydaddy617 on Dec 14, 2009 9:42 AM EST reply actions  

Go JC

Still to bad he will be with a different team next year

by washfan29 on Dec 14, 2009 10:10 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Jason Remains

Unless someone decides to give up draft picks to sign him.

Redskins keep JC17, with a restricted free agent tender which requires at least a 1st round compensation. Another team gives up the 1st round compensation JC17 is gone otherwise he’s a Redskin in 2010

Business, pure and simple

by dr WNC on Dec 14, 2009 10:11 AM EST reply actions  

He can be traded after signing the offer sheet, if he is unrestricted. So they could take less than a first round pick for him. He is going to be one of the ‘hot’ FA in the off-season, so Danny wil try to sign him!

by liger99 on Dec 14, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

agree

Point is JC is either a Redskins or another team provides compensation.

It is not JC17’s decision…

by dr WNC on Dec 14, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Progress sounds suspiciously

like “player development.” We can’t have that, can we?

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Dec 14, 2009 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Player development

Is NOT, I repeat, is NOT allowed by this organization.

by bigrm18 on Dec 14, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

But you forget

The Gruesome twosome are both deaf, dumb & blind, most skins fans want to keep campbell & use our draft picks to strenthen the Oline, but whats are the chances of that happening with Snyderatto in charge. ??

by mo19678 on Dec 15, 2009 1:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Gawd, I hope they keep Jason next year.

But if he IS traded, I’ll still be a big fan of his.

So long as he doesn’t ever go to the Cowboys.

Or Eagles. Or Giants. Or Patriots.

"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"

by DbacksSkins on Dec 15, 2009 12:45 PM EST reply actions  

listen

We need the team to RUSH the hell out of the ball for the rest of the season… We need JC17 to stay. If he plays his ass off and become unrestricted FA we lose him and Danny boy wastes a pick on a rookie… If he keeps his numbers down he becomes restricted and we can afford to keep him…

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Dec 15, 2009 7:45 PM EST reply actions  

I disagree

It is all but garanteed that next year is uncapped and jason is a restricted free agent, therefore we need him to boost his numbers 1 so that Snyder may have no choice but to keep him and 2 because if he still doesn’t wanna keep him we can get picks from another team by tendering him.

by skinsfan28 on Dec 16, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

The evil truth of it in a nuts hell.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Dec 16, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

No

If he gets unrestricted FA he can go to anyone that that bids the most. I dont think Danny boy likes him enough to outbid other teams for a long period of time. If he is restricted he can pay less and make it say a 2 year deal instead of a 5-7 year deal. If he keeps Campbell it would be on a very limited basis.

He wants a Romo, or Farvre or a Manning type of QB. a Jersey selling QB. (Not to put Romo in any of thier leagues but he sells the most jerseys) Someone that makes the headlines because they ate a hotdog in practice… WTF!!! Camppbell does not make the dollars for him enough to keep him…

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Dec 16, 2009 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Small
General Manager Me
Small
So here's the thing about Peyton Manning...
Small
Trading Back
Paterno_tribute_small
How Stupid Giants Fans Are
Small
Updated 2012 NFL Mock Draft
Nba_finals________small
Defining the perfect quarterback
Stewey_small
Redskins getting RGIII is in Matt Flynn's hands. Cleveland's dominant draft firepower!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins