Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NHL Trade Rumors: Do You Make A Move For Rick Nash?

Draft Talk Already?

Why not. If the draft were held today, the Redskins would have the 7th pick. Right now the most glaring needs are on the defensive side of the ball, specifically in the secondary and on the defensive line. Middle linebacker also comes up in needs-discussions.

My personal opinion is that we should draft the best value at either D-Line or Secondary (emphasizing pass rush and coverage respectively).

Scout Inc's Top Dogs at those positions (overall ranking):

  1. Alan Branch DT Michigan
  2. Gaines Adams DE Clemson
    In 2005, he took over as the starting "bandit" DE and made 56 total tackles, 15 tackles for loss, 9.5 sacks, 29 quarterback pressures, and three forced fumbles.

  3. Glenn Dorsey DT LSU
  4. Leon Hall CB Michigan
    Hall then started all 12 games in 2005, registering 61 total tackles, three tackles for loss, two sacks, four interceptions, nine pass breakups, one forced fumble, and one fumble recovery. Over the past three seasons, he has also returned 14 punts for 163 yards (11.6 average) and one touchdown. Hall lacks elite size and speed, but he is a physical and aggressive cover corner with very good quickness, instincts and ball skills.

  5. LaRon Landry S LSU
    He once again started every game (13) in 2005 registering 69 total tackles, four tackles for loss, one sack, three interceptions, and eight pass breakups. Over the past three seasons, Landry has seen time at free safety, strong safety, and cornerback. Landry is as close to the complete package as it gets for a safety prospect coming from the collegiate ranks. He projects as a free safety in the NFL...

  6. Amobi Okoye DT Louisville
    Okoye started 10 of the 11 games he played in during the 2005 season, missed the Florida Atlantic game with a foot sprain, and finished the season with 23 total tackles, four tackles-for-loss, 0.5 sacks, and three fumble recoveries. Okoye isn't fundamentally sound and he needs to keep his weight down to be effective. However, he is a young developmental-prospect that has the bulk to develop into an effective run stuffer and enough quickness to improve his ability to rush the passer.
Here's what the Mock Drafters are saying:

James Alder from December 6th:

Washington Redskins - Gaines Adams, DE Clemson
Phillip Daniels is 33 years old, and has never really been a big pass-rushing threat. Adams might be a little small at 260 pounds, but he could contribute immediately as a pass-rush specialist. He also has the frame to put on another 10-15 pounds without losing much of his agility.

NFL Draft Blitz from December 14th:
6. Washington Redskins - LaMarr Woodley, DE Michigan:  
Analysis: Washington has been gloriously inconsistent this year. They have not been able to bring a good effort week in and week out. One thing than can't question about Woodley is his effort. He has an amazing motor and a knack for getting into the backfield. Woodley has good technique and deceptive power. Look for him to cause havoc in the backfield of NFC opponents next year.
Way too high in my opinion. Not a good pick. He isn't a pure defensive end and is best suited as a blitzing outside linebacker. Also 6 is a huge stretch. Just my two cents.

Huddle Geeks from December 16th:

CB - *Antoine Cason 6-0, 185 -Arizona
The Redskins had one of the worst pass defenses in the league last season and Shawn Springs isn't getting any younger. They need a young CB to groom before Springs time is up. Cason has ideal size and is an excellent athelete and will be a great addtion to a struggling secondary.
Huh?

Footballs Future from December 18th:

Washington - Quentin Moses, DE, Georgia
The Skins must upgrade their pass rush.

Mock Draft City from December 19th:

Washington DT - *Alan Branch 6-6, 330 - Michigan

Condraft from December 16th:

PICK #8 The Redskins Pick:
Gaines Adams (DE, Clemson)
Gaines Adams is arguably the best defensive prospect in the draft, and this seasons ACC defensive player of the year has proven his NFL value throughout his career at Clemson. A pass-rushing demon, Adams has the knack for making the big sack or recovering the big fumble, and it would be surprising if he fell past here come draft day. The Redskins could also look for help at CB, but defensive line is also a need and Adams fits in perfectly.

We're still a good bit away from the draft so this is speculative, but I'll take Gaines Adams or Alan Branch if they fall to us. Best value from the draft is on the defensive line, and we can supplant either Big Joe Salave'a at DT or help Phillip Daniels in passing situations with a good pressure DE.

Readers, what are your early thoughts on the draft?

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Don't count your chickens
After all, you are going to beat the Giants this weekend and possibly blow your shot at a top 10 pick.
Bleeding Green Nation Philadelphia Eagles Blog

by JasonB on Dec 20, 2006 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

For the record
I'm the kind of fan that cares about winning more than draft picks. I'd much rather beat the Giants at the end of the season than have a top 10 pick. I do not know how to watch the Washington Redskins without hoping they win.

That's why I say take the best value available. We have multiple needs meaning we won't have to force any of our picks. If we have to stretch too far for a DT or DE, picking up a CB or Safety will do the trick and we can try and shore up the D-Line depth on day 2.

by Skin Patrol on Dec 20, 2006 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

My thinking is...
at this point, drafting the secondary in the top 10-15 isn't getting the value of the pick, excpet for maybe Hall.  And I'm not sure he will be that "cover corner" type that would suggest a top 10 pick.

I think the front runners right now are Adams, Moses, and Woodley.  I'm not too sure about the DT position, but those are the top 15 range DEs as rated right now.  Okoye sounds like too much of a project to help immediately, which is what the defense needs.  I've seen Branch play and he looks like a pretty sound pick in the middle of the D line, but I don't know if it's him or Woodley that is the true presence on that line.  I don't know much about Dorsey, but they need a pass rusher.

These types of rankings can change a great deal after the combine and such, but that's what I'm seeing right now.

That being said, if it looks like S Landry from LSU is the real deal at FS, then I might have to consider him.

by TexSkins on Dec 20, 2006 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Landry
And move Taylor to SS or just have him backup Taylor?

by Skin Patrol on Dec 20, 2006 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I've always thought of Taylor as a SS
the way he hits and plays the run.  Moving him would free him up to do both more, and give a more cover-minde guy in the defensive backfield to help over the top.

That's just my thinking...

by TexSkins on Dec 22, 2006 12:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Landry
has a reputation as a hard hitting guy as well, so wouldn't it be nice to have two monsters patrolling the backfield?

by Skin Patrol on Dec 22, 2006 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

It would...
especially since Landry is also known as a coverage guy, something Taylor has never really been accused of.

I think it would also free up Gregg Williams to blitz more, since both of his safeties would be able to and since he'd actually have guys in the safety position that can run 1v1 with TEs and such.

But he'd be an option in the 7-10 range I think.  Earlier than that, and those monster D lineman will still be available.  It's a tough call, but I'd like the team to consider all possibilites.

by TexSkins on Dec 22, 2006 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Big change...
I just don't know if Gregg Williams will change Sean Taylor's position.

I agree completely that Williams should do whatever works, regardless of dogma. I think we'll have a good shot at Landry, if that's who they want. I do NOT want the team to trade draft picks to move up and get him, though.

by Skin Patrol on Dec 23, 2006 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Neither do I...
I want the best defensive player at whatever pick the Skins end up with.

I might even think about trading down to get even more help throughout the draft.

by TexSkins on Dec 24, 2006 4:31 AM EST up reply actions  

And to be honest...
a lot of this depends on what happens in the final 2 weeks, FA, and the combine.  Guys sign to fill needs and prospects rise and fall, so anything right now is speculation.

But the Skins can't afford to draft on the offensive side on day 1 and the early part of day 2 of the draft.

by TexSkins on Dec 22, 2006 12:31 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Offseason Position Primers: Defensive Line
Small
Offseason Position Primers: Offensive Line
Small
WR is the key....
Redskins2_small
WR’s the Redskins Should Consider in 2012 Draft
298012_1597734759305_1714091948_855549_1285303626_nedited_small
Would RG3 Pull a ELI/ELWAY
Small
Whats so good about Tannehill?
Small
Who will we be pursuing this FA 2012?
Small
I'm Torn...
Small
Manning to Texans
Orange_moon_at_nationals_park_small
Solve QB; I almost don't care how!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins