After the First Game, 5 Burning Questions
First off, I should be back more on a semi-regular basis. Football season is here... which also means school is here... which means I'm at my computer more. Skin Patrol should be around more as well.. so hopefully, there will be more content. So tell all your friends. And have them tell their friends. And so on. Then we might have double digit readers.
Secondly, I only saw bits and pieces of the game last night. I was in the midst of travelling (2 hours in the air, 4 on the ground) so it was hard to sit and watch the game for long periods of time. But I did see enough to come up with 5 burning questions for the now-underway season. So, here we go:
1. Can Jason Taylor (the one big addition) help the pass rush and, therefore, the defense improve in 2008?
Short answer: I don't think so. And I say that because last season's defense was 8th in overall defense, 11th in scoring defense and 6th in the league in 3rd down percentage. But they were near the bottom in the league with only 24 takeaways and only 33 sacks, 2 areas where even an aging Jason Taylor should help. I don't see them jumping into the elite 2 or 3 defenses in the league, which is why I say I can't see the addition of a proven pass rusher improving the 2008 defense.
2. The offense... wtf?
and
3. Is Jason Campbell the real deal?
After last night, there is no other way of putting it. Yes, it is a new offensive system. Yes, JC is still a (relatively) young starting NFL QB. And yes, the offense looked just as bad as it did in 2006 and for large chunks of 2007.
Realize, it will take a while for the West Coast Offense to get settled in. Most so-called "experts" say 2 to 3 years. But with the running game remaining almost entirely intact from a season ago, it should lessen the time it takes for the offense to take hold. And despite the offense system, there should be a moment where the light comes on for JC. Something that even the most casual fan can recognize... which, as Jules said, is "what alcoholics refer to as a 'moment of clarity.'"
4. What can we expect from Jim Zorn the head coach?
This is a real wild card question... mostly because no one (including Jim Zorn himself) has any idea. He has never been a head coach... on any level. The things that head coaches live and die by are the suttle in game decisions: Punt or go for it? When to use the timeouts? To challenge a call or not? This is a learning process for Zorn... and for us as we watch to see if he makes the right decisions in the right spots or not. I have no answer... and anyone says they have one is a liar or crazy.
5. Jim Zorn, the offensive play-caller?
Again, another unknown. This is the logical step for any offensive assistant: position to offensive coordinator to head coach. Zorn is taking on the last 2 steps all at once. A lot of what I said above applies here. The most interesting part of this for me is that his play calling as offensive coordinator will determine a lot of the decisions he has to make as head coach. I think this will be a much easier transition for the former NFL QB. That an learning under Holmgren has a pretty good track record.
Feel free to weigh in. What's your question? Or which one of these intrigues you most?
- - -
And, as part of an ongoing tradition around these parts, I bring you my official picks for the Second Annual Blogger Deathsport. Expect Skin Patrol's soon and, as always, lines courtesy of Yahoo!:
WAS @ NYG (-3.5)
Sun
ARZ (2.5) @ SF
SEA @ BUF (-1)
CIN (-1) @ BAL
DAL (-5.5) @ CLE
DET (-3) @ ATL
CHI @ IND (-9.5)
JAX (-3) @ TEN
KC @ NE (NL)
TB @ NO (-3)
NYJ (-3) @ MIA
STL @ PHI (-7.5)
HOU @ PIT (-6.5)
CAR @ SD (-9)
Mon
DEN (-3) @ OAK
MIN @ GB (-2.5) MIN 20 - GB 17
My fingers hurt. I need to get back into football (blogging) shape.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Ya ya ya
you win this round with your Pulp Fiction reference.
Sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie but I’ll never know because I wouldn’t eat the filthy mother fucker, or something like that.
by Skin Patrol on Sep 6, 2008 1:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Historical update, No Hysterics
2007/8 Superbowl Winner lost the first 2 games of the season, talk was about QB not doing the job and the Coach does not have control…just a thought
by dr WNC on Sep 6, 2008 8:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it's the national television thing, season opener
A 9 point loss to a division rival on teh road sucks, but 0-1 is hardly the end of a season, a quarterback/coach’s career, etc. However, since we lost on national television, since we were the first loser of the young season and because everyone has been anticipating FOOTBALL for so long, the talking is much more severe than would typically be warranted from one result. Our loss to the Giants, which was heightened because many felt it wasn’t as close as the score, IS football until some more games are played. Water cooler discussion is dominated by Thursday night’s game.
Our team has a bunch of story lines that lend themselves to quick conclusions as well. New head coach and a young, unproven quarterback are both good places to start. The sample size on Zorn’s career is no one loss to the Giants, so its natural for people to reason out the rest of his career as a failure, because they’ve got nothing to go on besides that. Similarly, as this has been billed as Campbell’s make or break season, the only evidence so far is that he’s broken.
It would be the exact opposite had we won; we’d be here talking about how Jim Zorn is clearly the second coming of Joe Gibbs 1.0, how brilliant the staff was for picking him, how he’s going to coach 14 wins this year, etc. The fact is, whatever happened on Thursday, win or lose, the conclusions we’d reach were more likely than not going to be bombastic. More realistically, Zorn’s coaching career will be neither as bad this moment nor as good as his first win. It’s simply too early to claim knowledge of where this team will finish based exclusively on a sample size of one.
But damn did that offense look pathetic…
by Skin Patrol on Sep 6, 2008 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pathetic, with a capital P
Yes, the offense is a disappointment.
I thought Zorn would be inventive in the play calling, he was not he was conservative.
I would rather see Cambell throw a 50% interception ratio than to not have confidence to throw the ball in rhythm
but it was one game
by dr WNC on Sep 6, 2008 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone owes Campbell
A rebate; 6 different offenses in 7 years? That’s like learning a different language every year and being expected to use it at work. In martial arts there is the concept of trying to avoid training that teaches the wrong reflex. If Zorn is gone next year Campbell should say “FU, cut me”
by The Pale Scot on Sep 6, 2008 8:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If all options are less than optimal,
Choose the one with the best future prospects, where’s Steinberg going to go next. Jason’s better off in say, Minnesota,? or Baltimore,? or Miami? All have established programs looking for a few missing pieces. It’s got to be better than meeting new coach Jimmy Johnson.
by The Pale Scot on Sep 7, 2008 8:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

















