Snyder Should Create A Committee of Great Redskins. Less Talky, More Heary
I had an epiphany when thinking about how this team should get itself back. I was trying very hard to think of what actually needs to happen to turn this franchise around. We all know that it's not simply a player here and a player there. There are structural changes that need to take place. Unfortunately, this all begins with Snyder swallowing his pride.
This may be the toughest part of this process. I just don't see it happening any other way. Snyder has to get rid of Cerrato, which may be closer to happening than we think. I know that nobody has any faith that this will ever happen. In fact, this should have been fairly obvious a number of times. For starters, when Schottenheimer fired him, nobody showed any interest in him. Nobody! Not even the Raiders. Then there's the obvious fact that he's the only constant, besides Snyder, from all the miserable seasons the last 10 years. How could he be kept in this organization after the year we are having? This is a big part of what I think will begin the re-emergence of this franchise. We just have to hope that Snyder walks in one day and says "Holy hell. I can't get this done with the people I have and with the business model I have been using." I'm even fine with giving Cerrato a figurehead position as long it comes with no authority or presence anywhere near the team, facility or stadium.
Intermission 1: By the way, every time I write the word 'Cerrato", a red squiggly line appears beneath as if I have misspelled a word. I know that all I have to do is right-click and add the word to the dictionary. But I can't bring myself to do it. I am so hopeful that he gets fired that I can't even add him to my dictionary. It's as if the little red squiggly line is my own protest to Snyder that Cerrato is not even dictionary-worthy.
The second part is equally big. Get ready for this. Why not go out and form a committee of the great Redskins and get their opinion of what this franchise needs. I know this seems unorganized, but look at history. Gibbs used to value his veterans so much that he formed a group of them that let him keep up with what the needs of the team were on a week to week to basis. This isn't much different. Who would know better what the team needs than the guys who have been there and done that? I'm not saying these guys will be there forever, but don't you see a place for these guys for the next 1-2 years as they advise Snyder on the GM, and the direction of the franchise?
This needs to be an organized, paid consultant committee that advises Dan collectively to make the right personnel moves to get this team right. I know they won't have any final authority but you know that Snyder would value their opinions since he is such a fan. He could use them starting right now. They can be sequestered in a fancy resort somewhere in the Caribbean where they will deliberate on moves to be made, actions to take place, and personnel to be retained or not retained. This committee will be invaluable in getting this franchise back to where it belongs by guys who have bled for this team. These guys will have to pour out their hearts to get this right. From a fan perspective, who wouldn't be excited that a group of legends are helping shape this franchise? I would be on board with this and very excited if Snyder asked these guys for any advice. Hell, I'd be excited if Snyder asked anybody for advice.
Intermission 2: Is there anybody that thinks Snyder is consulting with Jerry Jones? The cynical bastard in me thinks Snyder is asking Jones for his advice and Jones is just sabotaging the whole thing. What a laugh he must be having at our expense!
My list of candidates:
Brian Mitchell - I know he is negative at times. I know he speaks with his heart more than his head. But this committee will need that honesty and heart to temper the intellect in that room. This committee needs a person who is going to stand up and pout and throw chairs when Snyder hears that Ochocinco is a free agent and we should drive a truckload of money over to his house.
Darrell Green - He is totally underused as a former veteran of this team. This guy is a true Redskin in every sense of the word. He has always had a ton of pride playing for the Redskins so he has to be among the former players that are very embarrassed by this organization. Darrell will take a very cerebral approach to who is brought in. He was always very smart. His athleticism was always front and center but his intelligence is what got him through 19 years of one of the toughest positions in the game.
Joe Theismann - So Kornheiser thinks Joe Theismann should be the head coach. I won't go that far, but he's a lot smarter than he gets credit for. He gets killed for being a loudmouth. I won't dispute that nobody likes hearing Theismann talk more than Theismann. But you can't tell me that he doesn't have the pride in this organization to get in a room with the rest of these guys and hammer out an idea of what Snyder should be looking for. His ideas would benefit this team and we would be better for it.
Joe Jacoby - I always have a special place in my heart for this guy. But this committee can't be without the one thing that was a staple for this organization in its success and the thing that has been mishandled for years. The offensive line has to be part of the process and that comes from having a member of the line on this committee. I can be talked into replacing Jacoby with any member of that line (Bostic, Lachey, May, Starks, Grimm, Mckensie, or even Brown and Simmons). But they must be represented.
Sonny Jurgensen - Lets face it. Jurgensen already has Snyder's attention. The real question is whether Sonny will be part of a group that has to render a collective recommendation and serve as a consultant. He needs to just give Dan a box of SJ9's (you cigar smokers know what I'm talking about) and tell him not to come back until the box is gone. By that time, the real work will be done.
Mark May - I know that May already has a job. But he has shown to have a great football mind and I think his opinion would be invaluable. His recent book (Mark May's Tales from the Washington Redskins) shows that he takes a lot of pride in being a Redskin and I have to believe that he wants to see this turned around.
Gary Clark - I just want to see what happens when Brian Mitchell and Gary Clark disagree. I think I would actually pay to watch that. It would also breed the best possible resolution for the Redskins organization. EVER!
Mike Nelms - My second favorite Redskin (behind Art Monk). He never fair caught on the field and he won't fair catch this issue. Catchy, right?
I thought about guys like Art Monk, but I don't think he is aggressive enough to tackle this issue. He would probably be better as an assistant coach than a consultant. I also thought about other guys like Schlereth, Williams, and Gibbs (probably tough to get right now). These guys have other jobs or other reasons to not come back.
This committee is for consultation only. This committee would tell Dan Snyder what it means to build the franchise up the right way and they would protect him from himself. They would tell him who to bring in and what kind of philosophy is acceptable. I would even go so far as to include them in the interview process and selection process. What potential GM wouldn't take this franchise seriously if they were sitting across the table from the likes of Brian Mitchell, Joe Theismann and other legendary Redskins? What GM wouldn't want to be part of a franchise that respects its alumni so much that they are willing to get involved and make sure the organization gets back to what it once was?
This is an outside-the-box idea but why wouldn't we be thinking outside-the-box right now? As a fan, I would respect the hell out of this. I would even listen to Snyder if he were standing next to these guys and had their support. I guess its either this or trade our next three first rounders for Culpepper.
1 recs |
83 comments
| Add comment
Comments
waaaaay too much of an offensive tilt there
ISo far you have a decent representation, but I would add a couple of guys from the defensive side of the ball lrom our eras like Charles Mann, Ken Houston or even Chris Hanburger
I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused....
by piratedan7 on Oct 22, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Need to add...
Gus Ferrotte and start each meeting by headbutting Snyder so he is in a reasonable state of mind – unconscious.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I see your point
I wasn’t necessarily aiming for a balanced team to play. I was just thinking aback to the guys who bleed burgundy and gold. I would agree that these guys would fit that description as well. But I don’t think this committee should be too large though. It can’t get too big that it would be counterproductive. It has to be small enough to be cohesive and inclusive enough to get a multitude of ideas.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 12:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Skins comittee??!!!
I love the ex Skins, but I think the team needs a real objective football man at the top. I love Sonny and think he is the greatest pure passer of all time, but I don’t think he is a great judge of talent. Neither is Sam. Sonny is too snuggly with Snyder which makes me cringe. Snyder won’t hire anyone who will tell him what they really think. Go Riggo!!
by ODU78 on Oct 22, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah Riggo came to mind
But do you really think he’s gonna be productive. I love Riggo and i still wear his jersey to this day. But i am trying to put together a list of guys who will attempt to come to an agreement and get the team going in the right direction. This is the same guy who at halftime of a game, said (hungover mind you), “F**k it. Give me the damn ball and get out of the way.”
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Riggo
burned his bridges with Snyder today.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
with what?
is there a link to what he did today?
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See Yahoo Shutdown Corner
Redskins organization has been taken over by a child.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why are Trung Candidate and Ki-Jana Carter not on this committee?
by pas493 on Oct 22, 2009 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah. Shar Pourdanesh is hurt.
If Dan Snyder cared about anything besides his ego he'd hire a good GM and take a back seat.
by smutsboy1 on Oct 22, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Heath Shuler...
So we know which QB not to draft next year. This just gave me a great idea, I’m going to start a website to promote Russ Grimm as our coach.
by KevinE on Oct 22, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m down for Russ Grimm or basically anyone else. But give me a reason why he would make a good coach/better coach than any of the proven commodities out there? Besides nostalgia.
The dude is getting his first shot at being a coordinator this year and he’s ranked next to last in the NFL. Whats Grimm’s scheme? What coordinators would he bring in? How would he do with Danny?
by pas493 on Oct 22, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good questions
The best reason I can think of for bringing in Russ is that he would probably make improving the OL his top priority.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvIX3S0f-2c&feature=player_embedded
by VA_Skin on Oct 25, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe
I should include Micheal Westbrook as the enforcer
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what if we setup up a Vinny Cerrato punching bag at our tailgate??
Any fans that want a crack can go for it…
by KevinE on Oct 22, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What if we
Setup Vinny Cerrato himself to be a punching bag?
by bigrm18 on Oct 22, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Different era
I found only one flaw in your committee idea. All those players you named were from a different era. Did we learn anything from Gibbs’ comeback? He was quite successful coaching in a different era, then came back and was not so successful. Many of the guys on that list are all from that same former era. We need to get some current players on the list also. Those older players were here when players stuck around on teams for years and didn’t cry every season to be traded. They didn’t play on 15 teams before joining our organization. We need to get some opinions of players experiencing today’s NFL. What would make them want to stay? What would make them want to perform? Even more, what worked for them on other teams??
by RFKate28 on Oct 22, 2009 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wait for it
The different era is what I am going for. Its the era where having pride in being a Redskins meant something. I am not looking for X’s and O’s from these guys. I am looking for a consensus on personnel and a big-picture approach to the team’s direction. Of all the things that Gibbs when he came back, he legitimized the franchise. I think you’re proving my point. While we didn’t win championships, he did settle down the ever-changing franchise. When he left, snyder went rogue again. Thats not Gibbs’s fault. I’m looing for an attitude and a mentality that these guys will bring. I don’t want figureheads but I want guys who will help shape the next hires for snyder
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gibbs was very successful
in his second hitch. He had the team completely built for Greg Williams to take over. The system was in place, the players (for the most part) were in place, the coaches were in place. The Redskins would have been a very competitive team in that future. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen as planned and we are stuck in this future.
by grandpa grouse on Oct 22, 2009 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree
Yes, you are correct that the older era is exactly what we want to know about. But we also need to know what’s going on now. Maybe what worked for them 20 years ago isn’t going to work now. There needs to be a joining of the times. There has to be a way to apply what worked back then to how things run now, but you have to have the perspective of ‘now’ to full understand how it will work. I also don’t want figureheads (even though every person you named to be on this panel is or was a figurehead). I want players from the trenches then and players from the trenches now to collaborate.
by RFKate28 on Oct 22, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
SB Rings...
and attitude bring lots of creds. The hiring decisions will be made by the knowledgeable GM we all know Dan is going to hire. He will be getting input from the committee and the coaches. There can be a current player committee to handle the locker room and that kind of thing Gibbs was doing with his vets. Only problem, I don’t trust many of our vets (CP for example) to come up with good recommendations. London Fletcher would have to be on it, though.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The committee is more sort term than that
I see them helping snyder establish a direction for the team. They will help answer the question “Who are the Washington Redskins and how do we intend to win games?” Then they will help with the GM search. That could even include being in the room for the interviews (as stated above). Then they pretty much come to games and be present and be supportive of the franchise. They convene when necessary but once they hire a GM (who has presumably won the job by laying his 1, 2, and 3 year plan on how he intends to build a consistently winning team) they pretty much watch it all unfold.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, that too!
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
These players were in the trenches
These players are exactly what we need. I agree that we need to put now in perspective. In fact, the whole thing is about “now”. There are no current Redskins who’s opinion I would want. The point of these former Redskins is to help consult on who will be brought in to build this team. Presumably, the new GM is where the “now” comes in. The new GM would be responsible for building the team with all the contemporary X’s and O’s. The old Redskins are there to make sure that the mentality of being a Redskins is brought back. The pride these guys have will the invaluable factor that I am looking for.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The committeee of old guys...
is actually one of the better (few) ideas that have been kicked around lately. We must try something given the state of things and we know Dan’s not selling the team, so….got something better? Cough it up.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was meant
to respond to REKKA and GeoFly below – who normally have pretty good posts.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're confused.
someone said earlier that this idea was too far-fetched, I was saying that it’s not more so than thinking that Dan will sell the team which has been floating around this site a lot more than I think is sane. Having a committee of tried and true ’skins is an interesting idea, certainly not something I think is stupid.
SpotieOtieDopalicious
by Rekka on Oct 22, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well thanks for the "normally" but
A bunch of ex-Redskin Hero’s isn’t exactly a realistic or even a practical way to proceed.
Why not go out and form a committee of the great Redskins and get their opinion of what this franchise needs. I know this seems unorganized, but look at history.
You’re right about unorganized too.
I think it would be far better to get a couple of highly regarded current experts (as opposed to ex-players) together. Pay them as consultants to find a. a new GM, b. a new coach, c. I don’t know cuz I’m not an expert but I’m sure there’s a c., to come on board and fix the mess at the end of this season or sooner.
For this to happen, Danny would have to outright admit he’s been wrong about the way he has gone about building a franchise and abdicate that responsibility completely.
There’s always hope, but good luck that happening.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Oct 22, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that snyder probably won't swallow his pride,
as mentioned above. Are you re-hashing what i wrote? i agree that its far-fetched as I mentioned above. That’s the point. Have an imagination.
This is just an idea. Its totally outside-the-box thinking. Its spit-balling ideas to see what sticks. Its no worse than whats going on currently. It’s unique for sure.
The idea itself is unorganized. That is what i was referring to. If this were to actually take place, it would not be unorganized. I’m guessing that a bit more planning would take place beyond reading my article. But the point is that some of these guys are considered experts by their peers. The other guys add the redskins pride that we are lacking. And the other point is that snyder would be somewhat respected again for stepping out of the way and getting a real GM in place. That’s the goal. We need someone who will build this team. And whatever method is used to get there, it has to start with snyder stepping away. And that’s the biggest hurdle.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's kinda like War
If the generals are making stupid decisions and aren’t winning the battles, they gotta be replaced by other competent generals. Not by old war hero’s.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Oct 22, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
with all do respect
its not war. Its a game.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and with all "due" respect
sorry you don’t get the analogy
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Oct 23, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fantasy Island
Must have been your favorite TV show. Get real!
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Oct 22, 2009 2:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it's about as real as everybody on this site think Danny's gonna sell the team
SpotieOtieDopalicious
by Rekka on Oct 22, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Decision making by committee
http://tinyurl.com/yk6u6be – Google search by topic. I doubt the Snyder would buy into the notion of decision making by committee. He has been around long enough to know the good football minds in the NFL. He simply does not want to give up control that the top notch football managers would require. It does not take a committee to select a GOOD football manager.
by Jefferson1935 on Oct 22, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It sure doesn't work when does it himself
Maybe a committee is exactly what he needs.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see it as...
one set of opinions on how to solve the organizational problems we have including character issues and the type of players we need depending on who the new HC is. They aren’t managing the organization, just showing what they know works.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and certainly "another set of eyes"
to save snyder from himself.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree it may not be reality,
but it’s no worse than what’s going on now. Snyder seems to respect Gibbs so why wouldn’t he respect a committee of guys who are true Redskins to their core. This is just an idea but it’s definitely the best idea so far!
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Vote Tommy Tupa's dad and Gary on the committee
by pas493 on Oct 22, 2009 3:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ali Haji Shiekj can be the K committee...
And plug his Audi dealership too…since the Redskins need to make a buck.
by KevinE on Oct 22, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Their already is a committee
its called SNYDERATTO and it consists of Dan, Vinny, a magic 8 ball, a tarot card reader, a round room, a wall with velcro and 8 little people with velcro clothing on.
by skinsymets on Oct 22, 2009 3:37 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Disagree
Too many cooks in the kitchen. Too many old guys wanting things to be just like they were when they won their SBs (or just like they always wanted things to be). Former players, as a rule, are no good for this kind of thing. Some exceptions to that, maybe, but not enough to make a former player committee.
"One-on-one? You can't." -Gilbert Arenas
JC Bandwagon all day!
by kseandoyle on Oct 22, 2009 3:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agian, they don't have final authority
They are there to make sure the right direction is established. i believe this to be universal through the years. The mentality of being a Redskin and having pride in it is something that is missing right now. If can combine snyder’s money and the right attitude to bring in the right guy to build this team, we can’t miss.
i do agree that all of these guys would have to go into knowing that they have to get along and get to a resolution. You may be right with the “too many cooks in the kitchen”, how about if we pare the numbers down?
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see it as...
one set of opinions on how to solve the organizational problems we have including character issues and the type of players we need depending on who the new HC is. They aren’t managing the organization, just showing what they know works.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's my problem
They don’t know what works. They were players. They know how to be players. The purpose of the front office is to take care of front office business so that players and coaches don’t have to worry about that kind of stuff. Players do NOT know how to build a team, how to hire the right coach, any of that. All they know is how to respond positively or negatively to the players drafted and signed to play with them, and to the coach hired to lead them. It was never their job to look at the organization as a whole and judge what was working and what wasn’t. They had to focus on their own game first, then on the guys playing next to them.
"One-on-one? You can't." -Gilbert Arenas
JC Bandwagon all day!
by kseandoyle on Oct 22, 2009 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This council should consist of one man and one man only...

by pas493 on Oct 22, 2009 3:46 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Definitely
an improvement!
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
by Scott E on Oct 22, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haahha
I would love to see a franchise team owned by Snyder and run by Vinny and Millen.
9 draft picks … 9 WRs
by KevinE on Oct 22, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thought I like the idea
of a commitee such as this and I sort of had a similar thought while reading the article about the Cooke family losing the team, I do not know if those guys could provide much else other than nostalgia. Sure they could tell everyone in the room how it was back then, and how it should be now, how players of their era cared about the franchise and its legacy and being a Redskin. But how is that going to help in choosing the best players for the team when it comes down to player selection? Are they going to advise scouts on which players to look for in college? Would someone, Danny or someone else, listen to these guys and their opinions as far as talent goes in todays world?
All players from college are unproven and you have no idea what kind of heart they have and if they would truely love representing this team and doing everything possible to keep this team together, playing as one and not individuals. But majority of this team, and most teams nowadays, are made up of individuals with huge paychecks. That alone will KILL any thought of making a team or organization like the good old days. The more I think about it, is there even any team in the league right now who has that sort of back bone where they want to be part of the team and be apart of what the team stands for? The first team that came to mind for some reason was Green Bay but since the Favre era is over, even once mighty GB seems to have lost its pride, its back bone, of the storied franchise. I honestly cant think of any team right now that the players truely play for the team, for the city of that team, and its fans, like they used to do back in the day.
Et lux in tenebris lucet
by burgundyNgold on Oct 22, 2009 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the point...
is basically we need to clean house, top to bottom, and get a core of young talent together who will play for us for years to come. And after improving upon that core, the wins will start to happen, and this team will start to be reckoned with, and hopefully a new generation of players will feel loyal to this team and what it means to be a Redskin again, and other players will WANT to be apart of that again.
Et lux in tenebris lucet
by burgundyNgold on Oct 22, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
please remember
I’m not suggesting that this committee pick players. I am suggesting that this committee help establish a direction for the team and help pick the contemporary football mind who will build the franchise back. This new GM would still make the decisions on player personnel. The lesson that we have the opportunity to learn here is that we need to get a bona-fide football mind and we need to not get in his way. I wouldn’t suggest that this committee would interfere with the player acquisition. That would be the responsibility of the new GM.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please Remember
I’m not suggesting that this committee pick players. I am suggesting that this committee help establish a direction for the team and help pick the contemporary football mind who will build the franchise back. This new GM would still make the decisions on player personnel. The lesson that we have the opportunity to learn here is that we need to get a bona-fide football mind and we need to not get in his way. I wouldn’t suggest that this committee would interfere with the player acquisition. That would be the responsibility of the new GM.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of the all time great blog paragraphs
Intermission 1: By the way, every time I write the word ‘Cerrato", a red squiggly line appears beneath as if I have misspelled a word. I know that all I have to do is right-click and add the word to the dictionary. But I can’t bring myself to do it. I am so hopeful that he gets fired that I can’t even add him to my dictionary. It’s as if the little red squiggly line is my own protest to Snyder that Cerrato is not even dictionary-worthy.
Dude that is just briliant, ’dictionary-worthy" just f*kin brilliant, sorry I know you are not meant to swear but I jsut had too to get across how brilliant I think that is, dictionary worthy, you are a genius!!
Pommylee
by Pommylee on Oct 22, 2009 5:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to admit
I giggled a bit when I wrote that.
by monk81 on Oct 22, 2009 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's the thing
I’m seeing people talk about former players “knowing what it’s like to be a Redskin” and “being proud to be a Redskin.” It would be great if that was as common today as it was in the 80s and early 90s. But it’s not Dan Snyder who killed that spirit. It’s free agency. There’s nothing we can do about the fact that players go to the highest bidders and therefore have little loyalty to the team they play for. There are guys who are definitely proud to be Redskins — Cooley, Sellers, Cartwright, Fletcher, Smoot, Thrash, Taylor (RIP). But those guys are the exception now, not the rule. We have to accept that, especially with a coach who will give a player all the worldly riches he could ever imagine, we’re not going to get guys coming to DC because they really really wanted to be a part of this franchise, just like we don’t have veterans sticking around with the team because we know they still have something to contribute to the team.
"One-on-one? You can't." -Gilbert Arenas
JC Bandwagon all day!
by kseandoyle on Oct 22, 2009 11:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LOOK at THIS! ,,, Actual Costs per Redskins Game!
Are These Losers WORTH IT?
(I WILL UPDATE THIS POST after EVERY GAME!)
$107,000,000 …. Annual Payroll
$6,687,000 …….. Per Game
$111,458 ……….. Per Game Minute (no OT)
$1,857 …………… Per Game Second (no OT)
So Far this Year:
$20,061,000 …… Cost per Win (2)
$3,343,500 …….. Cost for Offense (per game)
$41,793 …………. Cost per Offensive Point (80)
$35,569 …………. Cost per Offensive First Down (94)
$1,138 …………… Cost per Offensive Yard (2938)
.333 ………………. Winning Percentage (2-4)
Does NOT NOT NOT include any COACHES or STAFF salaries!
Can it get any worse?
Boycott Snyder!,
Josh Baker
SacktheSkins.com
featuring the Official Dan Snyder Dartboard
Now Available at SacktheSkins.com:
Official “Boycott Snyder” T-Shirts
Official Dan Snyder Dartboard
Official Dan Snyder Foam Finger (middle finger!)
Josh Baker
RedskinsGloryDays.com
(Rare Redskins T-Shirts, Hats, Stickers, etc)
SportsRowdy.com
by SportsRowdy.com on Oct 23, 2009 12:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
NO!
This is a terrible idea. The fact that he already listens to guys who have no clue whats going on with the current roster and arent involved in day to day activities is what has killed this team. I’m pretty sure Dan Snyder only listens to these guys. Yeah, they were great when it was there time but riggins and doug williams arent suiting up anytime soon. We need to get a modern football mind to run the show, someone from the outside in the current NFL to come in and revamp this team. Until that happens, no committe of veterns and former skins are gonna help anything. Its easy for sonny to sit in the booth and critique the team Cause he only see’s three hours on sunday, but we need someone who can come in day one and change the culture. Tear it down, and then rebuild it. This would be the same as signing another former vetern for crazy money when we dont need him. Sorry, I just dont see it.
by BandWagonJumper on Oct 23, 2009 4:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I will say this
and then back off. I only want these guys to pick the guy who will actually do the building. I don not want these guys to build anything. I would not want these guys to make player personnel decisions. I only want these to consult on a direction for the team and a GM and then back off. If you already got that from the post, then we will agree to disagree on what would be best for the Redskins going forward. I know this is an idea that has not been tried and I know it’s a bit out there. I am just spit-balling and trying to come up with some way to save snyder from himself. Whatever the process is, it has to exclude snyder in some way or at least give him the best information to make the best decision. That is where this idea comes from.
by monk81 on Oct 23, 2009 8:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
An upgrade to Dan Snyder

I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
by GeoFly on Oct 23, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd. for creativity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvIX3S0f-2c&feature=player_embedded
by VA_Skin on Oct 25, 2009 7:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















