Where will JC play in 2010
by sofutomygaha on Nov 25, 2009 11:01 AM EST
16 comments
The Redskins are, as predicted, scouting college QBs. This is due diligence- any team in our position would do the same. Nonetheless, it inspires me to post this poll.
My personal opinion? JC has paid his dues, and is about to be rewarded. Assuming that Favre does retire this time, he will go to camp with the Vikings and compete with Jackson for the starting roll. Then, we'll see what Campbell does behind a solid offensive line. My bet is he proves to be a much better passer than Jackson.
0 recs |
16 comments
Email
Print
Comments
I like the Panthers...
But man, there really are a lot of QB opportunities. I can’t see why he’d want to stay here.
by KevinE on Nov 25, 2009 1:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm with the panthers
The only hope inspite of themselves, Jason remains a restricted free agent, NO CBA rules, and either provides draft picks or stays with the redskins.
by dr WNC on Nov 25, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Riddance JC
Maybe Al Davis can provide you an offensive line you can blame your future failures on in Oakland.
by williamhudsonlink on Nov 30, 2009 9:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shame, Shame
Shame on the FFO, for how Jason has been treated. It’s about 100% likely he will go elsewhere and improve whatever team he goes to. It’s also about 100% that whomever plays QB for us next year will not be as good. The only player with the slightest chance would be Colt Brennan unless they go to a completely different system.
We are sooooo F’d!!
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 25, 2009 2:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Early returns
This is pretty interesting, actually. We’ve got 10/23 members who think that JC stays. Is this wishful thinking from the BOLA faction?
I don’t think I agree that whoever plays for us next year will not be as good. I think that the mostly likely scenario is we draft a “QB-of-the-future” and sign a veteran like Chad Pennington or Jon Kitna. I think JC is better than what we’re watching, but I’m not ready to say he’s better than those guys.
Or Brett Favre… HAHAHAHAHAH…
…
…ha?
by sofutomygaha on Nov 25, 2009 3:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Vikings
It just makes way too much sense… stays in a similar WCO (Zorn and Childress arent that far away on the holmgreen coaching tree) and finally gets to play with the dominant rb/defense combo that many tried to talk up in this town. He even gets to work with Favre for a short period of time and hopefully pick up a little of his gunslinger mentality.
by dt3 on Nov 25, 2009 5:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Remember
Campbell was never intended to be a WCO QB in the first place. Gibbs drafted him to be a playaction, 5-7 step drop QB.
I for one think we should resign him to a short contract and give him a line that would let him make more then one progression. That’s if he wants to return.
I'm worried about the beer supply. After this case, and the other case, there's only one case left- Barney Gumble
by CptChaosSidekick on Nov 25, 2009 11:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
My ideal dream for the draft
Does anyone think this is possible: knowing full well that snyder loves his shiny toys, and everyone expects him to go for a QB he uses the ruse and gets the best OL men out there.
I'm worried about the beer supply. After this case, and the other case, there's only one case left- Barney Gumble
by CptChaosSidekick on Nov 25, 2009 11:39 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Cpt ChaosSidekick
Surley with that name you are Vinny Cerrato in disguise right????
so you should be able to tell us what is happening!!
ON a serious note, any chance Campbell sees a Parcells as a shiny toy, that would be the best present he could buy
Pommylee
by Pommylee on Nov 25, 2009 11:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bills
could be a perfect fit for campbell. He is clearly better than their current QB’s, and we all know a change is comming in Buff. If wilson shells out BIG CASH for the next head coach, and makes some nois in FA, he may not have the $$$ to pay a high profile QB as his #1 choice. The Bill would be in an ideal situation to trade down in the draft as they are in need of soooo much help. WR, OT and DT are 3 glaring needs. They could get Campbell for a helluva lot cheaper than a 1st rd drafted QB, then trade down in the draft and get a late 1st and another 2nd with wich they can select their stud DT, and get a WR and OT in the second.
by Tiller56 on Nov 26, 2009 8:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice thoery.....
one of the more sound arguments…….same argument could be made to keep him as well….good post
by shvd98z24 on Nov 27, 2009 12:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He is staying here if they are smart..
"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"
by milcmann on Dec 2, 2009 9:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
milcmann
can you please school your boy williamhudson.
you are not, and never have been a <jc apologist but you do actually watch the games and know what’s actually going on.
SpotieOtieDopalicious
by Rekka on Dec 3, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
roger that
JC could fall off a cliff after next season for all I care. After that we can afford the cap and or the draft for a new QB… Right now though he can work for us as long as we have a running game. Without the running game he buggs the hell out…. we need a line and that is the bottom line.. That is the most key piece of any team… If you have a line that holds back the D for a good amount of time and opens gaps for the run… Hell you can make any offense look good… That front 5 must be what we fix in the draft first and foremost…
Dont get me wrong I hate Campbell with a passion but keeping him a little longer is better than drafting a rookie and not getting a line…. You can take that to the bank..
"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"
by milcmann on Dec 4, 2009 12:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
