Pour Some Sugar On Me - One More Year For Zorn Edition
We are now through Week 2 of the Sherm Lewis experiment. In two weeks, we have managed 17 points per game. Hmmmm...that strikes me as EERILY similar to our offensive output for the last few years. You guys mentioned it yesterday and it bears repeating--the adjustments that were made at halftime were reminiscent of the kind of adjustments that made previous teams in this town famous. Sherm Lewis put something together in the second half that resembled a legit offense. His play-calling skills are sharpening to be sure. Part of my problem with this setup though is that it adds yet another category on the Spin-the-Wheel of excuses that every TV analyst on ESPN and Fox is using for their explanation for why this team continues to struggle. So no matter how successful Sherm is, it becomes impossible to separate his role as "consultant" from the circus that is our front office. If we started winning, it would be easier to ignore that aspect. But that leads me into my other issue with this whole setup. At 2-6, is the Sherm Lewis experiment more about saving our season or saving Vinny Cerrato's job? Nobody wants this team to win more than me/us. But I am seriously conflicted with regard to my rooting for Sherm Lewis. The complexity of this soap opera is hilarious. One character in this thing though that I find myself more and more drawn to is Jim Zorn.
Partly because I believe that Jim Zorn is the kind of man that is worth giving every chance to and partly because I don't think a quality coach is going to come here with genuine intentions I just want to say that Jim Zorn should be our coach next year. First let's talk about...well, the first part. It is not Jim Zorn's fault that Dan Snyder hired a guy who may have been a little raw to be the head coach here. In fact, the one thing everyone knew was that Jim Zorn was raw. If Dan Snyder saw something in Jim Zorn that made him think Zorn could be a future successful head coach, then he simply has to be patient. You can't be right about something like that immediately every time. We have come to know since he was hired that Jim Zorn is a man of character and integrity. If Snyder learned anything from Joe Gibbs, it is that character and integrity are the most important things to build a team around. It is what a man does when things aren't going his way that you learn the most about him. To put it mildly, things aren't going his way these days. Zorn is not running from the challenge. Do any of us honestly blame Zorn for the offensive line problems? Cerrato rolled the dice big time and it cost Zorn any chance to get his offense going. Finally, we have fired coach after coach after coach. At some point it is not the coach (although at multiple points in our past...it was the coach...hehehe.)
As for my assertion that no good coach is going to come here with genuine intentions, I think what I mean is that with the amount of money it is going to cost Snyder, it will be very, very difficult to discern the true motives for anyone stepping into this situation. There are only 32 head coaching jobs in the league. One thing the Raiders have taught us is that even though there is a scarcity of opportunities, qualified candidates can and will decline to enter into a situation that seems problematic (is that putting it nicely enough?) So, here is a press conference I will not buy at all:
Mike Shanahan: "I am excited to work with Vinny Cerrato and Dan Snyder to put this franchise back on the map in the NFL. I think the way they do things here makes a lot of sense and I look forward to participating in the decision-making process."
So whether I am way off on this thing or not, one thing I think I would really like to see is Jim Zorn be given a chance to grow into his job...perhaps with a different guy pulling the strings on the personnel side.
Now on to our award-winning league notes:
Ten Yard Fight: 10 Chances To Make One Good Point
1) You don't go undefeated in this league without some close calls to some teams that have no business playing you tough. That is why you have to circle Sunday, December 6th on your calendars. The Saints travel to Washington, D.C that day, likely with a perfect record. You heard it here first: Skins over the Saints 28-27.
2) Something about Tom Brady that continues to bother me is his insistence on telling people that him and his teammates are motivated by comments made by their opponents leading up to a game. Really? You mean you otherwise wouldn't have done everything in your power to win? You mean you don't expect guys like Joey Porter to forever be running his mouth? In a game where if you give less than 100% for even a second you could end up in a hospital, I simply find it hard to believe that Tom Brady actually cares what guys like Joey Porter says. Just say what you mean...I would buy this:
Tom Brady: "Beating that son of a bitch is so satisfying, given the amount of trash that dude talks."
3) I am wrong about so much...really, I am simply wrong constantly. But not about the Bengals! I have taken so much heat from Steelers and Ravens fans in recent weeks for expressing my belief in Marvin Lewis and Carson Palmer. This week I'd like to thank Brian Leonard for always seeming to know where the 1st down marker is and for playing the way you wish everyone on your favorite team played all the time.
4) Now on to my wrongness...fine, I made the Redskins 10-6 in my preseason predictions. I guess all I can really say now is...THE SKINS ARE GONNA RATTLE OFF 8 STRAIGHT WINS!
5) Who has a better shot at the playoffs? Chicago or Green Bay? I am going with Green Bay because like an idiot, I still think that defense will come around.
6) When Kris Brown missed that field goal against the Colts, I felt like this team might actually be destined to go undefeated. The loss of Bob Sanders and Marlin Jackson should be too much for the Colts to overcome--from a "going undefeated" standpoint. But one thing you always know you can count on...Peyton Manning is capable of outscoring any opponent at any time. He doesn't even need a lot of time to do it. Remember the Dolphins game? Their defense was roundly beaten, but in the 15 minutes he had, Peyton put up enough points to win.
7) Is anyone more quietly in the playoff race than the Jacksonville Jaguars? At 4-4, they are in thick of the AFC playoff race. I just don't know if I buy into that offense fully, but the Garrard/Jones-Drew/Sims-Walker battery is winning me over.
8) Watching the Giants lose is normally so much fun. But when Norv Turner is on the other sideline, some of the joy is sucked out of the experience. Who would you rather have: Eli Manning or Philip Rivers?
9) Tough loss for Mike Singletary and the 49ers. A win would have gotten them to .500. That division was squarely in their sights but now at 3-5 (after starting 3-1), they have a lot of work to do in the second half of the season. They came in with one of the stingiest run defenses in the league. Chris Johnson got his though didn't he?
10) If Matthew Stafford would have thrown only 2 or 3 interceptions, they might have won. But FIVE? I have Stafford on my fantasy team and I had to play him because mark Sanchez was on a bye (yeah, my team sucks). Every time the Lions had the ball, I would think, "OK, a chance for some points." Then the graphic would come up that it was Seattle's ball. Really? No...another pickle? You're killing me dude.
Give Me The Numbers, Stat!
In case any of you missed it on the Monday Night Football telecast, here are the last 7 first round picks by the Pittsburgh Steelers:
2003 - SS Troy Polamalu
2004 - QB Ben Roehtlisberger
2005 - TE Heath Miller
2006 - WR Santonio Holmes
2007 - LB Lawrence Timmons
2008 - RB Rashard Mendenhall
2009 - DE Ziggy Hood
It should be noted that for the most part this team picks late in the 1st round, so maybe that explains the lack of a top offensive tackle selection. Their line is certainly in good shape though.
Last week's picks: 2-2
This week's picks:
49ers over Bears
Jets over Jacksonville
Colts over Patriots
Bengals over Steelers
2 recs |
121 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
You are going to get torn up about Zorn......
but I agree. We need some kind of consistency, and no matter what you say or think about him, he is always classy. He has been shit all over this season and yet he stands in front of cameras and gives honest, thoughtful answers. We have a guy that is up to the challenge. He is willing to drag his name through the mud, stick up for these players, and coach with the same passion we cheer with! To me, Zorn is a Redskin! Good post Sugar……I just barely squeeked by you on fantasy last night!!!! Thank goodness for Roethlisberger and the Steelers defense!
by shvd98z24 on Nov 10, 2009 7:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Let me be the first this morning-ZORN is not the answer
I do agree on Zorn, as it appears:
I believe that Jim Zorn is the kind of man that is worth giving every chancethe ability to stay with the organization is one thing to remain the head coach is another, he is in over his head.
It is not Jim Zorn’s fault that Dan Snyder hired a guy who may have been a little raw to be the head coach here. In fact, the one thing everyone knew was that Jim Zorn was raw. If Dan Snyder saw something in Jim Zorn that made him think Zorn could be a future successful head coach, then he simply has to be patient.And yes he was offered the job and he took the job knowing he was in over his head. He is not a leader, He is not a coach who inspires greatness, he is a coach who is a coach in teaching…a great positional coach, could be an ok coordinator but will not be and should no longer be a head coach IMO
With you on the Saints…
by dr WNC on Nov 10, 2009 7:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
More Zorn???!
Teams that are well-coached don’t give up huge penalties, miss tackles, or lose 12 out of 16 games as we have.
I would rather have Steve Spurrier than Zorn again. The fact that a major Redskins fan actually thinks we should keep Zorn actually sickens me.
Zorn is a nice guy. Anyone who is close to the Redskins would say that. But Zorn is not a leader, nor is he a good coach. We saw what happened to the Dolphins when they hired Parcells and Sparano, who changed the personnel and the culture in Miami within moments of getting there.
That needs to happen here. We need a real GM who can honestly evaluate talent and a coach who has a legitimate system who can tailor it to be compatible with the personnel we have. This hasn’t happened to the full extent in years. Even Gibbs was missing key pieces in personnel.
by mmford10 on Nov 10, 2009 8:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
wow...Spurrier?
That is shocking. Really? You would rather have Spurrier over Zorn?
by Sugar on Nov 10, 2009 9:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is mmford10 a girl?
I’m just curious because usually Ken makes girls sick all the time. How do you feel that you mde a dude sick this time, Ken. You suck.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 10:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i am indeed a man... are girls even allowed on here?
and one who exaggerated the idea that i’d rather have spurrier than zorn. Besides, that’s not the issue we’re discussing anyway. Regardless, the team looks exactly like it did during those miserable, dark Spurrier years: undisciplined, overmatched, and underachieving.
the fact remains that Zorn has to go. In the NFL, when something’s going bad, sometimes all you need is a shake-up. Parcells/Sparano, Josh McDaniels, Mike Singletary, Joe Gibbs.. these are examples of the kinds of transcendent leaders that can change an entire culture in a locker room.
Sure, we have a reputation of burning through head coaches. But we actually need an overhaul.. and, obviously, that includes axing Vinny as well. I don’t think any of our players would run through a cardboard wall for Jim Zorn, do you?
by mmford10 on Nov 10, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Zorn isn't the problem
I’ll agree that his coaching style is not the best fit for a team that has been completely shredded by injuries and has had its confidence crushed over and over again, that seems to screw up in new and increasingly more baffling ways every week.
But I sincerely believe that if given talent to build from, Zorn can be incredibly successful because of his ability to bring people together, communicate effectively, and take the sort of chances that proves to his team that he has confidence in them.
The suspect play of key pieces of the team this year (the OLine and the Secondary) has created a situation in which the players have no confidence in their ability to compete over 4 quarters. Zorn obviously deserves blame for not being able to inspire that confidence and get his guys to overachieve. But he and the other coaches can only do so much with the talent they have to work with.
Campbell has basically been ruined because of the Line. He doesn’t look up the field because he has to watch his blind side. Add that to his complete emasculation in the offseason and its no wonder he is struggling. Its a damn shame, because he has the physical tools, but mentally he’s cooked.
I don’t think Zorn should get a free pass, but I do think our new GM next year, in his quest to redefine the culture, should consider the fact that the system probably deserves one more year to find success and that Zorn is hardly symptomatic of the broken culture. If anything, his positivity and ‘medium’ mentality could be good for a rebuilding team.
by Boo. on Nov 10, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Balance is key
I had two wrestling coaches in highschool that came in before my junior year and we turned our record from about 10-8 the year before to 17-1 after they came in. the Head coach had the exact same personality as Zorn from the way he talked to the way he ran practice (with music) and the way the team enjoyed working with him. The assistant Coach was the exact opposite hard nosed, brutal practices, and wrestle dirty (not illegally but do what it takes to win) If you can’t beat them technically let them know they’ve been in a fight.
My point is that with a good compliment as a defensive coach, someone who can lite a fire under the teams ass while Zorn brings the team to together and focus’s that fire against the opposing team, we could have an excellent Coaching staff without going thru a new system by dumping Zorn.
One way players on a team come together is by complaining about the A-hole coach that runs a hard practice while loving the easy practice coach (Zorn) and his practicing to music.
Our Locker room was split into about 3 groups before those 2 coaches came in and brought us together by our admiration and like of the well mannered, genuinly nice guy head coach as well as our dis-like but respect for the Punch you in da Mouff assistant coach who demanded results and would literally kick you out of the practice room if you didn’t bring 110% to each practice.
by skinsfan28 on Nov 10, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey bud- are you by any chance from Winchester, VA, because I had the EXACT same thing happen when I was a wrestler my junior year! What you say makes perfect sense, and our program turned around three-fold the year coach Rayburn and Biedrycki took over as Head and Assistant coaches, so I can definitely see where this logic might somehow play into what our Skins need to consider incorporating into their system: a hard-nosed East Coast attitude with toughness expressed play-by-play and the will to go the extra little bit to win EVERY TIME and come together as a team that is a force to be reckoned with! Nice post man!
by Mixmastermike on Nov 10, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey bud- are you by any chance from Winchester, VA, because I had the EXACT same thing happen when I was a wrestler my junior year! What you say makes perfect sense, and our program turned around three-fold the year coach Rayburn and Biedrycki took over as Head and Assistant coaches, so I can definitely see where this logic might somehow play into what our Skins need to consider incorporating into their system: a hard-nosed East Coast attitude with toughness expressed play-by-play and the will to go the extra little bit to win EVERY TIME and come together as a team that is a force to be reckoned with! Nice post man!
by Mixmastermike on Nov 10, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm wondering if Zorn didn't learn something important
Sunday (finally). At some point, if you are the leader of this mess you have to put your foot down, stop being the nice guy, and tell it like it is. Maybe now this team will start playing more disciplined football.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 8:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I say only the OL needs to change. And add a RB
Ive been saying this since they hired him- Give the man AT LEAST 3 years. At the begining of last year we were led to believe that Zorn was the second coming of Gibbs. All of that fell apart. This year we thought Jason will be able to make quicker reads and get passes to our young wideouts. This has fell apart. I believe it to be judicious if we
1- Allow Zorn to COMPLETE his contract in full.
2- Draft/Sign FA’s OL/DL (80/20%) only in ’10. Have open competition.
3- Sign JC to a 2 year low risk high incentives contract.
4- Draft QB and RB in ’11.
5- Pray Cerrato dies under conspicuous circumstances in order to get a REAL GM or just fire him.
Patience Bitches.
by TheOverLordMarshl on Nov 10, 2009 9:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I sort of agree
I’ll admit I’ve always sort of been in Zorn and JC’s corner. No two people are trying harder in my opinion and the disastrous season has made me sympathetic to them.
I wouldn’t be against firing Vinny and giving everybody, Zorn and JC included, a second chance to make this work behind a decent O-line in a sane management system. If they did fire Vinny and brought in a good front office crew and they decide that Zorn and JC can’t cut it, I could live with that with the understanding that we’re truly going back to square 1 to do this right. What I couldn’t live with would be getting rid of Zorn and JC but keeping Vinny. Nothing would change and we’d be right back where we are now in two years.
by SkinsOsTerps on Nov 10, 2009 9:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You bring something interesting
What do you think is going to happen with Campbell? He isn’t getting the stats that he should get to go into free agency and make it rich. But he won’t possibly re-sign here, will he? He would have to be crazy to keep coming back for more of what he gets here. I agree that a low-risk, high incentive contract would likely meet the market value, but he I just don’t see him wanting to repeat this season.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I really think
Jason wants nothing to do with this franchise, and I don’t blame him. Its a damn shame. So, wait, does that mean what I think it does for next year?
Colt? Colt?! Colt! Colt! Colt!
I’m gonna be sick…
by Boo. on Nov 10, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you REALLY mean Conspicuous, or did you mean Suspicious?
’cuz Conspicuous means “showy” or “flashy”….
I can believe a lot of Redskins would be appreciative of both, but I’d rather he’s just marooned ala Tom Hanks in Castaway, far, far away… and is rescued in time to be there for our next Superbowl Victory (Parade, not season).
by BillWard on Nov 10, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i vote for
conspicuous. Would be more fun to watch that way.
by grandpa grouse on Nov 10, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure I follow this logic Kenny...
You want Cerrato gone, but you want Zorn to stay? So you’re saying you want the Skins to bring in a new GM, but he has to be forced to live with Zorn and the WCO? That limits who you can bring in as a GM a bit. The other thing is Zorn was very much in the draft process, and it shows his skills of assessing WRs aren’t too high either.
Theismann said in Riggo’s latest video post that Zorn is an excellent QB coach and should stick with that. Zorn obviously improved JC and correctly assessed Cutler and Sanchez. I think leaving Zorn in place to run a WCO off with a bad QB and no offensive line only sets this franchise back more. Blow it up and do it right.
Skins need to re-load and bring in a guy that’s a no non-sense disciplinary.
by KevinE on Nov 10, 2009 9:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just saying get a new GM
and give him a year to grade and evaluate Zorn. If the new guy wants to move to a different coach, I am very okay with that. But Zorn deserves a Vinny-less year to work under a competent personnel man. Perhaps even a guy who can help Zorn better develop his offenive philosophy as well as cater the scheme to guys on the roster.
by Ken Meringolo on Nov 10, 2009 9:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But Zorn's shortcomings are far bigger than being handcuffed with a terrible GM
Zorn is clearly in over his head. If he doesn’t get a veteran OC to help show him the ropes and right the ship, 2010 won’t be much different from this year.
This team has a million problems, and one of them is that Zorn is in over his head.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really, the only way this works
is if the GM is Holmgren. He can mentor Jim on the HC stuff and knows what kind of players the offense needs. He can also get him the OC he needs. If he will resist the idea that he is also HC and just do the GM thing, it could be beautiful and the shortest route to redemption with the least disruption. Just a thought.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is the NFL
This isn’t the California Penal league. Why would we need to bring in somebody to teach the guy we hired to do the job we hired him for? That doesn’t make sense. I say we start with the most qualified GM out there and let that guy make the decisions. We need to go all in with a good, qualified, educated, football GM.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
just b/c we hired him doesn't mean he's qualified
he still needs a lot of help, IMO
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just sayin'
If you are going to keep Zorn, you can’t really do the analog to the now infamous hire the OC then hire the HC maneuver unless it’s a person familiar with the HC. So, IF you keep Zorn the only real option is Holmgren.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+100
Skins need to re-load and bring in a guy that’s a no non-sense disciplinary.
Reloading means:
Zorn not head coach
Vinny out
GM in who hires his own complete coaching staff, players stay or are gone without the cap year…
A complete reload…
by dr WNC on Nov 10, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I posted below but I agree.
A new GM is going to want to things his way. And we want a guy to come in with a new way to do things. Unfortunately, this probably means curtains for Zorn.
At this point in my fanship, I am praying for an uncapped year. But I’m not praying for it for the reason that you think. I see an uncapped year as an out. Its a way to get rid of all the high dollar contracts that we are stuck with. Its really only a couple of big hitters like Portis and Thomas.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
I see an uncapped year as an out. Its a way to get rid of all the high dollar contracts that we are stuck with. Its really only a couple of big hitters like Portis and Thomas.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Get a new GM
and let him decide if Zorn stays or leaves. It wouldn’t work to keep the ex-head coach on as a QB coach or offensive coordinator. That would simply add to our pitiful little soap opera.
by CarverM on Nov 10, 2009 9:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I disgree
But I disagree not because of Zorn. What I want is a total change in the front office. That means a legitimate GM. That is what I want most of all. Unfortunately, when a new GM comes in, he is not going to want Zorn as his coach. He is going to want to go out and get a guy he that gels with his system. This won’t work for a number of reasons:
1) If the new GM is hamstrung with Zorn as directed by Snyder, then we are already screwed because we didn’t bring in a guy with total control.
2) If the GM accepts Zorn, he will spend the first year trying to get rid of him.
3) Our offensive line will not be fixed in one year. Its impossible. This will take a couple of years assuming we use free agency also. Giving Zorn one year will not show any results.
4) Who calls the plays?
5) Who provides the discipline?
6) Will Blatche stay?
There would be a lot of questions to ask but my first priority is a new GM. And I think that will be the end of Zorn and I am okay with that for the chance to succeed in the future.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 9:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
good post. good questions.
The answers seem to point to Zorn needing to go.
I like the guy and I wish things were different, but they’re not. And he can’t stay, IMO
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sugar
I know it’s contoversial to bring up Zorn’s name at this point as the majority of fans are calling for his head. However, I agree with you. We are clearly entering a transition/rebuilding period here for the Redskins, and the most important thing during a period like that is consistency in the scheme and they coaching staffs. The one thing lacking over the last 10 years has been consistency at the QB and coaching positions. I’d like to see us stick with Zorn and Campbell for at least one to two more seasons. I honestly don’t think that it’s Jim Zorns fault that he’s playing with a group of offensive linemen who probably wouldn’t even get back-up rolls with the top 15 teams in the league. Zorn is doing the best he can with what he’s been given. Clearly the problem with this team is that Cerratto consistently ignores the offensive line. In my opinion Cerratto needs to go and Zorn should have a say in who the new GM is. Chemistry between the coach and GM could really help us accellerate the rebuilding process. Zorn needs players that will fit his system. Cerratto knows nothing of drafting players to fit the system, and consistenly expects the coach to adjust his system to fit the players cerratto brings in.
by Kurtstack on Nov 10, 2009 10:24 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Honest questions:
You don’t think Zorn is in over his head?
You think Zorn has all the offensive players playing to their potential?
I don’t.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 10:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Answers
Is Zorn in over his head?
I’m going to pass on that until we give him a proper group offensive players to work with.
Offensive players playing to their potential?
Offensive players will never reach their potential until the team properly addresses the offensive line. It’s nearly impossible to evaluate skill position players when the offensive line constantly collapses. Yes, unfortunately the offensive line is playing to their potential, which was quite low to begin with.
by Kurtstack on Nov 10, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But Zorn makes mistakes that have nothing to with bad starting offensive tackles
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Every head coach does
Yes, he’s made some mistakes, I don’t expect him to be a magic man though. I can’t see any coach in the NFL at this point who would be able to get us more than 17 points a game with our offensive line.
by Kurtstack on Nov 10, 2009 1:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In my opinion
scoring 17 points isn’t the threshold I’m looking at
he’s still making mistakes and looking as inept as ever. I’ve seen no progress from him, and the only coaches who make the type and number of mistakes he does are coaches who should also be fired.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
- complete inability to manage the clock/timeouts
- moronic challenges
- stubborn resistance to wildcat & shotgun
- play calling, play calling, play calling:
repeatedly calling the same failed run plays, three times a row sometimes; the stretch play on his own goal line; repeatedly failing to install or run a 2-minute offense
- various choices about when to go for it on 4th, and when to kick FGs
do you want me to keep going?
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
remember the HB option pass in the red zone on third f-cking down (a passing down)?
that was great.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1, smutsboy1 is absolutely right
Zorn did a clusterfuc* of a job then and he will relentlessly continue to do so because as bad as our offensive line is, in the first 6 weeks where we faced the Rams, the Lions, the Buccaneers, the Panthers, and the Chiefs. We are not talking defensive stalwarts here. As I posted below, we do have some decent personnel. Our O-line is godawful compared to the average NFL team, but we faced nothing short of embarrassingly terrible defenses during these first 6+ weeks outside of the Giants. Decent personnel = Decent personnel relative to the caliber of teams we faced. The defenses of those teams (Rams/Lions/Bucs/Panthers/Chiefs) were abominations and despite a weak O-line relative to the average NFL team, Shaun Suisham should not have been our highest point-totaler & most potent offensive weapon in terms of results. Even with a poor O-line, facing equally if not more poor defenses during these 6 weeks, the scores we achieved against those teams are patently inexcusable.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But seriously
what mistakes? LOL
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
seriously, this obsession with keepin on Zorn as a way of saying "suck it Snyder/Cerrato"
you will learn patience!!!" [with.. developing… a clearly unqualified & overmatched former QBs coach who hadn’t even been an offensive coordinator once in the pros.. in the NFC East???] is stupefying. Those idiots do need to instill in themselves & their directorship of the franchise in the most desperate sense of urgency, but the patience we need is in taking the draft and player-development more seriously as well as ridding our scouting department and coaches of the rickety yes-men who keep enabling & validating Snyder & Cerrato/keep them thinking that they are continuously making sound decisions.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
like Greg Blache & others like him who think the ride is going as best as it possibly can. Literally, the only defense of Zorn I’ve heard in all the words that have been wasted on his (as well as Snyder & Cerrato’s) equally horrendous, unprepared & uninspired performance as a head coach for this team, is that “no head coach is perfect” and “at least he is accountable to us .. unlike the hated Snyder & Cerrato..”
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I could have been clearer about my stance on Zorn
He has made unacceptable mistakes at various points in the last two seasons. But when you bring somebody in with zero experience, that is what you get. Firing him now just reeks of quitting on a guy with potential. And we can’t afford to quit on potential right now. We are not one player away from a Super Bowl. We are not one coach away from a Super Bowl. Until we are either of those things, we can’t just be jettisoning guys over the side of this ship.
On top of that, firing Zorn is way to close to being a reason to retain Cerrato. And that would be the biggest mistake of all. If we fire Cerrato this year and keep Zorn, I’ll grant you that Zorn probably only has a 50/50 chance (at best) to get a new contract with the new de facto GM. But at least the guy would have a fighting chance. In the situation we find ourselves in, we need guys who want to fight for their jobs and future opportunities. That includes Zorn.
by Ken Meringolo on Nov 10, 2009 11:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
You haven't outlined how Zorn is going to dramatically become a better coach
he’s in over his head. seems pretty obvious too me. and that’s not something that just fixes itself eventually. if you don’t have a mentor or veteran coach, where is this knowledge going to come from?
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with your response.
I’ll take it back to what I said earlier. If you bring in a new GM, you are basically giving him the keys (which is what I believe we should do). When you do that, you don’t tell him who to keep, hire or sign. You let him do his job. If he keeps Zorn, thats fine. But I just don’t see that happening. The examples of a new GM coming in and keeping the old coach is pretty few and far between and I can’t remember it ever remember it ending well (remember Schottenheimer in SD).
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If we all agree that the insides of this franchise are totally f'ed
then I don’t think we can properly grade Zorn as a failure of a head coach at this point. I would be more than willing to let a new GM make the call on Zorn.
I also think that if you let Zorn coach out his contract and let the new GM decide not to renew him, it goes a long way towards showing good candidates that this franchise is operating under a brand new set of rules.
To clarify another point…I am not advocating forcing Zorn on a new GM. But I think we need to take the long view on this one. Let a new personnel guy come in and dig into what this team has then decide what it needs. Zorn’s contract is up after next year. Perfect chance to say, thanks but no thanks. This thing is not going to get fixed in one year. In fact, the best fix we can hope for is only going to occur over a multiple-season stretch. I just don’t feel the urgency to fire Zorn. But if the new GM wants to, so be it.
by Ken Meringolo on Nov 10, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree...kind of
I’ll take it back to what I said earlier. If you bring in a new GM, you are basically giving him the keys (which is what I believe we should do). When you do that, you don’t tell him who to keep, hire or sign. You let him do his job. If he keeps Zorn, thats fine. But I just don’t see that happening. The examples of a new GM coming in and keeping the old coach is pretty few and far between and I can’t remember it ever remember it ending well (remember Schottenheimer in SD).
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I recognize the point but strongly disagree
I don’t think we can properly grade Zorn as a failure of a head coach at this point.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Its absolutely high-larious how there is a split on this post. There’s the people with foresight, testicular fotitude and tact (you know the people you would want in battle with you) and then there are the needle dick types that are likely slaves to their wives s&m fetishes that show no ability for patience or endurance as it pertains to pain management. Not one of them is in any postition to say Zorn is in over his head. I agree with Sugar that the GM is first and if Zorn stays fine. But freaking out and throwing the blade down is not what we need to do. I wish patience was a forced character trait amongst humans punishable by repeatedly broken legs. (Damn you Bill of Rights!) Givem the ol’ Wheelchair Treatment for a few weeks. See how patient you all are then.
by TheOverLordMarshl on Nov 10, 2009 12:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What do you have against
S & M fetishes?
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He has....
3 nipples…..try to find nipple clamps with 3 clamps…..impossible!
by shvd98z24 on Nov 10, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The other point
is that there aren’t a lot people blaming Zorn. But we have all identified the front office as the problem. If that is true, then it needs to change (by no means a snap decision). If that is the case, then you have to hire the right GM and back off. The key is to put a football mind in a position to lead the team. After that, you let him decide on Zorn. I’m just saying that if is very unlikely that Zorn stays in this scenario.
I also disagree that the people who are okay with this are the pansies. Saying that they are needle dicks is pretty misguided. Quite frankly, if these things all came true, it would show the most fortitude to bring in a person who could lead this team and have the owner back off.
You’re basically like a battered wife. She doesn’t know any better so she stays with the guy who keeps beating her. Is that fortitude? I would argue it takes more fortitude to correct her situation and move on.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Coaches often take the heat
For deeper problems in an organization. That is exactly what is happening here with Zorn.
by Kurtstack on Nov 10, 2009 1:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The problem is and always has been...
The GM! Our GM fields a team suited for a pro-style offensive attack: Portis, Sellers, Cooley, Fred Davis, Yoder, Campbell and an immobile offensive line…. THEN he hires a coach to run a West Coast Offense!!!! Look no further than Philly to find the personnel needed to run the West Coast offense properly.
by Kurtstack on Nov 10, 2009 1:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yes, fire Vinny, and let the new GM choose the head coach. I would hope that Zorn gets another year, though.
Good offensive linemen make coaches look like geniuses. There is no way to evaluate Zorn or JC right now. There has never been a QB in the history of the game so good that he could win behind this O-line.
by hsoup on Nov 10, 2009 1:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I do agree
that everything is skewed because of the dysfuctionality of our O-line these past few years. However, I still have no faith in Zorn. He just looks constantly lost everytime they show him. As for Campbell, I no longer get into that debate. It’s a moot point. Nobody in their right mind can seriously think that there is any chance that Snyder will resign him. Therefor, there’s no reason for debating. Campbell, is gone, and Zorn will be too.
Now, I DO agree that no “big name” coach is gonna want to come here. I think we have to get lucky. And yes, I AM holding out hope that we will. Sunshine – dog’s ass – all that stuff. I think if we could convince someone (legitimate) to come in as GM and, maybe hire big Russ FINALLY, we may have a chance at building something DESPITE having such a joke for an owner.
by CJHutch on Nov 10, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Send this to Vinny
The West Coast offense requires a quarterback who throws extremely accurately, and often blindly, very close to opposing players. In addition, it requires the quarterback to be able to quickly pick one of 5 receivers to throw to — much more quickly than previously used systems. Often, the quarterback cannot think about the play, but instead reacts instinctively — and thus is often under the control of the offensive coordinator, calling the plays for him.
This is in contrast to the previous quarterback requirements of other systems, which were an adept game manager and a strong arm. Thus, for example, many people reasoned that Johnny Unitas, a strong-armed field general would not have fared well in being subservient to the offensive coordinator, and that his long but sometimes wobbly passes would not have worked in the new system. The West Coast offense caused a split still evident today among quarterbacks: those who were more adept at the West Coast style (Joe Montana, Steve Young, Brett Favre, Matt Hasselbeck) and those more in tune with the old style (Dan Marino, Jim Kelly). Rich Gannon is a good example of a quarterback who fared better in one system than the other. Gannon struggled in the old style system but found great success with the Oakland Raiders and the West Coast system run by head coach Jon Gruden.
Also, the West Coast offense requires sure-handed receivers comfortable catching in heavy traffic, and the system downplays speedy, larger receivers who are covered easily in short yardage situation. One result has been the longevity of receivers in the West Coast system (such as the notable Jerry Rice) because a decline in speed is not as harmful, when, in “stretch the field” systems, a receiver who loses a step is a major liability. “WCO” systems also rely on agile running backs that catch the ball as often as they run. Roger Craig was a leading receiver for the 49ers for many years and was a 1,000 yard rusher and 1,000 yard receiver in the 1985 season. Finally, receivers must follow precise, complicated routes as opposed to innovation; so subservient, intelligent players are valued more than independent, pure athletes.
Finally, the West Coast offense, with its emphasis on quick reactive skills, can be seen to further develop the running quarterback motif, where extremely fast running quarterbacks (Randall Cunningham, Michael Vick, and Vince Young) and other notable scrambling quarterbacks (Jake Plummer and Donovan McNabb) are valued, if they are good passers, because in blitz or short-yardage situations, when the West Coast offense’s value is negated, the running quarterback can make up this difference by posing a threat to make the first down himself, paralyzing an aggressive defense.
by Kurtstack on Nov 10, 2009 1:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
excellent post
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 10, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This comment reminds me of Frank the Tank in Old School
Partly because I know Kurt, and partly because this comment is so great.
by Ken Meringolo on Nov 10, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow...+25
I knew all that, but not in 4 concisely worded paragraphs! Do you possess the “Football Encyclopedia” gene?
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 3:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wiki
Is great. I can’t take credit for this. I just thought that it might help Cerrratto when selecting personnel.
by Kurtstack on Nov 11, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You presume
he can read.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 12, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt
that our #1 PROBLEM is our lack of a bona fide GM. I don’t care who the coach is. If you don’t have the RIGHT talent, the coach is meaningless. And by RIGHT talent, I mean a team that meshes, or has chemistry. We started to see some chemistry with Gibbs, but Snyder chucked that out the window after the Gregg Williams debacle. Not only does this team not have chemistry, I’m not sure they even like each other. That Deangelo Hall incident proves it once and for all as far as I’m concerned. Like Lavar said on his show, “fine be damned, if my guy is getting roughed up on the other teams sideline, I’m going over there to hit someone.” Unfortunately, Big Al was the only one who had this mentality. Funny, isn’t it, that the 2 “new guys” on the team are the only ones fighting? Says a lot to me.
Now, to tie the fight into Sugar’s Zorn discussion, I think this incident also proved that Zorn is not the right coach for this team. On one side, you have Mike Smith, breaking the rules to stick up for his players. On the other side, you have Zorn, admittedly, keeping his team from going over there to help Hall. Now I KNOW that “fighting is not the answer”, and that it’s frowned upon, and that the HC can NOT condone the behavior. All that is fine. Makes for something to debate AFTER the melee. However, in the meantime, your team is getting embarrassed, your QB is getting beaten worse than Apollo Creed against Drago, and now your starting CB is getting passed around on the opposing teams sideline like a drunk floozie. So, tell me, exactly WHEN does your MANHOOD kick in? Like I said – a telling sign. Starting with the coach.
Also, another reason I am even MORE disappointed in Zorn than I have been all season is Jason Campbells testament that Zorn “raised his voice and yelled” at the guys at halftime. Nope, I’m not upset about that. What upsets me is that Campbell said this is the first time he’s “really heard Coach raise his voice.” REALLY? We’re 4-12 over the last 16 games, and you’re JUST NOW raising your voice at these underachieving, soft-hearted, bunch of ninnies? What does he think he’s gonna bruise their egos? HAH!! These guys NEED their egos bruised. They STILL think they’re good. WTF?? Do you really think any REAL head coach worth his weight, with an ounce of pride, would let this crap continue? I don’t. So, no, I don’t think Zorn is “the Answer.” Not unless the question is who’s the most clueless farce of a coach in the league right now?
by CJHutch on Nov 10, 2009 2:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Is this really the topic of the day ?
The Rod has spoken
by Rodskin on Nov 10, 2009 2:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sugar before i say anything, and I promise this is completely unrelated to my opinions, yours, and any clash in re, i think the titles of these posts are kind of creepy. “Pour some Sugar on Me”? It just strikes me as really, really creepy. Anyway, I will cut to the chase. Keeping Zorn? That is patently the worst suggestion I have read so far since I began reading this blog. And I feel compelled to rebut your argument to keep Zorn because I think it sits on an irrational foundation, and is wrong factually.
1) “It is not Jim Zorn’s fault that Dan Snyder hired a guy who may have been a little raw to be the head coach here. In fact, the one thing everyone knew was that Jim Zorn was raw. If Dan Snyder saw something in Jim Zorn that made him think Zorn could be a future successful head coach, then he simply has to be patient. You can’t be right about something like that immediately every time.”
…
My response: Just because you disclaim the fact that Zorn was a “raw” head coach coming in to the organization repeatedly does not mean that he has some hidden potential that’s going to be unearthed if we just wait for him to finish learning on the job. I think it’s idiotic to talk about the NFC East like it’s Triple-A & our head coach is analogous to grooming a raw minor-league baseball player. If you even attempt to name a head coach in the NFC East who has been a success by “grooming”, we’d wait all day until the end of our lives, because there has never been one for a very good reason: You simply don’t “groom” head coaches, because while they’re busy sucking for years or demonstrating for a protracted time that they aren’t going to pan out, your franchise tanks, your players lose faith and don’t give play inspired & the organization swiftly becomes a notoriously unattractive place for players to go. I’ll break it down for you and anyone else who thinks this awful idea is a good one. First, the level of competition is simply far too intense and destructive for any coach to “learn on the job”, facing Andy Reid’s Eagles, Jerry Jones’s talented teams (as much as it disgusts me to admit it), and the Giants under Coughlin. I think you’re confusedly substituting the patience Snyder & Cerrato should have for player development for some bizarre theory of “coach development”. Your intense disgust is predictable and shared by I’m guessing 99% of us here, but there is no room to “develop” a head coach in the NFC East no matter how hard you want to tell Snyder & Cerrato to shove it and just not treat the players like they are playing fantasy football. And no number of disclaimers mitigates the absolutely horrendous shi*job that Zorn has done this year.
2) “We have come to know since he was hired that Jim Zorn is a man of character and integrity. If Snyder learned anything from Joe Gibbs, it is that character and integrity are the most important things to build a team around. It is what a man does when things aren’t going his way that you learn the most about him. To put it mildly, things aren’t going his way these days. Zorn is not running from the challenge. Do any of us honestly blame Zorn for the offensive line problems? Cerrato rolled the dice big time and it cost Zorn any chance to get his offense going. Finally, we have fired coach after coach after coach. At some point it is not the coach (although at multiple points in our past…it was the coach…hehehe.)”
…
My response: First, this reads initially like you are campaigning for the man, and given that most of us live in a city with the most politicians per-capita, I’d like to cut through the b.s. of advertising the desirability of keeping Zorn on such a mentally-obtuse basis such as “he has character and integrity. Therefore we should keep him on… essentially because, he’s nice and answers to us unlike the owner and his toadie assistant [Cerrato].” Of course Zorn is not ‘running’ from the problem, and this is why: The man is being paid a very handsome sum and if he resigns now, it would be incredibly difficult for him to get any decent job, including even what he was before, a lowly quarterbacks coach. Notwithstanding how yes, he has been treated like dirty by Snyder/Cerrato, he has also called a horrendous game and even with decent personnel shat the bed offensively. Even taking into account our pathetic offensive line, given the record-setting poor defenses we faced for the first 6 weeks aside from the Giants we have the personnel to put up more competitive scores than 9-7, 6-14, and and 14-19 to a team that had not won a game in over a year (and most sports people in the media had sounded the alarm of caution about pre-game).
Yes he has been treated like dirt, but let’s not treat Zorn like he’s sliced bread simply because we assume it’s simply another way of contrasting & contravening the confusing and shitty job Snyder & Cerrato have done. Zorn sucks too. He’s just nicer and more direct, that is all. There is no way he can parlay his godawful game-calling and timeout management into an offensive coordinator’s post after this, so of course he will stay, nobody would want to forfeit that money and (even though he’s been stripped of his authority here) step down two rungs of the ladder into a quarterbacks coach gig for an even shittier team. And simply because he’s nicer than that as*hole Spurrier doesn’t mean he’s a better coach. He’s nicer. But he still sucks something awful, isn’t a tremendously special ‘stand-up’ guy if you analyze his professional situation from afar, and deserves to be fired more than any other coach in the NFC.
My point being, we do have some decent personnel. Our O-line is godawful compared to the average NFL team, but we faced nothing short of embarrassingly terrible defenses during these first 6+ weeks outside of the Giants. Decent personnel = Decent personnel relative to the caliber of teams we faced. Their defenses were abominations and despite a weak O-line relative to the average NFL team, Shaun Suisham should not have been our highest point-totaler & most potent offensive weapon in terms of results. Even with a poor O-line, facing equally if not more poor defenses during these 6 weeks, the scores we achieved against those teams are patently inexcusable.
I find that our disgust for Snyder & Cerrato (which is completely founded) has become so irrepressive that almost any time the few of us who point out that Zorn in his capacity as coach has done as horrible a job as is possible with the unquestionably bad team Snyder & Cerrato have impetuously assembled like children with a combination of fantasy players and erector-sets, many persons’ reflex is to mitigate Zorn’s equally humiliating shortcomings because he is the polar opposite of what Snyder & Cerrato are to all of us – he has to speak to us post-game in conference & has to face public scrutiny face-to-face rather than through the tinted space of the luxury box. My point is that as godawful a mishmash of free agents and bad picks Snyder & Cerrato have put together, Zorn has done about as horrible as a coach & offensive coordinator could do with the personnel we have against these winless, hapless defenses.
Also, I disagree with "let’s just sit back and let Zorn ‘grow’/he’s a rookie coach & things like that just happen." If that implies that we have to go through rookie motions & mistakes with a coach of all people then I disagree, because we don’t pay & hire head coaches to learn on the job. Zorn has demonstrated a clear ability to commit horrible time-out mistakes single-handedly, which again is inexcusable. With any other team, Zorn wouldn’t make it, simply a glance at his resume is a pretty stark indice that the man was never meant to make this jump, and judging from his results as o-coordinator of the Redskins, he will be extremely lucky to segue his terrible performance here even to a quarterbacks coach of a good organization, i don’t think there is any question he will not become an offensive coordinator anywhere for a long, long time. Let’s just move past all of this "I like Zorn because it’s another way of saying FU Snyder/Cerrato and think with our heads & not with our hearts towards this admittedly nice guy who is so expressly not cut out to be an NFC East head coach and we need to free ourselves of as we start with a bona fide, qualified individual at the helm.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 2:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yes i know, "omg you wrote so much dude!"
but I think the argument in re: keeping Zorn is as good an idea as keeping on Matt Millen to see if he “pans out”. It’s irrational and factually repulsive.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
sorry i posted twice, you can answer to the 2nd one below
if there exists a rebuttal for a defense of Jim Zorn. My computer messed up and didn’t show that these first two mesages had posted, apologies.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Keeping Zorn On = the Worst Idea Ever
Sugar before i say anything, and I promise this is completely unrelated to my opinions, yours, and any clash in re, i think the titles of these posts are kind of creepy. "Pour some Sugar on Me"? It just strikes me as really, really creepy. Anyway, I will cut to the chase. Keeping Zorn? That is patently the worst suggestion I have read so far since I began reading this blog. And I feel compelled to rebut your argument to keep Zorn because I think it sits on an irrational foundation, and is wrong factually.
1) "It is not Jim Zorn’s fault that Dan Snyder hired a guy who may have been a little raw to be the head coach here. In fact, the one thing everyone knew was that Jim Zorn was raw. If Dan Snyder saw something in Jim Zorn that made him think Zorn could be a future successful head coach, then he simply has to be patient. You can’t be right about something like that immediately every time."
…
My response: Just because you disclaim the fact that Zorn was a "raw" head coach coming in to the organization repeatedly does not mean that he has some hidden potential that’s going to be unearthed if we just wait for him to finish learning on the job. I think it’s idiotic to talk about the NFC East like it’s Triple-A & our head coach is analogous to grooming a raw minor-league baseball player. If you even attempt to name a head coach in the NFC East who has been a success by "grooming", we’d wait all day until the end of our lives, because there has never been one for a very good reason: You simply don’t "groom" head coaches, because while they’re busy sucking for years or demonstrating for a protracted time that they aren’t going to pan out, your franchise tanks, your players lose faith and don’t give play inspired & the organization swiftly becomes a notoriously unattractive place for players to go. I’ll break it down for you and anyone else who thinks this awful idea is a good one. First, the level of competition is simply far too intense and destructive for any coach to "learn on the job", facing Andy Reid’s Eagles, Jerry Jones’s talented teams (as much as it disgusts me to admit it), and the Giants under Coughlin. I think you’re confusedly substituting the patience Snyder & Cerrato should have for player development for some bizarre theory of "coach development". Your intense disgust is predictable and shared by I’m guessing 99% of us here, but there is no room to "develop" a head coach in the NFC East no matter how hard you want to tell Snyder & Cerrato to shove it and just not treat the players like they are playing fantasy football. And no number of disclaimers mitigates the absolutely horrendous shi*job that Zorn has done this year.
2) "We have come to know since he was hired that Jim Zorn is a man of character and integrity. If Snyder learned anything from Joe Gibbs, it is that character and integrity are the most important things to build a team around. It is what a man does when things aren’t going his way that you learn the most about him. To put it mildly, things aren’t going his way these days. Zorn is not running from the challenge. Do any of us honestly blame Zorn for the offensive line problems? Cerrato rolled the dice big time and it cost Zorn any chance to get his offense going. Finally, we have fired coach after coach after coach. At some point it is not the coach (although at multiple points in our past…it was the coach…hehehe.)"
…
My response: First, this reads initially like you are campaigning for the man, and given that most of us live in a city with the most politicians per-capita, I’d like to cut through the b.s. of advertising the desirability of keeping Zorn on such a mentally-obtuse basis such as "he has character and integrity. Therefore we should keep him on… essentially because, he’s nice and answers to us unlike the owner and his toadie assistant [Cerrato]." Of course Zorn is not ‘running’ from the problem, and this is why: The man is being paid a very handsome sum and if he resigns now, it would be incredibly difficult for him to get any decent job, including even what he was before, a lowly quarterbacks coach. Notwithstanding how yes, he has been treated like dirty by Snyder/Cerrato, he has also called a horrendous game and even with decent personnel shat the bed offensively. Even taking into account our pathetic offensive line, given the record-setting poor defenses we faced for the first 6 weeks aside from the Giants we have the personnel to put up more competitive scores than 9-7, 6-14, and and 14-19 to a team that had not won a game in over a year (and most sports people in the media had sounded the alarm of caution about pre-game).
Yes he has been treated like dirt, but let’s not treat Zorn like he’s sliced bread simply because we assume it’s simply another way of contrasting & contravening the confusing and shitty job Snyder & Cerrato have done. Zorn sucks too. He’s just nicer and more direct, that is all. There is no way he can parlay his godawful game-calling and timeout management into an offensive coordinator’s post after this, so of course he will stay, nobody would want to forfeit that money and (even though he’s been stripped of his authority here) step down two rungs of the ladder into a quarterbacks coach gig for an even shittier team. And simply because he’s nicer than that as*hole Spurrier doesn’t mean he’s a better coach. He’s nicer. But he still sucks something awful, isn’t a tremendously special ‘stand-up’ guy if you analyze his professional situation from afar, and deserves to be fired more than any other coach in the NFC.
My point being, we do have some decent personnel. Our O-line is godawful compared to the average NFL team, but we faced nothing short of embarrassingly terrible defenses during these first 6+ weeks outside of the Giants. Decent personnel = Decent personnel relative to the caliber of teams we faced. Their defenses were abominations and despite a weak O-line relative to the average NFL team, Shaun Suisham should not have been our highest point-totaler & most potent offensive weapon in terms of results. Even with a poor O-line, facing equally if not more poor defenses during these 6 weeks, the scores we achieved against those teams are patently inexcusable.
I find that our disgust for Snyder & Cerrato (which is completely founded) has become so irrepressive that almost any time the few of us who point out that Zorn in his capacity as coach has done as horrible a job as is possible with the unquestionably bad team Snyder & Cerrato have impetuously assembled like children with a combination of fantasy players and erector-sets, many persons’ reflex is to mitigate Zorn’s equally humiliating shortcomings because he is the polar opposite of what Snyder & Cerrato are to all of us – he has to speak to us post-game in conference & has to face public scrutiny face-to-face rather than through the tinted space of the luxury box. My point is that as godawful a mishmash of free agents and bad picks Snyder & Cerrato have put together, Zorn has done about as horrible as a coach & offensive coordinator could do with the personnel we have against these winless, hapless defenses.
Also, I disagree with “let’s just sit back and let Zorn ‘grow’/he’s a rookie coach & things like that just happen.” If that implies that we have to go through rookie motions & mistakes with a coach of all people then I disagree, because we don’t pay & hire head coaches to learn on the job. Zorn has demonstrated a clear ability to commit horrible time-out mistakes single-handedly, which again is inexcusable. With any other team, Zorn wouldn’t make it, simply a glance at his resume is a pretty stark indice that the man was never meant to make this jump, and judging from his results as o-coordinator of the Redskins, he will be extremely lucky to segue his terrible performance here even to a quarterbacks coach of a good organization, i don’t think there is any question he will not become an offensive coordinator anywhere for a long, long time. Let’s just move past all of this "I like Zorn because it’s another way of saying FU Snyder/Cerrato and think with our heads & not with our hearts towards this admittedly nice guy who is so expressly not cut out to be an NFC East head coach and we need to free ourselves of as we start with a bona fide, qualified individual at the helm.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I understand your position
If could expand on that explanation, that may help.
by monk81 on Nov 10, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Especially
points 17 thru 43. They appear a bit sketchy.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 3:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"factually repulsive"
great term. hehehe
I read your comment…twice….each…
So I can put you down as a “No” for the Jim Zorn rally? Listen, your points are well-taken. I am not voting for Zorn as Coach of the Year. I am not even calling him a great coach. I don’t think arguing for Zorn is as indefensible as you seem to believe. I don’t think he is as bad a coach as you paint him up to be in your diatribe there. Perhaps he isn’t as stand-up as I believe him to be either. Also, I would never base an endorsement of a coach solely on an “F U” attitude towards Snyder or Vinny.
As for the title of the post…nothing creepy there son. Only your own warped mind can derive creepiness from a Def Leppard song title that features my nickname.
by Sugar on Nov 10, 2009 3:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry I just think I’m not old enough to have been of age to appreciate Def Leppard. Tell the 80s and Ronald Reagan hi for me big guy.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
let's try that again
You can’t convince me you have never heard of Def Leppard.
by Sugar on Nov 10, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
our little tit-for-tat aside, i have heard of def leppard but haven’t listened to them, and don’t know anyone who does.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
except for older guys who wear jorts
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but just to be clear, my arg wasn’t that Zorn should be canned mid-season. I take serious issue with a lack of factual accountability in all of the Zorn man-crushing this tiny but vocal portion of folks have because literally all i hear is “man, what a classy guy who pays attention to us/is accountable post-game” followed by "Snyder & Cerrato need to learn patience, let’s force-feed it to them indiscriminately without care whether we need patience in all facets of the game (coaching AND scouting/player dev./the draft… bad idea because historically there are zero examples of good “groomed” head coaches in the NFC East and no sane person would advocate that position for the future). I can’t stick around but apologies for any rudeness, and I do know we’re all on the same team, even if not on the same page, I’d just like to see a real basis for this Zorn man-crushing aside from what you’ve presented.
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Did You Know?
Tanyon Sturtze came out of the bullpen for the Yankees to the song “Pour Some Sugar On Me”?
by Sugar on Nov 10, 2009 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
when Zorn lost me
Detroit
the first series we go down the field and instead of taking the 3 points after not being able to punch it in, reacts clearly to the media during the prior week (remember when we criticised ugly wins, oh they were the days) and goes for the TD adn doesnt get it.
next series we stop Detroit on 3rd down near the 35 yard line but there is a flag on the play and Zorn takes the penalty, Lions then convert 3rd and 15 and get a TD.
BUT THIS IS WHERE HE LOST ME
In the post match press conference he explains the reason to try and punch it in thusly “I just didnt think the 3 points were going to be that important in the game”
but then explaining the taking of the penalty, he says "their kicker has made kicks from 51 this year and I wanted to push him back on the field goal attempt
INTELLECUTAL DISHONESTY STUPIDITY OR WHAT I STILL DONT KNOW
So what Zorn is saying is that in the space of one drive 3 points went from not being that importnat to so important that we better push back a 50/50 field goal try even at the risk of them converting and us losing 7, instead of just being truthful (I thought integrity was what set him apart) and just saying simply, “I caved under the media pressure from the week and could not handle seeing another red zone failure”
Them two decisions cost us 10 points in the 1st quarter (7 if the guy had made the field goal) in a game we lost by 4
Look I like the guy, but he has to go
Pommylee
by Pommylee on Nov 10, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It just goes to show
That there is literally no foundation for justifying keeping Jim Zorn on as head coach, aside from the following arguments:
1) He’s nice (insert vague synonyms such as ‘character guy’). Let’s keep him!
2) Snyder & Cerrato need to learn to be patient. Let’s be stupid and not discriminate b/w patience in re player development, a serious approach to the draft & a tremendous investment in the scouting dept, and instead treat the issue these clowns have with patience like we should be patient with everything. Including head coaches.
3) At least he is accountable. Unlike Snyder & Cerrato, whom we hate more than anyone. Therefore let’s keep him on because at least he pays attention to us!
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I understand your points
Where is SSBlitz? He is our resident “snarky” comment alert guy.
You are also missing the point that we all are ready to have the new GM make the call on Zorn.
by Sugar on Nov 10, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree in re the new GM & that it’s his call, but I just think there’s a serious lack of factual accountability per Zorn’s performance that is conspicuously absent in all of the ‘I heart Zorn because he’s a nice guy’, such as the fact that against the Lions, Rams, Panthers, and Chiefs, their defenses were at LEAST as horrid as our offensive line, if not worse, and we definitely had more offensive threats than they had defensive weapons. And still this guy has an indice of hidden potential waiting to emerge if we just ‘have patience’?
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There is one really good reason to keep him
at least another year aside from the hope of some stability – if we ever seriously start looking for a coach we have to show the league that the franchise can be operated with some class. Just ditching a guy like Zorn – whom you put in this position – just stinks. And we need the stability or the fortitude to blow the whole damn thing up.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 3:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree with the contention that we shouldn’t just kick him to the curb like yesterday’s news, but i don’t think that was ever my arg. I just took issue with this stupefying defense of keeping on Zorn past this season
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Nov 10, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
stupefying defense
Nice.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 10, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought you wanted to get rid of Zorn because of the stupefying OFFENSE, not stupefying DEFENSE
’cuz that would be Greg Blache
by BillWard on Nov 10, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a quote to remember
Paraphrased slightly:
“When I first got here, I looked around, and realized that I needed to fire either the headcoach or the GM, it just wasn’t working, we weren’t on the road to success. I made it known someone was going to lose their job. We ended up 10-7, with a loss in the playoffs, so I went out and fired the GM. In retrospect, I made a mistake.”
I have a VERY bad feeling we’re about to see someone over compensate for that mistake.
Considering just how far away we are from being a good team now, I have to say… ok. Fire Vinnie, and bring in a real GM. Tell him that you’re willing to give him a FULL four years, guarenteed, no fire, etc., but that you’re willing to allow him if he wants to keep Campbell and Zorn while he finds who he really wants long term. The only requirement that you impose is that he build a team to be sustainable and entertaining; every player is tradeable, if they can work it properly and get fair value; no sacred elephants, but that you’ll open the wallet for whatever it needs to be, coach, player, trainer, or draft pick.
If Dan does that, we’ll have a winner in a couple years. If he doesn’t we’ll have a winner here in a couple decades.
by BillWard on Nov 10, 2009 4:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Broncos Fan Here
I look forward to a good game at Landover this Sunday and I hope the Broncos come out with a big win to get things back on track. I expect the ‘Skins’ best shot, but we’ll see what happens. We have to turn things around and Orton has to be the quarterback he was early in the season. We’ll see you guys Sunday. GO BRONCOS!!!
Brad James
by the Bradfather on Nov 10, 2009 5:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
tough one...
Broncos on a short week and having to fly cross-country…that should help SOME…but it’s your game to lose. I really think the Skins could win this, but they have to stop committing dumb penalties.
by KevinE on Nov 10, 2009 10:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i dont think the broncos are all
they are hyped up to be but i’m sure they will eek out a win this week…
by ACo on Nov 10, 2009 10:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Zorn's "potential"?
Not to pile on Zorn, but I don’t really get the argument that this guy has some sort of scary talent or great potential that we will be missing out on if we fire him.
Look at it this way, assuming Zorn is fired, do you imagine any of the other 31 teams in the NFL fighting to grab Zorn and his great “potential”? Of course not.
The rest of the NFL sees what we all see, a questionable coach of a terrible team. Just because we have a crappy owner, GM, and talent level, does not mean that Zorn would be a success with a good owner, GM, and players. He’d probably just be a questionable coach of a talented team.
Once he’s canned from here, Zorn will never be heard from again. He’ll likely be a bit player on the staff of some mediocre team.
by Mex_17 on Nov 10, 2009 7:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+2
Not to pile on Zorn, but I don’t really get the argument that this guy has some sort of scary talent or great potential that we will be missing out on if we fire him.
agree
Once he’s canned from here, Zorn will never be heard from again. He’ll likely be a bit player on the staff of some mediocre team.
agree
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 11, 2009 9:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why
he has not resigned despite the double castration efforts by Danny and Vinny in their quest to Kiffin him. He’ll be set for life just showing up and getting his paycheck – not that he isn’t trying hard to turn things around.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 12, 2009 11:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only reason
Zorn is still here right now is because Snyder doesn’t/didn’t have any better options. With the PROVEN talent level at HC sitting there in this upcoming offseason, I don’t see how anyone can justify risking another lost season in the Zorn experiment. Keeping Zorn another year with the likes of Cowher, Shanahan, Holmgren, Gruden, etc. sitting there available (assuming any one of these would come here) is the fantasy football equivalent of starting Jamarcus Russell at QB for the rest of the season because you hope that he might have a breakout game or two, even though Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Tom Brady or Phillip Rivers are available in free agency.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvIX3S0f-2c&feature=player_embedded
by VA_Skin on Nov 12, 2009 11:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
it's all true.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 12, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He
Snyder doesn’t/didn’t have any better options
didn’t have any options once he hired Zorn without having addressed the HC need first. Of the HCs you mention, I only like Cowher. The others have questions and negatives that don’t give me confidence of success or long term stability.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Nov 12, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pl;us I really doubt
any big name HC would come here, that was the problem when we took Zorn when even Spagnuolo turned us down, and now hes in St Louis I mean F*** we are the F***ing Washington Redskins and we got ditched for the Rams, please, that is the biggest indictement on Snyder of any
If you are a big name HC with SB rings, why would you come and have your reputation trashed working with Vinny, basically any of those names will just refuse to work with Cerrato and Snyder wont ditch his buddy or give up his meddling ways, so no Cowher for Washington or Holmgren or even Gruden, although listeing to Gruden on MNF I really dont know if I rate him at all, he sounds like a moron
Pommylee
by Pommylee on Nov 12, 2009 5:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No one of their caliber was available
when Zorn was hired. The timing of Gibbs’ departure killed us. If he had just finished the last year of his contract, we could have transitioned right into another proven coach.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvIX3S0f-2c&feature=player_embedded
by VA_Skin on Nov 12, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
true
but that is sort of what I was (very inartfully) trying to say, that if the Spagnuolos of the world, who never being a HC before should be jumping at any opportunity that presents itself, are smart enough to see Snyder is a career killer and pass on the opportunity to Coach the Skins, what hope do we have that a Big Name who will have his pick of any of the positions available will risk his reputation in Sntderrato town
Pommylee
by Pommylee on Nov 13, 2009 2:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















