Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

We're doomed; it's the quarterbacks!

Per Extreme Skins because ESPN has protected its content through subscription from the swinish multitudes, among which I consider myself a member (this is a haven for Hogs, afterall). But anyways, allegedly ESPN Insider ranked all 32 team's quarterback position and we damn near closed the list, finishing 30th:

30. Washington Redskins
With a full offseason as the starter, young Jason Campbell is expected to show vast improvement in 2007 and take over this team. He has excellent overall skills, a strong arm and a potentially outstanding deep ball, but he makes bad decisions at times and throws into coverage. The hope is that another year in the offensive system will help his recognition. The coaches will also utilize a run-oriented offense to take the pressure off. Veteran Mark Brunell restructured his contract to stay as Campbell's mentor and backup. Even though his skills and arm strength are diminishing, he still knows this offense and his leadership and poise could be invaluable if Campbell falters and he was forced to play. The No. 3 QB will be Todd Collins. He has a great grasp of this offense and he's probably better than a lot of No. 2 QBs in this league.
Well shit, given the (alleged) analysis, I'd love to see how they rank the teams that finished well, given that we sound positively stacked even per their pronunciation. So:

Starting QB "expected to show vast improvement in 2007" + "Veteran" backup that " knows this offense and his leadership and poise could be invaluable if" the unthinkable happens to Starting QB + 3rd string QB "probably better than a lot of No. 2 QBs in this league" = 30th.

It's also worth noting that this analysis presumes lying on the part of the Washington Post, as they explicitly stated that the Redskins would not keep both Mark Brunell and Todd Collins. I also wonder about this nonsense about The Mustache's tendency to make bad decisions by throwing into coverage. There were a lot of things that frustrated me about Campbell as a quarterback last year -- most notably his completion % (which we forgive because it was his first year and his Mustache is well-groomed) -- but throwing the ball away was not one of them. On 207 attempts, Jason threw just 6 interceptions, or just under 2.9 INT%. That ranks him above a bunch of quarterbacks who I'm sure the author of said analysis thinks more highly of. To name a few: Brett Favre, Matt Leinart, Chad Pennington, Eli Manning, Vince Young, John Kitna, Tony Romo, Matt Hassleback, Rex Grossman, and Ben Roethlisberger. That doesn't mean he's necessarily a better QB than the rest of those guys, it just means I find that particular criticism a bit unfair; if Jason were a dangerously cocksure individual that threw passes down field with reckless abandon, it would have reflected as more in his statistics than just 6 picks. I was very impressed with JC's 10:6 TD:Int ratio considering the circumstances. But whatever.

Seriously though, I'd much rather have J.P. Losman, Craig Nall, and Trent Edwards than JC/Brunell/Bramlet (or whoever). Am I right or am I right? What about the destructive combination of Charlie Frye backed up by Brady Quinn backed up by Ken Dorsey; YEE HAW! Are Josh McCown and Andrew Walter really that much better now that JeMarcus Russell is in town?

Sarcasm aside, Jason "The Mustached Madman" Campbell is still in the growth period of his career, and has a lot to prove before the haters silence. This analysis worries me not one bit heading into the 2007 season, given what we've already seen from Campbell on the field, as I'm absolutely confident he will do just that. Avoid the JC bandwagon at your own risk, World.

Update [2007-7-9 18:3:13 by Skin Patrol]: Speaking of quarterbacks, Hail Redskins has their quarterback training camp preview that's definitely worth a gander. They predict Campbell + Brunell with Bramlet the favorite for the last spot and Palmer going to the practice squad. Sounds about right.
The Redskin Report, The Birth of the Washington Redskins and more linking

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Collins is better than most #2s...
HA!

Shows what research they did for this one...

Off the top of my head, and using SP's list, the Skins have a better QB situation that CLE, HOU, OAK, BUF, MIN, and possibly KC and DET.  That's a 27-25 range.

I'm not saying, I'm just saying...

by TexSkins on Jul 10, 2007 6:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who will we be pursuing this FA 2012?
Small
I'm Torn...
Small
Manning to Texans
Orange_moon_at_nationals_park_small
Solve QB; I almost don't care how!
Small
Are we Really Mortgaging the future with a trade up for RG3?
Redskins2_small
Rocky McIntosh to Rams?
Desert_small
The GM's plan to turn it around in 2012
Pcinoz_1__small
2012 Salary Cap Position
Small
Does RG3 Start from Day 1?
Redskins_logo_small
My agenda as Redskins GM

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins