Boldly Hoping Where No Hope Has Helped Before, Vol 1

by KevinE on Jan 12, 2009 10:08 AM EST Comment 1 comment

Welcome to the first installment of what should be a highly speculative, pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey style of Redskins' offseason coverage. In this edition of Boldly Hoping, let's line up a dream scenario for the draft.

Forget for a moment that Vinny thinks teams should not draft for need. Forget for a moment that Vinny thinks drafting defensive linemen is dumb. Damnit...forget for a moment Vinny is our default-GM. Ahhhhhhhhhhh...

What if we were to attack an area in the same manner as we did with receiver in last year's draft? In this case, the line of scrimmage. In our fantasy scenario, we propose a few trades to better our draft position. I would like to see Carlos Rogers come back. I really would. But the rumblings are that he is unhappy with his spot on the defense (presumably behind DeAngelo Hall), and it looks like the money he thinks he should get is about to go to Hall. If the CBA situation comes to a head next year, he loses his unrestricted free agency. This offseason would be a good time for the Skins to get a pretty decent draft pick for him, and the team trading for Rogers could turn that frown upside down with a new long-term contract. Everyone wins.

And what about Randle-El? What would his trade value be? Surely it does not reside in his return abilities. But he is a decent receiver. On a team with a pass-happy offense, he could fill the Wes Welker-type role (albeit as a 3rd receiver). Small, fast, smart, hard to keep up with underneath. It's not that we can't use Randle-El, it is simply there is a MAJOR problem at Redskins Park that needs to be handled during THIS offseason. The team simply feels compelled to start older veterans that are healthy and getting paid. This past season, you wouldn't hear me argue that Devin Thomas was ready to supplant Randle-El in the lineup. But next year, he simply must be given those reps. You can't convince me that Chad Rhinehart couldn't have done the job Pete Kendall did for us on the line. You can't convince me that Stephon Heyer is/was not at least as craptacular as Jansen was all season (when healthy). A youth movement means going with younger guys. Bugel is notorious for his loyalty to the older guys. Now it looks like Kendall could be gone, and what do we really know about Rhinehart?

Rogers will get us our 2nd rounder back I would bet. Randle-El could get us a 4th or 5th rounder I hope. If we traded future picks this offseason, I would like to see them traded to acquire picks in this year's draft (as opposed to veteran players). Assuming we could net a 2nd rounder in this fashion, let's imagine a 1st day with one 1st rounder, two 2nd round picks, and one 3rd round selection. With those picks, here is what i want to see: 1 OT, 2 DE/OLB, 1 OG/C.

From what I am reading, it appears that there will be some pretty decent offensive line depth in the upcoming draft. If that ends up being the case, let's take the best DE/OLB prospect available at #13 overall. A Brian Cushing from USC or Aaron Curry from Wake Forest would be huge for us, since Marcus Washington seems to be on his way out the door. We missed the boat on Shawne Merriman and DeMarcus Ware...who knows if these guys can fill that mold, but I think that should be our goal.

In the 2nd round, we go for the best OL (preferrably Tackle) available. Given the rush of skill players into the draft this year (underclassmen QB, RB, and WR), a decent crop of otherwise first-round worthy offensive linemen are getting pushed into the 2nd round. If we can get someone to start opposite Samuels on Day One, we win.

With our remaining pick(s) in the top 3 rounds, I would love to see us go after a Center and another DE/OLB.

Let's face it, they are going to let Samuels and Fletcher play until their wheels fall off--and probably rightfully so. Jason Taylor has 1 more year with us, perhaps. We need some talent to be able to come in next year and solidify the right side of the offensive line and bolster a linebacking corps that will be heavily relied upon in the pass rush, both from the end (with their hands on the ground), as well from the LB spots.

FOUR impact players on the first day of the draft--at the area where we need it most in 2009? That is Bold Hoping indeed.

We will certainly refine the segment and focus harder on actual events and stategies either employed by the Redskins or woefully neglected by them. Please feel free to add your own thoughts as we have all come to realize, if Vinny can do it, it just can't be that hard.

0 recs | Comment 1 comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Read More: 2009, draft, deangelo, kendall, redskins, fletcher, vinny, hall, rogers, samuels

Comments

When distilled

the basic theme to this offseason is cutting fat. The trick is to cut the fat in the right places.

This starts with Rogers. I don’t see the Skins giving him up. That would definitely be cutting fat in the wrong places. Blache himself said that he’s come of age, like a fine wine. Blache also builds his D off of a strong secondary. Springs is a great vet, but his shelf life is near expiry and his long term value is non existent when juxtaposed to Rogers. DeAngelo fell into the Skins’ lap like mana from heaven in that story. Not resigning him would be silly.

Thus to hope against hope, I’d start with keeping Rogers and DeAngelo. Cut/trade Springs, use the cap to resign Hall and let Smoot and Tryon play backup. I’d be happy cutting Taylor or resigning him for something less than the arm and leg he’s costing. I envision him as more of a SLB next year than solely an end, and this shift may well relieve the Skins dearth of LBs (especially if an end falls to us somehow, say a Suggs, either by FA or draft). Griffin is a major cog, and I’d keep him despite his price tag and injury history. Washington is out, especially if Taylor remains.

The Skins need a stud on both of their lines. They can often be found in the later first day rounds, but with the 13th pick the Skins can get an immediate starter. Trading down would likely result in some lag before the player came around, and the Skins need some juice now. With that said I’d keep the first round pick unless O and D line were gone by then, or unless there was an offer that couldn’t be refused. If the lines are depleted by 13 I could see the skins entertaining the idea of getting a top LB to replace Washington.

The back end of our draft should be full of O linemen and LBs. Our special teams had some issues, and that can be tracked back to the fact that LB depth wasn’t there. Putting Geisinger in at LT was horrid, and should never have happened.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Skins also picked a speed back in the later rounds, ala Ahmad Bradshaw, as they really only have two Bona Fide TB’s on the roster (see the kneejerk hiring of Alexander). I think its about time for Cartwright to be considered a return man and not use the third RB spot on him.

I’m interested to see what kind of compensatory picks are awarded. I know Prieola (spelling?) played a bit for Jaxonville. I’m not sure if Lloyd will garner us anything, as he was cut, but his season wasn’t half bad. If Kenny Wright garnered a sixth, Todd Wade may as well (he also went to Jax if I’m not mistaken). Brunnell didn’t play in regular season this year, but again, his value may be equal to Wright’s.

Either way, we’ll have to do a good job of grabbing depth with them and with the later round picks. No more safeties. No late round corners. Go line. Go Line backers.

TTB!

by Ach on Jan 12, 2009 6:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs