Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

To what degree should "we" identify with the Redskins?

Post inspired by comments made by Big Blue View regular SBakerTheTouchdownMaker in response to the BBV Five Questions with Hogs Haven. Make sure you dip on over there to check out my largely incoherent rants to Ed's probing questions.

Anyways, SBakerTheTouchdownMaker noted that I used "we" to refer to the Redskins. I did this subconciously, and probably do so a lot here at Hogs Haven, as I've never actually established to myself that I'm a member of the Washington Redskins. In fact, I'm not. In fact, they probably wouldn't want to have anything to do with me. Most of the time, I don't even want to have much to do with me.

But that feeling isn't mutual. The Redskins would exist sans Skin Patrol, but Hogs Haven is utterly derivative of the Redskins and that's just the way I like it.

The question here and presented towards reader(s) then, is whether I'm justified in personally identifying with the team. I justifiably refer to my alma mater as "we" when discussing athletics, because I have a demonstrable investment in the team, in the form of a piece of paper with my name on it (that I think I've since lost). But what connection do I have with the Redskins?

We could add financial, as directly and indirectly I have contributed funds to my beloved Redskins. But let us not limit financial spending merely to moneys pocketed by the Washington Redskins; I've "invested" hundreds of dollars into the pockets of Dallas Cowboys fans via lost bets through a horrible many-moons long losing streak we suffered nearly uninterrupted from 1997 through 2004. [One more reason to love Coach Gibbs, by the way, is that he figured out how to beat the Cowgirls.] But my financial suffering lacks regard for whether it bulges the pockets of Cowboys fans or whether it purchases Dick Clark. Worse in the former case, actually, since you also have to suffer the inevitable gloating (see: Emotional Health).

We could add emotional health, as my girlfriend can attest suffers through losses and builds through wins. Nothing slows a work week more than a loss, especially to a division rival. You wouldn't have wanted to be around me September 17th of last year, though had you caught me January 7th after our postseason win over the Bucs, your drink(s) would have been free (see: Financial).

Is that enough? I ask semi-rhetorically because I really couldn't give a damn. I will continue to identify myself with the Redskins even if they wouldn't have anything to do with me and even if I have no reasonable justification for it. Irrational and unconditional love for one's favorite team may not be healthy. But neither is drinking, and I never bother justifying that.

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

You are absolutely justified
being a sports fan is about being emotionally invested.  It is about willingly giving time and money.  If that doesn't make us part of the team I don't know what does.  

We all us the 'we' whether it be on a blog, in the bar or at home.

by WCG on Jun 20, 2007 2:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

if I hadn't worked with you so
much in the past few months I might be ticked off that a Skins fan and me agree so often.:)

by WCG on Jun 20, 2007 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I tend to take the other side...
I think that the team is the team and fans are fans.  They are a major part of what the team does and there is a huge investment, in terms of time, emotion and money... but having said that, the team is an organization in and of itself.

I try to avoid the used of "we" and "us" when dealing with the teams I follow (including my beloved Skins) but I am not part of that team.

I think there is a difference between what I just said (my team) and the usage of "we" or another word that includes the fan with the team.  I have teams that matter to me, and they are therefore "my" teams.  But I am not part in the decision making or the actual playing... so when referencing the team, I cannot bring myself to say we.

I could just be me... or it could be my belief in the inherent power of words... but I think there is a distinction that has to be made.

by TexSkins on Jun 20, 2007 5:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

New rule
Only registered commenters/diarists/frontpagers on HogsHaven are allowed to refer to the Redskins as "we."

by Burgundy and Gold on Jun 20, 2007 6:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

We're sorry
Big Blue View Nation apparently owes Hogs Haven an apology. We had no idea you were such an emotional basket case, and that answering our probing questions (participating in our Vulcan mind-meld) would lead to such angst. We deeply regret causing you such distress. Now, go have a few drinks and quit worrying about it!

Ed
BigBlueView

by ETVal on Jun 20, 2007 11:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Weeeeeee!
I believe oyu are justified.  I've noticed that everyone on this blog uses "we" instead of "The Redskins".  I do it consciously and nearly religiously.  I have an emotional attachment to the team, the only pro sports team which I would claim to have such a link to...the remainder are schools which I attended.  Financially, I helped pay bloated contracts to vets whom are equally so.  
Personally, I've even taken on the pain-staking conversion of my wife-who claims the cowgurls (I coulda sworn she said Rams...I told her that I would have never married her if I knew she liked "Canada's Team".  But considering she knew i loved my skins, she kept mum until the '05-'06 season, when we were already married (treacherous winch).

Short answer...you and everyone else who suffers pain because of the organizations short-comings (or the completely unwarranted attacks from Dallas fans) can collectively refer the the 'Skins and themselves as "WE".

by JustinU804 on Jun 21, 2007 9:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My girlfriend
doesn't really follow the NFL -- she loves CFB though -- but her and her family claim the Dallas Cowboys as well. It's quite an ordeal.

by Skin Patrol on Jun 21, 2007 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com
Start posting about the Redskins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Thefalcoholic_small
Ask The Falcoholic!
Small
2010 Draft - Offensive Line
Small
The 2010 Redskins offense
Small
D-line, Cartwright make Skins worth watching

Recent FanPosts

Skinsdallas_small
The future is NOW.....
Small
What we have.....
Small
Realistic Re-Cap needed please
Small
Trade Portis & other over-the-hill bums
Skinsdallas_small
I got a funny feeling......
Lavarr_small
Uniform Change
H2_logo_b_small
Looks Like Hunter the Punter Out For Sunday
Small
Riggo or Blache...
Lavarr_small
3-4 Defense
Small
Need some help guys, going to the game next week.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom: Nov 9th, 2009
Behind the Steel Curtain
BTSC Weekly NFL Musings - Week 9 Edition
Blogging The Boys
Understudy Sunday: the Cowboys Outslug the Eagles 20-16

SPONSORS


Managers

Superbowl_small KevinE

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

H2_logo_b_small Sugar

Authors

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol