Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Questions I Would Ask the Coaches at S.E.C. Media Days Bar-right-arrows



How good are Your Washington Redskins?

I'm done with Law School year uno, so here I am, back, returning to regular treatment in this space. All apologies (but for serious, I was busy) for my absence.

 

The loooooong offseason drags on. And on. And on. Content is light today, which I hadn't anticipated seeing as how I've been gone since the middle of last week. But really there isn't much of interest happening. Perhaps that's best; no news means no one has a hurt hamstring.

As Redskins 360 notes, ESPN finally got their act together and released their first top-to-bottom NFL ranking of the season. I find these exercises especially useless as predictors, though don't formulate that opinion on reliance of data I'm unwilling to sort out. I just happen to think preseason rankings are, by necessity, overwhelmingly speculative. Of course since I don't actually do any real reporting, speculation is really all we have here at Hogs Haven, so don't interpret my skepticism on the product as reluctance to speculate. Speculate away you crazies.

Here's what ESPN says about Your Washington Redskins (not placed in blockquotes, because I can't figure out how to put it in blockquotes without engulfing the entire post; I'm not a wise man):

14 (10) Redskins 9-7-0 Too many questions: a new coach, young QB and a pair of rookie WRs. Hard to get a good read. (MM)

That's 14th now, 10th at the end of last year's 9-7 season, and can't say I disagree with the uncertainty conclusion reached by the following responsible gentlemen:

• Mike Sando on the AFC East and NFC West
• James Walker on the AFC North and NFC North
• Pat Yasinskas on the AFC South and NFC South
• Bill Williamson on the AFC West
• Matt Mosley on the NFC East

 

Our voters, who also include staff writer John Clayton and Scouts Inc. Insiders Jeremy Green and Keith Kidd, had diverse takes on what offseason moves mean to various teams.

The Redskins are especially difficult to measure in the 2008 season since we have a Head Coach with no proven background in that position. As Redskins 360 pointed out, the highest ranking the Redskins had was 10th, meaning the consensus view was that the Redskins are, at best, no better off now as a result of Head Coach Jim Zorn than they were before. I don't think that's unusual -- you don't simply follow a Hall of Fame Coach with no coaching resume expecting red carpet treatment -- but there are plenty of reasons to remain confident that it ain't true.

For example, Jim Zorn didn't inherit the same team Coach Gibbs left. Notably he inherited that team plus a whole bunch of draft picks, and depending on their contribution to this team we could be a lot better off now than we were in 2007. (Profundity warning: We also could be a lot worse off. That's deep analysis, for sure. Consider yourselves blessed.)

The real eye opener is that we're last in the NFC East. That's hardly surprising when it comes to the World Champion Giants (I just puked in my mouf a little bit) and the many, many win Cowboys, but the Eagles? It was close, but I wonder about that result. And I also wonder what you wonder about that result, as there's a poll added, as much to test that feature as it is to vet the opinion of all seven of you.

Big Blue View, Wednesday Walk Around the League

Poll
Rank the Redskins in the NFC East in 2008
  • Division winnah!
  • 2nd (and playoffs, because it's the NFC East)
  • 3rd (and playoffs... because it's the NFC)
  • Dead last

  203 votes | Results

0 recs | Comment 11 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Full disclosure

I went with division winnah, because I have no shame.

Go register. Or else.

by Skin Patrol on May 12, 2008 3:45 PM EDT   0 recs

I'm an idiot...

and you beat me… while I was typing. Feel free to delete.

Yes, I am a nerd.

by TexSkins on May 12, 2008 3:50 PM EDT   0 recs

4 minutes... ouch.

I r teh slo typahrrr.

Yes, I am a nerd.

by TexSkins on May 12, 2008 3:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

We'll keep them both up.

I’ll bet you more people respond in your post, which is just SO typical of these spiteful Hogs Haven readers.

Go register. Or else.

by Skin Patrol on May 12, 2008 4:02 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Dude...

if you subtract your comments and mine… it’ll be CaptChaos.

So we’ll tie with one each.

Yes, I am a nerd.

by TexSkins on May 12, 2008 4:13 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

lol true

we don’t get the most activity on this site. However the content is excellent and I defn prefer this to lots of posts with no thought put into them.

by CptChaosSidekick on May 12, 2008 4:42 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Power Rankings

are completly usless like a scratch & sniff sticker would be to Hellen Keller. Case in point the BCS. How the hell can you rank teams before they play a game and or how good their oponent is.

NFC East: I can make a case for any team winning this thing. At the end of the year philly was playing great, we all know what the G-men did, Dallas is explosive, and your Redskins, had they scored one more TD in most game would have an intirely diffrent record.

Personally I think Dallas has more pressure on them than anyother team. They’re under the gun. TO is getting old FA next yr, Marion Barber III contract status is uncertain as that of Terrance Newman. Coach is on the hottest of seats, better atleast get to the conferance game and that might not even be enough.

I forsee another dogfight tough game of Rock Paper Scissors to determine the winner in this division.

by CptChaosSidekick on May 12, 2008 4:24 PM EDT   0 recs

speaking of posts with no comment put into them

my bud over at blogging the boys pointed out very clearly that I failed at humor in reguards to my Hellen Keller joke, that epically failed. Sigh…I will redeem myself some how

by CptChaosSidekick on May 12, 2008 4:45 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I read a book

called Lie’s My History Teacher Told Me that alleged Hellen Keller was a famous supporter of the socialist cause, an outspoken feminist, and in frequent battle with, I believe, President Wilson. All I ever knew about her was that she was blind and deaf, which is apparently only a very tiny aspect of who she was.

Anyways, your efforts didn’t fail, I noticed brother.

Go register. Or else.

by Skin Patrol on May 13, 2008 3:12 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Redskins ranking

There are three critical questions in my mind, which will impact the Redskins record this coming season:

1) What kind of coach will Jim Zorn be? (Corollary is the new offensive scheme with several new coaches.)
2) How quickly will Campbell pick up the new passing game and change his techniques so that when he plays he is reacting versus thinking?
3) Will the Redskins be healthy (relatively speaking) this year?

The Redskins lost a lot of close games last year. Primarily due to an anemic offense that could not convert 3rd downs nor produce points in the Red Zone. A large part of this was due to an ever changing offensive line that was beset with injuries throughout the year. Another part of it was due to apparent problems in offensive game plans and play calling – this was in part due to Campbell’s learning curve, the injuries in the line effecting what could be called.

Due to the offensive failure, it produced huge pressure on the defense and kept them on the field much too long and at strategical times. Then the injuries started to take its toll on the defense only to be compounded by the tragic death of the all-pro Sean Taylor (who was probably destined to be a Hall of Famer).

The Redskins were down 7 starters for a significant portion of the season. How many teams could make the playoffs under such circumstances?

Therefore, if the Redskins stay relatively healthy on the lines, if one of the rookie WR’s actually produces the first year, if Campbell adapts quickly, if we do not suffer with Smoot and Doughty, then the Redskins should be in hunt in NFC East. There is the potential.

Yes, I know, this is a lol of if’s!

by saratogan on May 13, 2008 9:29 AM EDT   0 recs

3rd downs and redzone

I recall, as you did, that both those aspects of the Redskins game were subpar and we suffered as a result. Teams like the 2007 Redskins don’t need to change all that many aspects of their game to go from 9-7 to 12-4 (I’m getting ahead of myself) because, as you said, so many of our games were lost on the slimmest of margins.

That’s one of the reason to be happy with our day one of the draft. We picked up three large receiving targets that give us more options on… third downs and redzone situations. You need tall, possession receivers to move chains. Incidentally, both Kelly and Thomas are redzone threats. The latter is especially talented after he’s got the ball in his hand, which forces the defense to cover a whole lot more of the field than the relatively small area between either of the guards (where we routinely ran, and failed) on third downs in the redzone).

Go register. Or else.

by Skin Patrol on May 13, 2008 3:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Please imagine that this is something witty, moving, or insightful.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
HHFFL?
Burger-king_small
NFL Fox Predicts Redskins to Win Superbowl
Art_monk_small
Clinton Portis to Miss First Preseason Game
Art_monk_small
How One of the Biggest Upsets in NCAA Football history and the Redskins Connect
Art_monk_small
Afternoon Update
Art_monk_small
Portis "Turns" Ankle
Art_monk_small
Morning Newsings, Practice Cancelled?, London Fletcher Absent From Practice!?
Oriole1_small
Adios, Jeremy Shockey...
Art_monk_small
Monday: Jason Taylor Press Conference
Small
Addition by (unfortunate) Subtraction

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter